Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/jehu-ce-compound
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: documents
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
- Runs as
- Python package
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/ce-compound
What's inside
- Skill name
ce-compound- Description
- Document a recently solved problem as a durable repo learning. Use when capturing a learning after work.
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 80 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Before installing
- Ships executable scripts
Files (28)
- SKILL.md
- resolution-template.md · assets/
- best-practices-researcher.md · references/agents/
- data-integrity-guardian.md · references/agents/
- framework-docs-researcher.md · references/agents/
- pattern-recognition-specialist.md · references/agents/
- performance-oracle.md · references/agents/
- security-sentinel.md · references/agents/
- session-historian.md · references/agents/
- assembly.md · references/
- concepts-vocabulary.md · references/
- enhancement.md · references/
- grounding-validation.md · references/
- lightweight.md · references/
- modes.md · references/
- refresh-and-discoverability.md · references/
- report.md · references/
- research.md · references/
- schema.yaml · references/
- session-history.md · references/
- yaml-schema.md · references/
- context.mjs · scripts/
- discover-sessions.sh · scripts/session-history/
- extract-errors.py · scripts/session-history/
- extract-metadata.py · scripts/session-history/
- extract-skeleton.py · scripts/session-history/
- validate-doc-claims.py · scripts/
- validate-frontmatter.py · scripts/
SKILL.md (first lines)
# /ce-compound
**Outcome:** one solved problem is written as a durable learning under `<root>/solutions/`, grounded against the current tree, discoverable by the next agent.
**Done:** the doc is written or updated, its frontmatter and claims validated, vocabulary capture recorded even when nothing qualified, and the mode's completion report emitted.
**One learning per run.** A session that produced several gets several sequential runs, never one batched run — `references/research.md` carries what batching breaks.
## Setup
Run this once per invocation, before any subagent dispatch, and follow the directives it prints. Where a printed directive conflicts with this skill's own rules on asking the user questions, this skill's rules win and no blocking question is asked. Run the fence exactly as written, as its own command — no piping, filtering, truncating, or batching. Its output starts `=== skill context` and ends with `CE_CONTEXT_END`. Seeing either marker without the other means the output was truncated, so run the fence again, verbatim, once. A later invocation runs its own.
```bash
SKILL_DIR="<absolute path of the directory containing the SKILL.md you just read>";
NODE="$(for c in node nodejs; do command -v "$c" >/dev/null 2>&1 && "$c" -e '' >/dev/null 2>&1 && { echo "$c"; break; }; done)";
if [ -n "$NODE" ]; then
"$NODE" "$SKILL_DIR/scripts/context.mjs" || echo "context script failed; continue with the skill's normal behavior";
else
echo "no Node runtime; continue with the skill's normal behavior";
fi
```
## Preconditions
Document a problem that is solved, verified working, and non-trivial. These are advisory: judge them from the session rather than asking about them. When the session plainly holds no such problem, write nothing and report why.
`ce-compound` is not a `CONCEPTS.md` bootstrap tool — it seeds the learning's own area as a side effect, never the whole repo. Send a standalone request to create or bootstrap that file to `ce-compound-refresh`, then exit.
## Mode Detection
```bash
/ce-compound [brief context]
/ce-compound mode:non-interactive depth:lightweight [context]
/ce-compound mode:non-interactive depth:full [context]
```
Enter non-interactive mode when **either** holds: the arguments you were invoked with contain the `mode:non-interactive` token or its deprecated alias `mode:headless`, **or** the invocation makes non-interactive intent unmistakable — a caller or standing instruction asking to run `ce-compound` "headless", "non-interactively", "unattended", or "without prompts/questions". Both tokens together is not a conflict. Bare "automatically" or "auto-run" is **not** on its own a non-interactive signal — it speaks to *invoking* the skill, not to suppressing its prompts — so an ambiguous or absent signal defaults to interactive. Tokens starting with `mode:` or `depth:` are flags, not context: strip them before treating the remainder as the brief context hint. Once detected, non-interactive mode applies for the entire run.
Depth is an explicit non-interactive-only selector, and at most one depth token is accepted. `depth:lightweight` routes directly to Lightweight Mode. `depth:full` or no depth token enters Full Mode, including its automatic session-history probe. A non-interactive call carrying no depth token therefore behaves as it always has. Non-interactive lightweight asks no blocking questions and launches no subagents. If the invocation carries an unknown `depth:` token, multiple `depth:` tokens, or a `depth:` token without non-interactive intent, do not guess: emit the non-interactive failure report with the reason and end with `Documentation skipped`.
**Non-interactive mode asks nothing** — no blocking question of any kind, in any phase, because a caller reaching this path has no human to answer one. Every non-interactive exit, including one taken before any phase runs, ends on a terminal signal a caller parses: `Documentation complete`, or `Documentation skipped` with the reason when no doc was written. Interactive mode asks only where the step's own reference says to, which is the Discoverability Check consent and, when several stale docs are in play, which refresh to run.
## Artifact Root
Resolve `<root>` when you first compose a `<root>/solutions/` path, and pass a subagent the resolved path rather than the config.
<!-- ce-docs-root:start -->
**Resolve the CE artifact root `<root>` before composing any artifact path.**
- **Read** `docs_root` from `<repo-root>/.compound-engineering/config.yaml` only (`<repo-root>` = `git rev-parse --show-toplevel`). Do not read it from `config.local.yaml`. Unset -> `<root>` is `docs`, exactly as before.
- **Validate** a set value: a repo-relative directory whose real, symlink-resolved path stays inside the repo and is neither the repo root nor under `.git/`. Otherwise stop with an error naming `docs_root` and the value -- never fall back to `docs`.
- **Use** `<root>` as the sole artifact location: create it if absent, compose each path as `<root>/<subdir>` with this skill's own subdirectory, and never also read `docs`.
<!-- ce-docs-root:end -->
## Write boundary
**Only the orchestrator writes product files.** Phase 1 subagents write to per-run scratch only, and never touch `<root>/`, project instruction files, or any other tracked path.
The orchestrator writes the one learning under `<root>/solutions/`, plus two maintenance side effects its own step governs: `CONCEPTS.md` during vocabulary capture, and — **only in interactive Full mode after consent** — a small discoverability line in a project instruction file. Creating `CONCEPTS.md` when it is absent is expected rather than a violation. An instruction file is only ever edited, never created. Nothing else in the tree is written: edits to *other* docs belong to `ce-compound-refresh`, which this skill recommends or invokes with a narrow scope but never stands in for.
## Choosing the path
**Read `references/modes.md` before step 1.** An interactive run picks its own depth rather than asking the user, and that reference says why neither the depth choice nor session history is a question. Default to **Full**. Choose **Lightweight** only under real context pressure: the session is near its context limit, or the fix is trivial enough that cross-referencing would add nothing. In non-interactive mode, skip the choice and run the depth from Mode Detection.
Lightweight mode skips session history entirely; non-interactive Full runs the same automatic probe, which asks nothing and so preserves the non-interactive contract.
## Full Mode
Run these in order. Each reference is a required read at the step that names it.
1. **Research** — read `references/research.md`.
2. **Session history** — read `references/session-history.md`, and start it *after* launching the parallel block so the two overlap rather than serialize. Session history is the final Phase 1 input, not a workflow stop. When it returns, including with "no relevant prior sessions", go straight to assembly without pausing or summarizing.
3. **Assembly and write** — wait for every Phase 1 input, then read `references/assembly.md`.
4. **Refresh check and discoverability** — read `references/refresh-and-discoverability.md`.
5. **Optional enhancement** — read `references/enhancement.md`. Interactive only.
6. **Report** — read `references/report.md` for the shape your mode owes, then end the turn.
**Lightweight Mode** replaces steps 1-6 with a single pass; read `references/lightweight.md`, which owns its own completion output for both modes.From Jehu/a0_compound_engineering, MIT.
More from Jehu/a0_compound_engineering
- 0.552score
ce-brainstorm
Jehu
Explore vague or ambitious ideas into a right-sized requirements-only unified plan.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.552score
ce-code-review
Jehu
Structured code review for bugs, regressions, tests, and standards.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.552score
ce-explain
Jehu
Create a durable visual teaching artifact for something worth learning.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.552score
ce-pov
Jehu
Give a decisive, project-grounded point of view: a graded verdict on an external-adoption question, a holistic take on a document, or a position on a supplied…
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.551score
ce-optimize
Jehu
Run metric-driven optimization loops.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.551score
ce-debug
Jehu
Diagnosis loop for bugs and failing behavior.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.546score
ce-polish
Jehu
Start the dev server, inspect the feature in browser, and iterate on polish.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.543score
ce-promote
Jehu
Draft launch or promotion copy for a shipped feature.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.542score
ce-product-pulse
Jehu
Generate time-windowed product pulse reports from configured signals.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.539score
ce-a0-harness-notes
Jehu
Agent Zero harness mapping for Compound Engineering (ce-*) skills.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Aug 19, 2026 (2 months ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/Jehu/a0_compound_engineering
- Website
- www.ki-beratung-michely.de
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from Jehu
- 0.561score
workspace-window-title
Jehu
Explain or manage the Workspace Window Title plugin when asked about workspace names in BB window or browser-tab titles.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.552score
ce-pov
Jehu
Give a decisive, project-grounded point of view: a graded verdict on an external-adoption question, a holistic take on a document, or a position on a supplied…
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.552score
ce-code-review
Jehu
Structured code review for bugs, regressions, tests, and standards.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.552score
ce-brainstorm
Jehu
Explore vague or ambitious ideas into a right-sized requirements-only unified plan.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.552score
ce-explain
Jehu
Create a durable visual teaching artifact for something worth learning.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.551score
ce-optimize
Jehu
Run metric-driven optimization loops.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9
Cite this page
ce-compound skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/jehu-ce-compound (last updated 2026-10-24)