domain-modeling
建立並磨利一個專案的領域語言 — 挑戰模糊術語、拆開超載的詞、把難以回頭的決策寫成 ADR。當討論程式庫術語、直接撰寫或編輯 GLOSSARY.md 或 ADR、命名含糊、或同一個詞在不同地方意思不同時使用。
Skill by Luca0x5755
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/luca0x5755-domain-modeling
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/domain-modeling
What's inside
- Skill name
domain-modeling- Description
- 建立並磨利一個專案的領域語言 — 挑戰模糊術語、拆開超載的詞、把難以回頭的決策寫成 ADR。當討論程式庫術語、直接撰寫或編輯 GLOSSARY.md 或 ADR、命名含糊、或同一個詞在不同地方意思不同時使用。
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 48 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (1)
- SKILL.md
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Domain Modeling The active discipline of keeping the project's words precise. Merely *reading* `GLOSSARY.md` for vocabulary is not this skill — that is a one-line lookup. This skill is for when the words themselves need work. ## The three artifacts **`GLOSSARY.md`** — the glossary, **and nothing else**. No implementation details, decisions, or todos — anything else here gets read as current reality by every downstream agent. One entry per domain term: ```markdown **Session**: A single authenticated period for one user, bounded by login and expiry. Holds no request state. _Avoid_: connection, login (a login is the event that starts a Session) ``` The `_Avoid_` line is the load-bearing part. A glossary that only says what a word means does not stop the wrong word being used. **`docs/adr/NNNN-<slug>.md`** — one decision per file. **A decision earns an ADR only when all three are true:** 1. **Hard to reverse** — undoing it means touching code not yet written. 2. **Surprising without context** — a future reader would ask "why on earth is it done this way?" 3. **A real trade-off** — an alternative was genuinely considered and rejected. Any of the three missing → no ADR file. An ADR per preference is noise that buries the three that matter. Title states the decision, not the topic: `0007-sessions-expire-after-30-days`, never `0007-session-handling`. Body covers what was decided, what was rejected, and why. One status line at the top: `Status: Proposed` until the change implementing it flips it to `Accepted` — unbuilt work must not read as settled. No template ceremony beyond that. **`docs/decision-log.md`** — one line per decision that fails the gate but deserves a trace: date, decision, one clause of why. Single file, append-only, no template. Deliberately not in `GLOSSARY.md`: the glossary is in-force truth; the log is history. ## Sharpening a term **Test for overload.** Grep the term across the codebase and docs. If it names three different things, it is doing three jobs — split it. "Account" that means the billing entity, the login identity, and the org is three terms wearing one word. **Test for emptiness.** Ask what the term *excludes*. A term that excludes nothing is decoration. "Manager", "handler", "service", "data" usually fail this. **Stress with scenarios.** Push edge cases at the definition until it breaks: what happens on a refund? A partial one? Two at once? The definition that survives is the one to write down. **Prefer the word the users already say.** Inventing vocabulary buys precision at the cost of every future conversation. ## Rules - Update `GLOSSARY.md` **inline, during the work** — not in a cleanup pass afterwards. A glossary written at the end is a glossary written from memory. - One ADR per decision. Never batch. - Create files lazily. A session that settles nothing durable writes nothing. - Renaming a term means renaming it in the code too, in the same change. A glossary the code disagrees with is worse than no glossary. - Record flagged ambiguities you could not resolve at the bottom of `GLOSSARY.md`, with what would settle them. An open question written down beats a false definition.
From Luca0x5755/luca-skills, MIT.
More from Luca0x5755/luca-skills
- 0.601score
consolidate-docs
Luca0x5755
對專案內凌散的規格文件動一次 brownfield 手術:全量盤點→提案報告(目標樹、映射表、衝突表)→核准後按 capability 分批遷移成 docs/specs/ 真相層,原檔進 archive 不刪。日常維護走管線,不重跑這把刀。
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.601score
code-review
Luca0x5755
沿三條軸審查自某個定點以來的 diff — Standards(有沒有遵守這個 repo 的規範?)、Spec(有沒有做到票要求的事?)與 Reuse(倉庫裡有沒有現成的?)。當使用者要審查一個分支、一個 PR 或進行中的工作時使用,也對應 "code review"、"review this…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.601score
frontend-spec
Luca0x5755
為有 UI 的規格定前端真相:路由表、四態頁面與 style tokens 寫進前端合訂本(docs/05_frontend_spec.md,章節標能力)、.pen mockup 常駐 docs/mockup/ — 都在 feature branch 上改,與程式碼同 PR 合併。/to-spec…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.598score
diagnosing-bugs
Luca0x5755
對付硬 bug、間歇性失敗與效能回歸的紀律迴圈 — 重現、最小化、立假說、下探針、修好、補回歸測試。當東西壞了而原因不明顯時使用,也對應 "flaky"、"regression"、「時好時壞」、「找不到原因」等說法。
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.598score
grilling
Luca0x5755
就一個計畫、決策或想法窮追不捨地拷問使用者。當使用者想壓力測試自己的思路、想被質疑一個設計,或說出 "grill"、「拷問我」、「戳破我」這類觸發語時使用。
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.598score
browser-evidence
Luca0x5755
把既定案例清單跑成可交付的證據 — 截圖或原始回應、網路紀錄與被測版本 manifest。瀏覽器是預設通道,無 UI 案例走 api/cli,卡人一步由操作者接手;落在 docs/uat/,走 evidence 分支 PR 合回基底分支。
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.598score
setup-skills
Luca0x5755
為這個 repo 設定工程技能所需的組態 — 議題追蹤器、領域文件位置、git 護欄 hook,以及本機議題用的 CI 檢查。初始化跑一次;重跑可換追蹤器或補裝、更新護欄。
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.598score
implement-spec
Luca0x5755
依規格與票的阻塞圖,在隔離工作樹平行建置整份規格並整合至單一分支;支援已設定的追蹤器,可由操作者介入,PR 視需要建立。
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.598score
prototype
Luca0x5755
做一個用完即丟的原型來回答一個設計問題 — 狀態與邏輯用可執行的程式,UI 則做幾個可切換的變體。當一個設計問題在紙上定不下來時使用,也對應 "prototype"、"spike"、「先做個雛形看看」等說法。
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.598score
tdd
Luca0x5755
測試驅動開發,紅—綠—重構。當要以測試先行的方式建置功能或修 bug、當使用者提到 "TDD"、"red-green"、「紅綠」,或要求寫出能撐過重構的測試時使用。
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.595score
git-release
Luca0x5755
先在終端機預覽繁體中文發布摘要,使用者確認後才更新版本、commit、打 tag、推送並發佈 release 頁面。
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.595score
improve-codebase-architecture
Luca0x5755
勘查程式庫的深化機會,排序後呈上,再對你挑中的那一個進行拷問。
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 3
- Forks
- 1
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Oct 7, 2026 (21 days ago)
- Last release
- Oct 8, 2026 (21 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/Luca0x5755/luca-skills
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from Luca0x5755
- 0.601score
code-review
Luca0x5755
沿三條軸審查自某個定點以來的 diff — Standards(有沒有遵守這個 repo 的規範?)、Spec(有沒有做到票要求的事?)與 Reuse(倉庫裡有沒有現成的?)。當使用者要審查一個分支、一個 PR 或進行中的工作時使用,也對應 "code review"、"review this…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.601score
frontend-spec
Luca0x5755
為有 UI 的規格定前端真相:路由表、四態頁面與 style tokens 寫進前端合訂本(docs/05_frontend_spec.md,章節標能力)、.pen mockup 常駐 docs/mockup/ — 都在 feature branch 上改,與程式碼同 PR 合併。/to-spec…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.601score
consolidate-docs
Luca0x5755
對專案內凌散的規格文件動一次 brownfield 手術:全量盤點→提案報告(目標樹、映射表、衝突表)→核准後按 capability 分批遷移成 docs/specs/ 真相層,原檔進 archive 不刪。日常維護走管線,不重跑這把刀。
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.598score
browser-evidence
Luca0x5755
把既定案例清單跑成可交付的證據 — 截圖或原始回應、網路紀錄與被測版本 manifest。瀏覽器是預設通道,無 UI 案例走 api/cli,卡人一步由操作者接手;落在 docs/uat/,走 evidence 分支 PR 合回基底分支。
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.598score
setup-skills
Luca0x5755
為這個 repo 設定工程技能所需的組態 — 議題追蹤器、領域文件位置、git 護欄 hook,以及本機議題用的 CI 檢查。初始化跑一次;重跑可換追蹤器或補裝、更新護欄。
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.598score
diagnosing-bugs
Luca0x5755
對付硬 bug、間歇性失敗與效能回歸的紀律迴圈 — 重現、最小化、立假說、下探針、修好、補回歸測試。當東西壞了而原因不明顯時使用,也對應 "flaky"、"regression"、「時好時壞」、「找不到原因」等說法。
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9
Cite this page
domain-modeling skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/luca0x5755-domain-modeling (last updated 2026-10-24)