automate-me
Turn the user's working preferences into a personal style skill or update one from explicit feedback and scoped conversation evidence.
Skill by kyeshmz
Chalk Labs
Need help deploying automate-me?
Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/kyeshmz-automate-me
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/automate-me
What's inside
- Skill name
automate-me- Description
- Turn the user's working preferences into a personal style skill or update one from explicit feedback and scoped conversation evidence. Use for @automate-me, automate me, capture my working style, or create, update, or refresh my personal mode skill.
- License
- MIT
- Metadata
- opencode/autoinvoke: false
- Instructions
- 43 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (3)
- LICENSE
- SKILL.md
- shared-rules.md · references/
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Automate me Capture a user's distinct working conventions in one concise skill. Use ordinary skill authoring for a task-specific procedure or one narrow habit instead. Do not turn a preference interview into a new general-purpose mode bundle. Read `references/shared-rules.md`. Resolve resources from the loaded skill base. Load `skill-creator` when available and `unslop` for prose discipline. Use `jiro` only as an example of granularity. Do not copy its preferences into the user's skill. ## Find the target 1. Establish the intended repository, skill ID, scope, and allowed writes. Inspect only relevant project skill locations and any existing skill path the user supplied. Do not search global skill trees or unrelated sessions to infer identity. 2. If an existing personal style skill matches, update it when requested. Otherwise ask whether to update it or start fresh. Preserve its ID, category, and sections not contradicted by new evidence. Ask why a fresh start is needed before discarding an established skill. 3. For an update, use its latest known edit date as the history boundary when available. A Git timestamp can establish that date. If no reliable boundary exists, say so rather than inventing one. ## Gather evidence Use the active conversation, user-supplied transcripts, or explicitly authorized known session IDs in the target workspace. Do not scan global session storage or other workspaces. Ask for a bounded history source when none is available, or proceed from direct preferences alone. With enough supplied history, split it into two or three non-overlapping slices. Read them locally or use bounded read-only `delegate` tasks. Give every worker exact permitted paths or session IDs and forbid edits, external writes, further delegation, and unrelated history access. Inherit the current model unless the user authorizes an override and the host confirms it. No role configuration is required. Look for response length and tone, delegation habits, verification standards, code and prose discipline, worktree and review conventions, and skill-maintenance habits. Return patterns with resolvable evidence pointers. Prefer repeated signals across at least two slices. Drop contradictory or isolated inferred preferences unless the user confirms them. An explicit current preference can stand without repeated historical examples. ## Ask directly Mining cannot establish intent that never appeared. Ask one or two compact questions with four to six options. Allow several choices for category questions when the host supports it. Use ordinary chat if no structured question tool exists. Start with the areas that matter, follow up on selected areas, and end with one free-form invitation for anything missed. For an update, ask what changed or remains missing. Do not repeat a full intake or present twenty questions at once. ## Cluster and draft Group only evidenced, non-default rules. Possible sections include response style, autonomy, understanding first, delegation, code and prose discipline, review and verification, process, and skill maintenance. Omit sections with nothing distinct to say. Write short operational imperatives. Use the user or the human rather than a person's name in the body. Reference companion skills by exact available ID instead of copying their contents. Do not invent personas, metaphors, permissions, or unsupported host capabilities. A preference cannot override host rules or authorize commits, deployments, deletion, customer messages, or unrelated external writes. For a new project skill, write `<target-repository>/.opencode/skills/<chosen-id>/SKILL.md` unless the repository is itself an OpenCode configuration checkout with its own layout. Write a global skill only when explicitly requested. Preserve an existing target's established category. Never place generated user skills in this installed pack. Make `name` match the chosen ID. Describe explicit `@<id>` invocation and the user's requested style, not generic coding keywords. Use one valid YAML description scalar and `metadata.opencode/autoinvoke: false` unless the user explicitly wants automatic application. A `-mode` suffix is optional rather than a host feature. ## Refine and hand back Apply `unslop` while preserving meaning and justified uncertainty. Show the draft and ask whether it matches the user's style or misses anything. Revise from that feedback. This is subjective output. Do not impose a benchmark loop unless trigger accuracy or a concrete behavioral failure needs testing. Validate frontmatter, exact IDs, reference resolution, and target placement. Report the target path, captured preferences, evidence limits, and remaining choices. Leave commits, pushes, PR creation, and global installation to explicit authorization. A worktree or PR is not a mandatory final step.
From kyeshmz/jiro, MIT.
More from kyeshmz/jiro
- 0.570score
create-formal-verification-skill
kyeshmz
Generate and prove a project-local formal verification skill for a high-risk invariant, race, parser, retry, or unsafe operation.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.570score
jiro
kyeshmz
Jiro's verified engineering workflow for OpenCode.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
how
kyeshmz
Use for how does X work, code walkthroughs before changing something, and placement, ownership, or layering questions such as where should this live or which…
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
interrogate
kyeshmz
Challenge code or a design with independent adversarial reviewers and synthesize a pragmatic verdict without applying fixes.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
architect
kyeshmz
Sketch caller usage, types, signatures, ownership, and module boundaries before implementation.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
arena
kyeshmz
Generate independent candidates for one task, score them against a private rubric, select a base, and synthesize the strongest coherent result.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
benchmark-checklist
kyeshmz
Vet a performance claim against its limiter, production tuning, physical limits, errors, repeatability, relevance, and proof that timed work happened.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
blast-radius
kyeshmz
Trace what a change can break beyond its diff and prove the load-bearing safety fact against real code.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
create-subagent
kyeshmz
Create or update a reusable OpenCode subagent with a clear role, required skills, permissions, and reporting contract.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
delegate
kyeshmz
Scope work into bounded child-agent tasks, write self-contained briefs, and verify their results.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
figure-it-out
kyeshmz
Design and execute an auditable workflow when no narrower recipe fits a large migration, multi-part change, or unattended task.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
ketchup
kyeshmz
Catch the user up on changes in this chat since their previous message and list every decision waiting on them with enough context to decide.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Oct 19, 2026 (12 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/kyeshmz/jiro
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from kyeshmz
- 0.570score
jiro
kyeshmz
Jiro's verified engineering workflow for OpenCode.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.570score
create-formal-verification-skill
kyeshmz
Generate and prove a project-local formal verification skill for a high-risk invariant, race, parser, retry, or unsafe operation.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
how
kyeshmz
Use for how does X work, code walkthroughs before changing something, and placement, ownership, or layering questions such as where should this live or which…
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
architect
kyeshmz
Sketch caller usage, types, signatures, ownership, and module boundaries before implementation.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
arena
kyeshmz
Generate independent candidates for one task, score them against a private rubric, select a base, and synthesize the strongest coherent result.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
interrogate
kyeshmz
Challenge code or a design with independent adversarial reviewers and synthesize a pragmatic verdict without applying fixes.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9
Done for you
Rather not set it up yourself?
Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.
See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies
Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.
- launches shipped
- 50+
- launches shipped
- media placements
- 500+
- media placements
- founders on every account
- 2
- founders on every account
Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block
Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.
Get automate-me running in your business
Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.
Cite this page
automate-me skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/kyeshmz-automate-me (last updated 2026-10-24)