code-review
Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices.
Skill by kevinashworth
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/kevinashworth-code-review
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: design, testing, security
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions: not checked yet.
What's inside
- Skill name
code-review- Description
- Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or providing feedback on code quality. Covers security, performance, testing, and design review.
- License
- GPL-3.0
- Instructions
- 99 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Agent Skills spec issues
- metadata: must be a key/value mapping
Files (1)
- SKILL.md
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Sentry Code Review
Follow these guidelines when reviewing code for Sentry projects.
## Review Checklist
### Identifying Problems
Look for these issues in code changes:
- **Runtime errors**: Potential exceptions, null pointer issues, out-of-bounds access
- **Performance**: Unbounded O(n²) operations, N+1 queries, unnecessary allocations
- **Side effects**: Unintended behavioral changes affecting other components
- **Backwards compatibility**: Breaking API changes without migration path
- **ORM queries**: Complex Django ORM with unexpected query performance
- **Security vulnerabilities**: Injection, XSS, access control gaps, secrets exposure
### Design Assessment
- Do component interactions make logical sense?
- Does the change align with existing project architecture?
- Are there conflicts with current requirements or goals?
### Test Coverage
Every PR should have appropriate test coverage:
- Functional tests for business logic
- Integration tests for component interactions
- End-to-end tests for critical user paths
Verify tests cover actual requirements and edge cases. Avoid excessive branching or looping in test code.
### Long-Term Impact
Flag for senior engineer review when changes involve:
- Database schema modifications
- API contract changes
- New framework or library adoption
- Performance-critical code paths
- Security-sensitive functionality
## Feedback Guidelines
### Tone
- Be polite and empathetic
- Provide actionable suggestions, not vague criticism
- Phrase as questions when uncertain: "Have you considered...?"
### Approval
- Approve when only minor issues remain
- Don't block PRs for stylistic preferences
- Remember: the goal is risk reduction, not perfect code
## Common Patterns to Flag
### Python/Django
```python
# Bad: N+1 query
for user in users:
print(user.profile.name) # Separate query per user
# Good: Prefetch related
users = User.objects.prefetch_related('profile')
```
### TypeScript/React
```typescript
// Bad: Missing dependency in useEffect
useEffect(() => {
fetchData(userId);
}, []); // userId not in deps
// Good: Include all dependencies
useEffect(() => {
fetchData(userId);
}, [userId]);
```
### Security
```python
# Bad: SQL injection risk
cursor.execute(f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = {user_id}")
# Good: Parameterized query
cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = %s", [user_id])
```
## References
- [Sentry Code Review Guidelines](https://develop.sentry.dev/engineering-practices/code-review/)From kevinashworth/opencode-config, GPL-3.0.
More from kevinashworth/opencode-config
- 0.475score
atomic-commits
kevinashworth
Enforces atomic commit workflow — breaks implementation into small, self-contained units and commits after each one.
SkillCFreshness: CClaude Code +9 - 0.454score
audit
kevinashworth
Audit the code so far.
SkillCFreshness: CClaude Code +9 - 0.441score
grill-me
kevinashworth
Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree.
SkillCFreshness: CClaude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Jun 26, 2026 (4 months ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- GPL-3.0
- Repository
- github.com/kevinashworth/opencode-config
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
Same skill elsewhere
Copies of this SKILL.md published by others; search shows only one of them.
- 0.643score
code-review
getsentryOfficial
Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 1.1KClaude Code +9 - 0.307score
code-review
stolinski
Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 85Claude Code +9 - 0.282score
code-review
liu-ran-1
Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices.
SkillCFreshness: CClaude Code +9
More from kevinashworth
- 0.475score
atomic-commits
kevinashworth
Enforces atomic commit workflow — breaks implementation into small, self-contained units and commits after each one.
SkillCFreshness: CClaude Code +9 - 0.454score
audit
kevinashworth
Audit the code so far.
SkillCFreshness: CClaude Code +9 - 0.441score
grill-me
kevinashworth
Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree.
SkillCFreshness: CClaude Code +9
Cite this page
code-review skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/kevinashworth-code-review (last updated 2026-10-24)