using-the-harness
Session-start orientation for this team harness.
Skill by jpantsjoha
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/jpantsjoha-using-the-harness
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: documents, agent-building
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md and code. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/using-the-harness
What's inside
- Skill name
using-the-harness- Description
- Session-start orientation for this team harness. Load first, before any work. Explains the operating contract, when each skill triggers, and how installed companion plugins supply agent-craft capabilities while this harness supplies the team contract. Trigger at the start of every session and whenever unsure which skill applies.
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Instructions
- 120 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (2)
- SKILL.md
- antigravity-tools.md · references/
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Using the Harness This is a **team operating harness**: one shared contract for humans and AI agents working in the same repository — same rules, same risk tiers, same evidence, same definition of done. It exists to make a mixed human–AI team coherent, not to make one agent faster. A skill supplies a repeatable procedure. It never supplies permission or accountability. ## First actions, every session 1. **Ground in the contract.** If this project has adopted the operating model, read its project profile before anything else (`docs/operating-model/PROJECT-OPERATING-PROFILE.md`), then the manual it binds. Profile facts beat inference. 2. **Classify risk before acting.** Map the requested work to R0–R3. Round ambiguity upward. Confirm authority at that tier before any consequential, destructive, external, or credential-touching action. 3. **Route before doing.** Check the routing table below. If a skill applies to the work, use it. If you are unsure which applies, use `delivery-orchestrator`. The shared plugin is provider-neutral. Host adapters implement invocation; the project profile selects authorised reviewers, subscriptions and budgets. Independent Council review is a capability, not a fixed roster. See the [review contract](../pr-reviewer/references/independent-council.md). ## Installation and project adoption A user-level installation makes the skills available across that user’s projects; a project installation shares a selected baseline with collaborators. Neither creates project authority. Use the host’s selected skill location, including bundled references and scripts, without assuming a copied `.agents/skills/` directory. For a new adoption, route to `operating-model-bootstrap` from the consumer project. Ground its project-owned vision, workflow and profile: ticket system, owners, model selection, executable checks, review, release and observation. Existing records and explicit operator authority take precedence. Load detailed skills when needed; an unadopted project needs orientation and an adoption path, not the full delivery process. ## Core invariants — not negotiable - **Classify risk before confirming authority.** Approval is scoped to actual risk. - **Infer intent; never infer permission.** Useful intent is not a grant of authority. - **Receipts, not polish.** Produce an artefact or a pass/fail verdict, not a narrative. - **Review binds to the exact candidate.** Any change after review invalidates it. - **`seed` is not `active`.** A seed profile supports design and R0/R1 work only. - **Never invent a project fact.** Unknowns get an owner and a resolving trigger. - **Insufficient evidence is a stop, not a prompt to improvise.** Tag the roster role that owns the decision; silence never converts to permission. ## Skill routing | Work in front of you | Skill | |---|---| | New repo, or operating model install/repair | `operating-model-bootstrap` | | Multi-track epic, or "which skill applies?" | `delivery-orchestrator` | | An agreed goal to drive to a working, merged outcome while the operator is away | `get-it-done` | | The machine is slow, tests or browser skills left processes behind | `system-performance-guardrail` | | Is everything live, any errors this week, the weekly SRE checkup of a GCP project | `cloud-checkup` | | Is the page fast enough, Core Web Vitals, why is this route slow | `frontend-performance-audit` | | Vision, requirements, user journeys and product acceptance | `product-owner` | | Material strategic, cost/risk or operating ownership decision | `cxo-oversight` | | Acceptance coverage and executable user-path checks | `test-strategy` | | Significant technical decision or ADR | `the-architect` | | New feature, epic, or change — plan before code | `spec-first-delivery` | | High-stakes decision, or before claiming done | `adversarial-gate` | | Agent output feeding a decision, store, or another agent | `domain-validator` | | Any PR or agent-generated code before commit | `pr-reviewer` | | Anything about to ship to a real environment | `release-readiness` | | CI triggers, Actions billing, issues, labels, branch protection, or release-tag workflow | `github-manager` | | Release process governance: SemVer, ADR, changelog, release authority | `release-manager` | | Enterprise policy, compliance, governance, or approved-vendor alignment | `governance-guardrail` | | Status, standup, or situation report | `sitrep` | | Plugin-directory, marketplace, or curated-list submission | `plugin-submission` | | LLM/cloud cost estimate or architecture with LLM calls | `cost-guardrail` | | Google ADK multi-agent design | `adk-expert` | | Any cloud-vendor workload (GCP, AWS, Azure, Alibaba Cloud) | `cloud-expert` (`the-architect` routes) | | Adding or reviewing an MCP server | `mcp-server-scaffold` | ## Companion plugins Agent-craft capabilities may be provided by installed companion plugins instead of these skills — see `INTEGRATIONS.md` for the evaluated map (simplicity discipline, TDD methodology, frontend design review, and similar craft lanes). - Route craft work to an installed companion when the project profile names one as the provider. Do not re-implement a capability an installed companion already provides. - Companions supply capability, never authority. This harness's risk tiers, evidence, and review gates still apply to their output. - No companion installed? The baseline skills above are the fallback. Record the equivalent and its owner in the project profile; do not silently skip the capability. ## Harness tool mapping Skills name actions, not tools. The per-harness translation lives outside the canonical skill bodies: - **Antigravity (Gemini)** — read `references/antigravity-tools.md` (in this skill's directory) before acting; it maps subagent dispatch, task tracking, and file/search actions to Antigravity's native tools. - **Kimi Code** — the plugin manifest's `skillInstructions` carry the mapping. - **Claude Code / Codex** — the skills' action vocabulary resolves to the native tools of the same names. ## Anti-rationalization table | Excuse the agent makes | Counter | |---|---| | "The skills are just docs — I can skip them" | The skills are the harness. Skipping them is running without the contract. | | "This task is too small for a skill" | Gates are proportional to risk — R0/R1 is cheap. Skipped small gates are where big failures rehearse. | | "The companion plugin handles quality" | Companions own craft. Authority, evidence, and completion semantics stay here. | | "I'll edit the skill body to fit my tools" | Porting adds a thin adapter or tool mapping. Canonical skill bodies never change per harness. | | "I remember the contract from earlier" | Sessions compact and clear. Re-ground in the tracked profile; memory is not the contract. | | "The user seems in a hurry" | Speed is easy. Safe speed is engineered. Hurry raises risk tier, it does not lower it. | ## When unsure Route through `delivery-orchestrator`. Record every unresolved fact with an owner and the trigger that resolves it. Stop before any R2/R3 mutation or external action that lacks explicit authority and runnable controls.
From jpantsjoha/ai-native-developer-experience, Apache-2.0.
More from jpantsjoha/ai-native-developer-experience
- 0.641score
cloud-expert
jpantsjoha
Cloud guardrails for any vendor workload — Google Cloud (GCP, Vertex AI, GKE), AWS (IAM, EKS, Bedrock), Azure (Entra ID, Policy, AKS), Alibaba Cloud (RAM…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 13Claude Code +9 - 0.641score
cloud-checkup
jpantsjoha
Read-only SRE checkup of any GCP project: deterministic probes of the edge, Cloud Run services, 7-day error logs, Cloud Scheduler, alert policies and uptime…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 13Claude Code +9 - 0.641score
system-performance-guardrail
jpantsjoha
Measure, root-cause, fix, verify and record performance contention on a developer machine: cloud-sync daemons (iCloud Drive, OneDrive, Dropbox, Google Drive)…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 13Claude Code +9 - 0.641score
operating-model-bootstrap
jpantsjoha
Bootstrap or harden a project's operating model for mixed human and AI delivery teams.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 13Claude Code +9 - 0.641score
pr-reviewer
jpantsjoha
Review gate for correctness, reuse, and simplification.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 13Claude Code +9 - 0.638score
cost-guardrail
jpantsjoha
LLM and cloud cost awareness — model tiering, token budgets, right-sizing, and when a cheaper model suffices.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 13Claude Code +9 - 0.636score
mcp-server-scaffold
jpantsjoha
Scaffold and govern an MCP server as a bounded tool seam.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 13Claude Code +9 - 0.636score
the-architect
jpantsjoha
Architecture decisions, trade-off analysis, and ADR authoring.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 13Claude Code +9 - 0.636score
adversarial-gate
jpantsjoha
JP's signature red-team pass — "how would I break this?" Argue against your own approach before proceeding.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 13Claude Code +9 - 0.636score
delivery-orchestrator
jpantsjoha
Decompose an epic into atomic parallelizable tasks, route each to the right skill, and keep the four delivery records straight — issues, STATUS, ROADMAP…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 13Claude Code +9 - 0.636score
frontend-performance-audit
jpantsjoha
Measure real frontend performance — Core Web Vitals (LCP, CLS, INP), page-load traces, CPU and network throttling, Lighthouse accessibility/SEO scores, and…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 13Claude Code +9 - 0.636score
get-it-done
jpantsjoha
Pursue an agreed goal to a working outcome without waiting: decompose it, re-prioritise as evidence arrives, branch, gate, get an independent review (a…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 13Claude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 13
- Forks
- 4
- Open issues
- 2
- Last commit (this folder)
- Oct 16, 2026 (11 days ago)
- Last release
- Oct 16, 2026 (11 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Website
- jpantsjoha.com
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from jpantsjoha
- 0.641score
system-performance-guardrail
jpantsjoha
Measure, root-cause, fix, verify and record performance contention on a developer machine: cloud-sync daemons (iCloud Drive, OneDrive, Dropbox, Google Drive)…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 13Claude Code +9 - 0.641score
pr-reviewer
jpantsjoha
Review gate for correctness, reuse, and simplification.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 13Claude Code +9 - 0.641score
cloud-expert
jpantsjoha
Cloud guardrails for any vendor workload — Google Cloud (GCP, Vertex AI, GKE), AWS (IAM, EKS, Bedrock), Azure (Entra ID, Policy, AKS), Alibaba Cloud (RAM…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 13Claude Code +9 - 0.641score
operating-model-bootstrap
jpantsjoha
Bootstrap or harden a project's operating model for mixed human and AI delivery teams.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 13Claude Code +9 - 0.641score
cloud-checkup
jpantsjoha
Read-only SRE checkup of any GCP project: deterministic probes of the edge, Cloud Run services, 7-day error logs, Cloud Scheduler, alert policies and uptime…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 13Claude Code +9 - 0.638score
cost-guardrail
jpantsjoha
LLM and cloud cost awareness — model tiering, token budgets, right-sizing, and when a cheaper model suffices.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 13Claude Code +9
Cite this page
using-the-harness skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/jpantsjoha-using-the-harness (last updated 2026-10-24)