Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool

plainspoken-writing

Plainspoken prose pass for drafted or revised text: make it specific, direct, evidence-grounded, and proportionate.

Skill by lucavb

IndexedMIT★ 3
Write a review

Chalk Labs

Need help deploying plainspoken-writing?

Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.

Book a call

Install

Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

npx agentmarket install skill/lucavb-plainspoken-writing

Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

Plainspoken prose pass for drafted or revised text: make it specific, direct, evidence-grounded, and proportionate.

Use cases: writing

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

Permissions

What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md and code. Checked Nov 2, 2026.

Tools
No tools found
Secrets
None asked for
Install scripts
None found

Network hosts it talks to 1

  • codeload.github.com · found in install command

Files it touches

  • ~/.claude/skills/plainspoken-writing

What's inside

Skill name
plainspoken-writing
Description
Plainspoken prose pass for drafted or revised text: make it specific, direct, evidence-grounded, and proportionate.
License
MIT
Instructions
129 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub

Files (3)

  • CITATIONS.md
  • README.md
  • SKILL.md

SKILL.md (first lines)

# Plainspoken writing

Use this pass for prose. The leading word is **plainspoken**: specific facts,
direct syntax, proportionate emphasis, and evidence-based authority.

The warning signs below are diagnostic. Fix the underlying defect; retain a
flagged word when the context gives it precise work.

## Pass

### 1. Ground the content

For each factual or interpretive claim:

- Anchor every claim in known facts or supplied sources.
- Name the person, source, or group behind an opinion. Match the breadth of the
  attribution to the evidence; one critic is not "critics" or "observers."
- Separate a source's statement from your inference. Ground analysis in facts
  rather than declaring what a fact highlights, reflects, symbolizes, ensures,
  or contributes to.
- Describe the subject before assessing its importance. Include significance,
  influence, legacy, notability, and media attention only when concrete evidence
  makes them part of the subject.
- Replace generic claims about broader trends, debates, landscapes, cultural
  meaning, ecological importance, or ongoing efforts with the relevant fact.
- State uncertainty precisely. When information is missing, name the exact gap
  and omit speculation about privacy, scarcity, documentation, or likelihood.

**Done when:** every claim has a known basis, every opinion has an exact owner,
and no sentence turns missing evidence into a story.

### 2. Make the prose direct

- Prefer `is`, `are`, and `has` when they carry the same meaning as `serves as`,
  `stands as`, `marks`, `represents`, `boasts`, `features`, or `offers`.
- Prefer the ordinary precise verb: `wrote`, `used`, `moved`, `tried`, or `died`
  when a grander synonym adds no meaning.
- Reuse the right term. Stable terminology beats synonym rotation.
- Let the facts set the tone. Replace promotional, travel-guide, press-release,
  and ceremonial language with concrete description.
- Use contrast for a real contrast. Flatten reflexive patterns such as "not only
  X but also Y," "not X but Y," and "X rather than Y" when they merely dramatize
  the point.
- Use the number of examples or modifiers the content requires. Break a forced
  rule of three.
- Keep sentence openings and endings functional. Replace trailing `-ing` clauses
  that append unsupported importance or impact.
- Match the requested register and variety of English. Preserve the author's
  established voice where one exists; keep human texture natural rather than
  manufactured.

Scan for clusters of stock diction, then rewrite the thought rather than
thesaurus-swapping the token:

`Additionally`, `align with`, `bolstered`, `crucial`, `deep dive`, `delve`,
`emphasizing`, `enduring`, `enhance`, `fostering`, `garner`, `highlight`,
`interplay`, `intricate`, `key`, `landscape`, `meticulous`, `pivotal`, `robust`,
`showcase`, `tapestry`, `testament`, `underscore`, `valuable`, `vibrant`,
`groundbreaking`, `renowned`, `rich`, `profound`, `nestled`, `in the heart of`,
`commitment to`, and `diverse array`.

**Done when:** the shortest accurate construction wins, repeated terms remain
stable, and emphasis comes from facts rather than stock cadence or diction.

### 3. Give the content its natural shape

- Organize around the reader's questions instead of a generic article outline.
- Add a heading only when it helps navigation. Use sentence case, preserve
  heading levels, and give each section content of its own.
- Let the surrounding format supply the document title rather than repeating it
  as a first heading.
- Use paragraphs by default. Use lists for actual sets or sequences and tables
  for comparisons that become clearer in rows and columns.
- Use the target venue's markup and keep Markdown, raw formatting tokens, and
  unsupported syntax out of other output formats.
- Use bold sparingly for functional emphasis. Use emoji only when the requested
  medium calls for them.
- Use punctuation for syntax, not punch. Replace formulaic em dashes with a
  comma, colon, parentheses, or a new sentence as appropriate.
- Follow the venue's quote and apostrophe convention consistently. Curly quotes
  are not a defect by themselves.
- Keep decorative section dividers, empty parent headings, repetitive
  `**Label:** explanation` lists, and canned sections such as "Challenges and
  future prospects" or "Awards and recognition" only when the material genuinely
  requires them.
- End on the last substantive point. A generic summary, optimistic outlook,
  balanced "despite these challenges" paragraph, or claim about future relevance
  needs concrete content to earn a place.

**Done when:** every structural and formatting choice carries information or
improves navigation.

### 4. Remove chatbot residue

- Deliver the requested prose directly: greetings, praise, "of course," "here
  is," "I hope this helps," offers to do more, and operator instructions belong
  outside the reader-facing text.
- Let the text demonstrate neutrality, completeness, sourcing, compliance,
  clarity, or improvement rather than asserting those qualities.
- Replace knowledge-cutoff disclaimers and references to available search
  results with a precise limitation that matters to the reader, if one does.
- Resolve every template token, placeholder, dummy date, example URL, bracketed
  instruction, and drafting note before delivery.
- Keep headings and summaries proportional to the message. A short answer earns
  a miniature report structure only when the content needs it.

**Done when:** the output contains only reader-facing content and no trace of the
conversation, prompt, drafting scaffold, or self-certification.

### 5. Audit sources

When the prose uses citations, load
[`CITATIONS.md`](CITATIONS.md) and complete its source audit.

**Done when:** the citation audit's completion criterion in `CITATIONS.md` is
true.

### 6. Cross-check

From lucavb/skills, MIT.

More from lucavb/skills

Signals

Stars
3
Forks
0
Open issues
0
Last commit (this folder)
Aug 19, 2026 (2 months ago)

From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

Details

License
MIT
First seen
Oct 24, 2026
Last checked
Oct 24, 2026

More from lucavb

Done for you

Rather not set it up yourself?

Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.

See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies

Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.

launches shipped
50+
launches shipped
media placements
500+
media placements
founders on every account
2
founders on every account

Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block

Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.

Get plainspoken-writing running in your business

Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.

Goes to the Chalk Labs founders, not the newsletter. Privacy

Need help deploying plainspoken-writing?

CallGet help
Cite this page

plainspoken-writing skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/lucavb-plainspoken-writing (last updated 2026-10-24)