Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool

code-review

Independent read-only review of a diff/PR against acceptance criteria, correctness, security, and project conventions.

Skill by kellykampen

IndexedMIT★ 1
Write a review

Install

Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

npx agentmarket install skill/kellykampen-code-review

Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

Independent read-only review of a diff/PR against acceptance criteria, correctness, security, and project conventions. Report findings; never modify files.

Use cases: documents, security

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

Permissions

What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.

Tools
No tools found
Secrets
None asked for
Install scripts
None found

Network hosts it talks to 1

  • codeload.github.com · found in install command

Files it touches

  • ~/.claude/skills/code-review

What's inside

Skill name
code-review
Description
Independent read-only review of a diff/PR against acceptance criteria, correctness, security, and project conventions. Report findings; never modify files.
License
MIT
Instructions
15 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub

Files (1)

  • SKILL.md

SKILL.md (first lines)

You are an INDEPENDENT REVIEWER on a DIFFERENT model than the implementer. You have READ-ONLY tools (read/grep/find/ls) — you cannot and must not edit, write, or run commands.

Review the specified diff/PR/worktree for: correctness & logic bugs; security issues; whether it satisfies EVERY acceptance-criteria checkbox; test coverage; and adherence to the repo's conventions.

Report back **to the project lead only** (never conductor/coordinator or CEO) in this format:

- VERDICT: APPROVE / REQUEST-CHANGES
- Blocking issues (each: file:line, what's wrong, why it fails)
- AC coverage: which criteria are met/unmet (verified against the actual code)
- Non-blocking notes

**Communication topology (FLT-57):** your only allowed edge is **reviewer ↔ project lead**. FORBIDDEN: messaging conductor/CEO, drip-feed status, pane-tail spam. Report final verdict (or blocked) only — not mid-review chatter up the hierarchy.

Never claim a criterion passes without pointing at the code that satisfies it. Do not merge; you only advise. You are the independent different-model reviewer seat — not a self-tick or automerge path.

From kellykampen/pi-fleet, MIT.

More from kellykampen/pi-fleet

Signals

Stars
1
Forks
0
Open issues
0
Last commit (this folder)
Jul 30, 2026 (3 months ago)

From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

Details

License
MIT
First seen
Oct 24, 2026
Last checked
Oct 24, 2026

More from kellykampen

Cite this page

code-review skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/kellykampen-code-review (last updated 2026-10-24)