Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool

address-pr-comments

End-to-end closeout of unresolved review feedback across one or more GitHub PRs.

Skill by lexfrei

IndexedBSD-3-Clause★ 11
Write a review

Install

Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

npx agentmarket install skill/lexfrei-address-pr-comments

Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

End-to-end closeout of unresolved review feedback across one or more GitHub PRs. For each PR checks out the branch, fetches every source of blocking feedback (inline threads, CHANGES_REQUESTED review-submission bodies, issue comments, plus reviewDecision), verifies against current code, fixes legitimate findings (one signed-off commit + push per finding), asks approval on reply drafts, posts replies (inline reply for threads, top-level @mention for review bodies), then moves to the next PR. Returns to the original branch at the end.

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

Permissions

What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md and code. Checked Oct 25, 2026.

Tools
No tools found
Secrets
None asked for
Install scripts
None found

Network hosts it talks to 1

  • codeload.github.com · found in install command

Files it touches

  • ~/.claude/skills/address-pr-comments

What's inside

Skill name
address-pr-comments
Description
End-to-end closeout of unresolved review feedback across one or more GitHub PRs. For each PR checks out the branch, fetches every source of blocking feedback (inline threads, CHANGES_REQUESTED review-submission bodies, issue comments, plus reviewDecision), verifies against current code, fixes legitimate findings (one signed-off commit + push per finding), asks approval on reply drafts, posts replies (inline reply for threads, top-level @mention for review bodies), then moves to the next PR. Returns to the original branch at the end.
License
BSD-3-Clause
Instructions
292 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub

Files (1)

  • SKILL.md

SKILL.md (first lines)

**CRITICAL**: This skill makes PUBLIC changes — commits pushed to the PR branch and replies visible to the PR author, reviewers, and all watchers. Every commit must follow project conventions (signed off, GPG-signed where configured, conventional message). Every reply must be accurate, justified, and in English.

## Arguments

Parse `$ARGUMENTS` as a space-separated list of PR refs.

- Each ref: bare number (e.g. `2395`, uses the repo from `gh repo view --json owner,name`) OR `owner/repo#N` (e.g. `cozystack/cozystack#2395`).
- If no args: fall back to detection from the current branch via `gh pr view --json number,headRepositoryOwner,headRepository --jq '.headRepositoryOwner.login + "/" + .headRepository.name + "#" + (.number|tostring)'` — single-PR mode.
- If no args and no PR can be inferred: report the error and stop.

Normalize each ref into `OWNER`, `REPO`, `PR_NUMBER`.

## Step 0: Record the starting state

Before touching any PR branch:

```bash
ORIGINAL_REF=$(git symbolic-ref --quiet --short HEAD || git rev-parse HEAD)
if [ -z "$(git status --porcelain)" ]; then CLEAN_START=1; else CLEAN_START=0; fi
```

- `ORIGINAL_REF` is the branch to return to at the end.
- `CLEAN_START == 1` means the working tree was clean — safe to restore later.
- If the working tree is dirty, ask the user how to handle it (abort, stash, or proceed without final restore) BEFORE doing any `git checkout`.

## Step 1: Outer loop over PR refs

For each PR ref in the parsed list, execute Steps 2–10 in order. Between PRs, print a visible separator (e.g. `────── PR #N ──────`) so progress is easy to follow.

On a per-PR unrecoverable error (PR not found, branch push rejected and user chose not to force, etc.): print the error, skip the remaining steps for that PR, continue with the next ref. Do not abort the whole run.

## Step 2: Check out the PR branch

```bash
PR_BRANCH=$(gh pr view $PR_NUMBER --repo $OWNER/$REPO --json headRefName --jq .headRefName)
git fetch origin "$PR_BRANCH"
git checkout "$PR_BRANCH"
git log --oneline -5
```

**Worktree guard**: if `git checkout` fails with `fatal: '<branch>' is already used by worktree at <path>`, parse the path, `cd` into that worktree, and run the rest of the PR's steps there. Do not delete or force anything.

## Step 3: Read project agent docs

Scan the repo for agent-facing contribution rules and follow them exactly. Common locations:

- `AGENTS.md`, `docs/agents/contributing.md`, `docs/agents/*.md`
- `CONTRIBUTING.md` (look for "review comments" / "AI bot" / "commit format" sections)

Project rules OVERRIDE this skill's defaults — e.g. commit message format, reply etiquette, threads to ignore, whether a separate commit per thread is required.

## Step 4: Fetch every source of actionable feedback

Three GitHub objects can carry blocking feedback on a PR. The skill must read all three:

1. **Inline review threads** (`reviewThreads`) — comments attached to a file/line, repliable via `addPullRequestReviewThreadReply`.
2. **Review submission bodies** (`reviews[].body`) — the freeform text a reviewer types when they click *Approve / Request changes / Comment*. They have **no** `threadId` and are **not** part of `reviewThreads`. A `CHANGES_REQUESTED` review with only a body and zero inline comments is the most-common cause of a PR being blocked without any thread to reply to. Missing this source = silently ignoring the reviewer.
3. **Issue comments** — the general PR conversation (bot summaries, follow-ups).

Also pull `reviewDecision` so the skill knows when the PR is blocked but no findings remain after filtering — that almost always means a finding was missed.

```bash
SELF_LOGIN=$(gh api user --jq .login)

gh api graphql -F owner="$OWNER" -F repo="$REPO" -F pr=$PR_NUMBER -f query='
query($owner: String!, $repo: String!, $pr: Int!) {
  repository(owner: $owner, name: $repo) {
    pullRequest(number: $pr) {
      reviewDecision
      reviewThreads(first: 100) {
        pageInfo { hasNextPage endCursor }
        nodes {
          id
          isResolved
          isOutdated
          comments(first: 100) {
            pageInfo { hasNextPage }
            nodes {
              id
              path
              line
              originalLine
              author { login }
              bodyText
              url
              createdAt
            }
          }
          latestComment: comments(last: 1) {
            nodes {
              author { login }
              createdAt
            }
          }
        }
      }
      reviews(first: 100, states: [CHANGES_REQUESTED, COMMENTED]) {
        pageInfo { hasNextPage endCursor }
        nodes {
          id
          state
          body
          author { login }
          submittedAt
          url
          commit { oid }
          comments(first: 1) { totalCount }
        }
      }
    }
  }
}'
```

Filter:

- **Threads** — keep where `isResolved == false`.
- **Threads (self-reply guard)** — additionally drop any thread where `latestComment.nodes[0].author.login == $SELF_LOGIN`. This prevents duplicate replies on re-runs against PRs with reviewers that do not auto-resolve threads after a fix lands (e.g. Gemini Code Assist). Empty `latestComment.nodes` is treated as "not me" and the thread is kept. To genuinely re-engage a previously-replied thread, the operator posts the reply manually outside the skill flow.
- **Review submissions** — keep where `state == "CHANGES_REQUESTED"` (always, even with empty body — surface as ASK so the user explains the block). For `state == "COMMENTED"`, keep only if `body != ""` AND `comments.totalCount == 0` (a COMMENTED review with inline comments is already covered by the threads query; its body is usually a meta-summary).

From lexfrei/ccc, BSD-3-Clause.

More from lexfrei/ccc

Signals

Stars
11
Forks
3
Open issues
2
Last commit (this folder)
May 10, 2026 (5 months ago)
Last release
Oct 4, 2026 (24 days ago)

From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

Details

License
BSD-3-Clause
First seen
Oct 24, 2026
Last checked
Oct 24, 2026

More from lexfrei

Cite this page

address-pr-comments skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/lexfrei-address-pr-comments (last updated 2026-10-24)