Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/kashman001-codebase-design
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: design
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/codebase-design
What's inside
- Skill name
codebase-design- Description
- Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable or AI-navigable, or when another skill needs the deep-module vocabulary.
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 118 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (4)
- DEEPENING.md
- DESIGN-IT-TWICE.md
- SKILL.md
- openai.yaml · agents/
SKILL.md (first lines)
<!--
Vendored from github.com/mattpocock/skills — skills/engineering/codebase-design/
at commit 49dd158 (2026-10-09). Upstream content (MIT — see
skills/vendored-skills.md); keep this directory unmodified so refreshes
stay a clean re-copy: scripts/sync-vendored-skills.sh.
-->
# Codebase Design
Design **deep modules**: a lot of behaviour behind a small interface, placed at a clean seam, testable through that interface. Use this language and these principles wherever code is being designed or restructured. The aim is leverage for callers, locality for maintainers, and testability for everyone.
## Glossary
Use these terms exactly: don't substitute "component," "service," "API," or "boundary." Consistent language is the whole point.
**Module**: anything with an interface and an implementation. Deliberately scale-agnostic: a function, class, package, or tier-spanning slice. _Avoid_: unit, component, service.
**Interface**: everything a caller must know to use the module correctly: the type signature, but also invariants, ordering constraints, error modes, required configuration, and performance characteristics. _Avoid_: API, signature (too narrow, they refer only to the type-level surface).
**Implementation**: what's inside a module, its body of code. Distinct from **Adapter**: a thing can be a small adapter with a large implementation (a Postgres repo) or a large adapter with a small implementation (an in-memory fake). Reach for "adapter" when the seam is the topic; "implementation" otherwise.
**Depth**: leverage at the interface. The amount of behaviour a caller (or test) can exercise per unit of interface they have to learn. A module is **deep** when a large amount of behaviour sits behind a small interface, **shallow** when the interface is nearly as complex as the implementation.
**Seam** _(Michael Feathers)_: a place where you can alter behaviour without editing in that place; the *location* at which a module's interface lives. Where to put the seam is its own design decision, distinct from what goes behind it. _Avoid_: boundary (overloaded with DDD's bounded context).
**Adapter**: a concrete thing that satisfies an interface at a seam. Describes *role* (what slot it fills), not substance (what's inside).
**Leverage**: what callers get from depth. More capability per unit of interface they learn. One implementation pays back across N call sites and M tests.
**Locality**: what maintainers get from depth. Change, bugs, knowledge, and verification concentrate in one place rather than spreading across callers. Fix once, fixed everywhere.
## Deep vs shallow
**Deep module** = small interface + lots of implementation:
```
┌─────────────────────┐
│ Small Interface │ ← Few methods, simple params
├─────────────────────┤
│ │
│ Deep Implementation│ ← Complex logic hidden
│ │
└─────────────────────┘
```
**Shallow module** = large interface + little implementation (avoid):
```
┌─────────────────────────────────┐
│ Large Interface │ ← Many methods, complex params
├─────────────────────────────────┤
│ Thin Implementation │ ← Just passes through
└─────────────────────────────────┘
```
When designing an interface, ask:
- Can I reduce the number of methods?
- Can I simplify the parameters?
- Can I hide more complexity inside?
## Principles
- **Depth is a property of the interface, not the implementation.** A deep module can be internally composed of small, mockable, swappable parts; they just aren't part of the interface. A module can have **internal seams** (private to its implementation, used by its own tests) as well as the **external seam** at its interface.
- **The deletion test.** Imagine deleting the module. If complexity vanishes, it was a pass-through. If complexity reappears across N callers, it was earning its keep.
- **The interface is the test surface.** Callers and tests cross the same seam. If you want to test *past* the interface, the module is probably the wrong shape.
- **One adapter means a hypothetical seam. Two adapters means a real one.** Don't introduce a seam unless something actually varies across it.
## Designing for testability
Good interfaces make testing natural:
1. **Accept dependencies, don't create them.**
```typescript
// Testable
function processOrder(order, paymentGateway) {}
// Hard to test
function processOrder(order) {
const gateway = new StripeGateway();
}
```
2. **Return results, don't produce side effects.**
```typescript
// Testable
function calculateDiscount(cart): Discount {}
// Hard to test
function applyDiscount(cart): void {
cart.total -= discount;
}
```
3. **Small surface area.** Fewer methods = fewer tests needed. Fewer params = simpler test setup.
## Relationships
- A **Module** has exactly one **Interface** (the surface it presents to callers and tests).
- **Depth** is a property of a **Module**, measured against its **Interface**.
- A **Seam** is where a **Module**'s **Interface** lives.
- An **Adapter** sits at a **Seam** and satisfies the **Interface**.
- **Depth** produces **Leverage** for callers and **Locality** for maintainers.
## Rejected framings
- **Depth as ratio of implementation-lines to interface-lines** (Ousterhout): rewards padding the implementation. We use depth-as-leverage instead.
- **"Interface" as the TypeScript `interface` keyword or a class's public methods**: too narrow: interface here includes every fact a caller must know.
- **"Boundary"**: overloaded with DDD's bounded context. Say **seam** or **interface**.
## Going deeper
- **Deepening a cluster given its dependencies**, see [DEEPENING.md](DEEPENING.md): dependency categories, seam discipline, and replace-don't-layer testing.
- **Exploring alternative interfaces**, see [DESIGN-IT-TWICE.md](DESIGN-IT-TWICE.md): spin up parallel sub-agents to design the interface several radically different ways, then compare on depth, locality, and seam placement.From kashman001/ai-workspace-template, MIT.
More from kashman001/ai-workspace-template
- 0.570score
constraint-driven-development
kashman001
Write a project's quality bar into CONSTRAINTS.md and flag changes that quietly lower it (new suppressions, skipped tests, stripped assertions, thresholds…
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.565score
doubt-driven-development
kashman001
Subject each non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.565score
create-work-item
kashman001
Scaffold a new developer-scoped project directory under work/ that follows the work-directory conventions (README + launcher next-session.md + ledger…
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.561score
doc-review
kashman001
Multi-perspective review of a technical document: audience gate first, six independent reviewer subagents, findings synthesized into prioritized…
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.560score
decision-log
kashman001
Capture the why behind a decision (choice, rejected alternative, constraint) as a commit trailer, a Tier-2 note in work/<project>/decisions.md, or a promoted…
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.557score
checkpoint
kashman001
Wrap up a finished chunk of work: reconcile the backlog, memory and docs, write the hand-off, confirm a clean branch, and emit a catch-up prompt for the next…
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.557score
design-for-testability
kashman001
Advisory six-question interrogation of a design: how will we test it, how does it fail, what is observable, and what is the cheapest check that proves it works.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.544score
diagnosing-bugs
kashman001
Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.544score
git-guardrails-claude-code
kashman001
Set up Claude Code hooks to block dangerous git commands (push, reset --hard, clean, branch -D, etc.) before they execute.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.541score
create-verification-skill
kashman001
Generate a project-local verification skill that drives your app the way a user does — any language, framework, or platform.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.539score
benchmark-checklist
kashman001
Vet a perf measurement (limiter, tuning, limits, errors, repeatability, relevance, and whether the work happened) before you report or act on it.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.539score
domain-modeling
kashman001
Build and sharpen a project's domain model.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Oct 9, 2026 (19 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from kashman001
- 0.570score
constraint-driven-development
kashman001
Write a project's quality bar into CONSTRAINTS.md and flag changes that quietly lower it (new suppressions, skipped tests, stripped assertions, thresholds…
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.565score
create-work-item
kashman001
Scaffold a new developer-scoped project directory under work/ that follows the work-directory conventions (README + launcher next-session.md + ledger…
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.565score
doubt-driven-development
kashman001
Subject each non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.561score
doc-review
kashman001
Multi-perspective review of a technical document: audience gate first, six independent reviewer subagents, findings synthesized into prioritized…
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.560score
decision-log
kashman001
Capture the why behind a decision (choice, rejected alternative, constraint) as a commit trailer, a Tier-2 note in work/<project>/decisions.md, or a promoted…
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.557score
checkpoint
kashman001
Wrap up a finished chunk of work: reconcile the backlog, memory and docs, write the hand-off, confirm a clean branch, and emit a catch-up prompt for the next…
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9
Cite this page
codebase-design skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/kashman001-codebase-design (last updated 2026-10-24)