Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool

scotus-argument-analyzer

Analyze a U.S.

Skill by Seth J. Chandler

IndexedNOASSERTION★ 895
Write a review

Install

Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

npx agentmarket install skill/lawve-ai-scotus-argument-analyzer

Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

Analyze a U.S. Supreme Court oral argument transcript for a lawyer who has not read it: each advocate's position, authorities discussed, the bench's concerns, tentative judicial leanings, possible dispositions, and advocacy strengths and weaknesses, with transcript pinpoints. Use for oral argument analysis, a SCOTUS argument report, or an assessment of how the justices approached a case. Requires readable transcript content; research, Python tallying, and document creation are optional, with disclosed fallbacks.

Use cases: documents, writing, research, legal, document-processing, deep-research

Reviews

Write a review

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

Permissions

What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.

Tools
No tools found
Secrets
None asked for
Install scripts
None found
Runs as
Python package

Network hosts it talks to 1

  • codeload.github.com · found in install command

Files it touches

  • ~/.claude/skills/scotus-argument-analyzer

What's inside

Skill name
scotus-argument-analyzer
Description
Analyze a U.S. Supreme Court oral argument transcript for a lawyer who has not read it: each advocate's position, authorities discussed, the bench's concerns, tentative judicial leanings, possible dispositions, and advocacy strengths and weaknesses, with transcript pinpoints. Use for oral argument analysis, a SCOTUS argument report, or an assessment of how the justices approached a case. Requires readable transcript content; research, Python tallying, and document creation are optional, with disclosed fallbacks.
License
NOASSERTION
Metadata
author: Seth J. Chandler · license: Apache-2.0 · version: 2026-10-06 · category: Legal Research & Analysis · language: English · requires: Readable transcript; optional research, Python 3, and document generation · author_link: https://legaled.ai · jurisdiction: United States
Instructions
124 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub

Before installing

  • Ships executable scripts

Agent Skills spec issues

  • name: "scotus-argument-analyzer" does not match folder "scotus-argument-analyzer-seth-chandler"

Files (5)

  • LICENSE
  • NOTICE
  • README.md
  • SKILL.md
  • tally.py · scripts/

The license isn't open source, so the instructions aren't shown here. Read SKILL.md on GitHub

More from lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills

Signals

Stars
895
Forks
119
Open issues
7
Last commit (this folder)
Oct 19, 2026 (8 days ago)

From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

Details

Version
2026-10-06
License
NOASSERTION
Repository
github.com/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills
Website
lawve.ai
First seen
Oct 24, 2026
Last checked
Oct 24, 2026
Source
GitHubgithub-graphql

More from Seth J. Chandler

Cite this page

scotus-argument-analyzer skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/lawve-ai-scotus-argument-analyzer (last updated 2026-10-24)