blindspot-pass
Inspect history and architecture for hidden constraints before risky cross-cutting changes.
Skill by jellydn
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/jellydn-blindspot-pass
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/blindspot-pass
What's inside
- Skill name
blindspot-pass- Description
- Inspect history and architecture for hidden constraints before risky cross-cutting changes.
- License
- MIT
- Compatibility
- cline, claude, opencode, amp, codex, gemini, cursor, pi
- Instructions
- 193 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (1)
- SKILL.md
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Blind Spot Pass ## When to Use Use this skill **before starting implementation** when: - Working on an unfamiliar part of the codebase - Integrating with systems you don't fully understand - The task has high stakes or complexity - You sense there might be hidden gotchas ## What It Does A blind spot pass helps identify **unknown unknowns** that could derail implementation or lead to poor architectural decisions. ## How to Execute ### Step 1: Define Scope Clearly state what you're about to work on: - Feature or change description - Affected modules/systems - Current understanding level ### Step 2: Search for Context Look in multiple places for relevant history: ```bash # Recent changes to related files git log --oneline --all -20 -- path/to/module/ # Search commit messages for keywords git log --all --grep="auth\|oauth\|provider" --oneline # Find related discussions in code comments rg -i "TODO|FIXME|HACK|XXX" path/to/module/ # Search for error handling patterns rg "catch|throw|error" path/to/module/ -A 3 ``` ### Step 3: Identify Gotchas Document findings in categories: **Technical Gotchas**: - Edge cases in existing code - Performance considerations - Error handling patterns - Testing requirements **Architectural Gotchas**: - Existing abstractions to follow - Integration points - Data flow patterns - State management approaches **Business Gotchas**: - Implicit requirements from past discussions - Feature flags or phased rollouts - Backward compatibility needs - Security or compliance requirements ### Step 4: Surface Questions Generate questions that would change the approach: - "I see error handling uses X pattern; should I follow it?" - "There's a feature flag system; does this need one?" - "Previous auth work had Y consideration; does that apply here?" ### Step 5: Present Findings Format as a structured report: ```markdown ## Blind Spot Analysis: [Task Name] ### Context Sources Checked - [x] Git history (last 3 months, 45 commits in auth/) - [x] Code comments and TODOs (found 3 relevant) - [x] Error handling patterns (uses Result type) - [x] Test coverage (integration tests in /tests/auth/) ### Key Findings **Architectural Patterns**: - All auth providers extend BaseOAuthProvider - Must implement 3 lifecycle hooks: init, authenticate, refresh - Config validation happens at provider registration **Known Gotchas**: - GitHub OAuth requires app installation per org (not per user) - Refresh tokens expire after 6 months of inactivity - Rate limiting uses Redis; need to handle connection failures **Testing Requirements**: - Mock responses in tests/fixtures/oauth/ - Integration tests use test credentials from .env.test - Must test token refresh flow explicitly ### Questions Before Proceeding 1. Should GitHub provider support org-level installation? 2. How should we handle rate limit failures? (retry? user error?) 3. Is there a preferred library for GitHub OAuth, or implement from scratch? ### Recommended Approach [Brief recommendation based on findings] ``` ## Example Usage ``` User: "I need to add Stripe payment integration to our checkout flow" Agent: "Let me do a blind spot pass first to identify unknowns."
From jellydn/my-ai-tools, MIT.
More from jellydn/my-ai-tools
- 0.722score
babysit-pr
jellydn
Use when monitoring an open GitHub PR for CI failures, review feedback, mergeability, and safe retries or fixes.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 123Claude Code +9 - 0.722score
visual-pr
jellydn
Posts a concise visual outline as a GitHub pull request comment.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 123Claude Code +9 - 0.716score
draft-pull-request
jellydn
Draft pull requests with structured descriptions using gh CLI
SkillAFreshness: A★ 123Claude Code +9 - 0.716score
codemap
jellydn
Create a seven-document architecture map when the user asks to map a codebase.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 123Claude Code +9 - 0.714score
diagnosing-bugs
jellydn
Build a tight, red-capable feedback loop before diagnosing failures, then minimize, test ranked hypotheses, and lock the fix with a regression test.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 123Claude Code +9 - 0.713score
pr-review
jellydn
Fix PR review comments by implementing requested changes
SkillAFreshness: A★ 123Claude Code +9 - 0.711score
implement-spec
jellydn
Implement a complete spec from its ticket graph, using isolated workers and one integration branch.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 123Claude Code +9 - 0.711score
portless-local
jellydn
Replace port numbers with stable named .localhost URLs for local development
SkillAFreshness: A★ 123Claude Code +9 - 0.711score
implementation-logger
jellydn
Log implementation decisions — tracks deviations from plan and captures rationale
SkillAFreshness: A★ 123Claude Code +9 - 0.711score
code-review
jellydn
Review a branch, PR, or worktree diff for repository conventions and stated intent.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 123Claude Code +9 - 0.711score
pr
jellydn
Write a fast-to-review pull request body with a visual summary, before/after evidence, and merge-risk analysis.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 123Claude Code +9 - 0.711score
plannotator-setup-goal
jellydn
Turn ideas into executable goal packages with guided interviews and codebase analysis
SkillAFreshness: A★ 123Claude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 123
- Forks
- 12
- Open issues
- 3
- Last commit (this folder)
- Oct 7, 2026 (21 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/jellydn/my-ai-tools
- Website
- ai-tools.itman.fyi/
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
Same skill elsewhere
Copies of this SKILL.md published by others; search shows only one of them.
More from jellydn
- 0.722score
babysit-pr
jellydn
Use when monitoring an open GitHub PR for CI failures, review feedback, mergeability, and safe retries or fixes.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 123Claude Code +9 - 0.722score
visual-pr
jellydn
Posts a concise visual outline as a GitHub pull request comment.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 123Claude Code +9 - 0.716score
codemap
jellydn
Create a seven-document architecture map when the user asks to map a codebase.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 123Claude Code +9 - 0.716score
draft-pull-request
jellydn
Draft pull requests with structured descriptions using gh CLI
SkillAFreshness: A★ 123Claude Code +9 - 0.714score
diagnosing-bugs
jellydn
Build a tight, red-capable feedback loop before diagnosing failures, then minimize, test ranked hypotheses, and lock the fix with a regression test.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 123Claude Code +9 - 0.713score
pr-review
jellydn
Fix PR review comments by implementing requested changes
SkillAFreshness: A★ 123Claude Code +9
Cite this page
blindspot-pass skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/jellydn-blindspot-pass (last updated 2026-10-24)