Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool

blindspot-pass

Inspect history and architecture for hidden constraints before risky cross-cutting changes.

Skill by jellydn

IndexedMIT★ 123
Write a review

Install

Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

npx agentmarket install skill/jellydn-blindspot-pass

Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

Inspect history and architecture for hidden constraints before risky cross-cutting changes.

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

Permissions

What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.

Tools
No tools found
Secrets
None asked for
Install scripts
None found

Network hosts it talks to 1

  • codeload.github.com · found in install command

Files it touches

  • ~/.claude/skills/blindspot-pass

What's inside

Skill name
blindspot-pass
Description
Inspect history and architecture for hidden constraints before risky cross-cutting changes.
License
MIT
Compatibility
cline, claude, opencode, amp, codex, gemini, cursor, pi
Instructions
193 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub

Files (1)

  • SKILL.md

SKILL.md (first lines)

# Blind Spot Pass

## When to Use

Use this skill **before starting implementation** when:
- Working on an unfamiliar part of the codebase
- Integrating with systems you don't fully understand
- The task has high stakes or complexity
- You sense there might be hidden gotchas

## What It Does

A blind spot pass helps identify **unknown unknowns** that could derail implementation or lead to poor architectural decisions.

## How to Execute

### Step 1: Define Scope

Clearly state what you're about to work on:
- Feature or change description
- Affected modules/systems
- Current understanding level

### Step 2: Search for Context

Look in multiple places for relevant history:

```bash
# Recent changes to related files
git log --oneline --all -20 -- path/to/module/

# Search commit messages for keywords
git log --all --grep="auth\|oauth\|provider" --oneline

# Find related discussions in code comments
rg -i "TODO|FIXME|HACK|XXX" path/to/module/

# Search for error handling patterns
rg "catch|throw|error" path/to/module/ -A 3
```

### Step 3: Identify Gotchas

Document findings in categories:

**Technical Gotchas**:
- Edge cases in existing code
- Performance considerations
- Error handling patterns
- Testing requirements

**Architectural Gotchas**:
- Existing abstractions to follow
- Integration points
- Data flow patterns
- State management approaches

**Business Gotchas**:
- Implicit requirements from past discussions
- Feature flags or phased rollouts
- Backward compatibility needs
- Security or compliance requirements

### Step 4: Surface Questions

Generate questions that would change the approach:

- "I see error handling uses X pattern; should I follow it?"
- "There's a feature flag system; does this need one?"
- "Previous auth work had Y consideration; does that apply here?"

### Step 5: Present Findings

Format as a structured report:

```markdown
## Blind Spot Analysis: [Task Name]

### Context Sources Checked
- [x] Git history (last 3 months, 45 commits in auth/)
- [x] Code comments and TODOs (found 3 relevant)
- [x] Error handling patterns (uses Result type)
- [x] Test coverage (integration tests in /tests/auth/)

### Key Findings

**Architectural Patterns**:
- All auth providers extend BaseOAuthProvider
- Must implement 3 lifecycle hooks: init, authenticate, refresh
- Config validation happens at provider registration

**Known Gotchas**:
- GitHub OAuth requires app installation per org (not per user)
- Refresh tokens expire after 6 months of inactivity
- Rate limiting uses Redis; need to handle connection failures

**Testing Requirements**:
- Mock responses in tests/fixtures/oauth/
- Integration tests use test credentials from .env.test
- Must test token refresh flow explicitly

### Questions Before Proceeding

1. Should GitHub provider support org-level installation?
2. How should we handle rate limit failures? (retry? user error?)
3. Is there a preferred library for GitHub OAuth, or implement from scratch?

### Recommended Approach

[Brief recommendation based on findings]
```

## Example Usage

```
User: "I need to add Stripe payment integration to our checkout flow"

Agent: "Let me do a blind spot pass first to identify unknowns."

From jellydn/my-ai-tools, MIT.

More from jellydn/my-ai-tools

Signals

Stars
123
Forks
12
Open issues
3
Last commit (this folder)
Oct 7, 2026 (21 days ago)

From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

Details

License
MIT
First seen
Oct 24, 2026
Last checked
Oct 24, 2026

Same skill elsewhere

Copies of this SKILL.md published by others; search shows only one of them.

More from jellydn

Cite this page

blindspot-pass skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/jellydn-blindspot-pass (last updated 2026-10-24)