to-tickets

Files (2)

• SKILL.md
• openai.yaml · agents/

SKILL.md (first lines)

# To Tickets

Break a plan, spec, or conversation into a set of **tickets** — tracer-bullet vertical slices, each declaring the tickets that **block** it.

The issue tracker and triage label vocabulary should have been provided to you — run `/setup-skills` if not.

## Process

### 1. Gather context

Work from the **active change**: read its `proposal.md`, its delta specs and its `design.md`. The delta specs are the thing you're slicing — every requirement in them has to end up covered by some ticket.

If the user passes a reference (a change id, a spec path, an issue number or URL) as an argument, fetch it and read its full body and comments. With no change and no reference, work from whatever is already in the conversation context.

Run this **after the proposal has merged**. Slicing an unmerged proposal produces tickets for work that may still move.

### 2. Explore the codebase (optional)

If you have not already explored the codebase, do so to understand the current state of the code. Ticket titles and descriptions should use the project's domain glossary vocabulary, and respect ADRs in the area you're touching.

Look for opportunities to prefactor the code to make the implementation easier. "Make the change easy, then make the easy change."

### 3. Draft vertical slices

Break the work into **tracer bullet** tickets.

<vertical-slice-rules>

- Each slice cuts a narrow but COMPLETE path through every layer (schema, API, UI, tests) — vertical, NOT a horizontal slice of one layer
- A completed slice is demoable or verifiable on its own
- Each slice is sized to fit in a single fresh context window
- Any prefactoring should be done first

</vertical-slice-rules>

Give each ticket its **blocking edges** — the other tickets that must complete before it can start. A ticket with no blockers can start immediately.

**Wide refactors are the exception to vertical slicing.** A **wide refactor** is one mechanical change — rename a column, retype a shared symbol — whose **blast radius** fans across the whole codebase, so a single edit breaks thousands of call sites at once and no vertical slice can land green. Don't force it into a tracer bullet; sequence it as **expand–contract**. First expand: add the new form beside the old so nothing breaks. Then migrate the call sites over in batches sized by blast radius (per package, per directory), each batch its own ticket blocked by the expand, keeping CI green batch to batch because the old form still exists. Finally contract: delete the old form once no caller remains, in a ticket blocked by every migrate batch. When even the batches can't stay green alone, keep the sequence but let them share an integration branch that all block a final integrate-and-verify ticket — green is promised only there.

### 4. Quiz the user

Present the proposed breakdown as a numbered list. For each ticket, show:

- **Title**: short descriptive name
- **Blocked by**: which other tickets (if any) must complete first
- **What it delivers**: the end-to-end behaviour this ticket makes work

Ask the user:

- Does the granularity feel right? (too coarse / too fine)
- Are the blocking edges correct — does each ticket only depend on tickets that genuinely gate it?
- Should any tickets be merged or split further?

Iterate until the user approves the breakdown.

### 5. Write the tickets into `tasks.md`

`tasks.md` in the active change is the **source of truth** for what this change is made of, and it archives with the change. Write every approved ticket there as a checklist item, in dependency order (blockers first), numbered from `01`, each carrying its "Blocked by".

If there is no active change — the work didn't come through `/to-spec` — skip to step 6 and treat the tracker as the source of truth instead.

### 6. Publish one issue per ticket

Cut each ticket from `tasks.md` into an issue on the tracker `/setup-skills` configured. The tickets are the same either way; only the shape of the blocking edges changes:

- **A real issue tracker (GitHub, GitLab, Linear, …)** → publish one issue per ticket in dependency order (blockers first) so each ticket's blocking edges can reference real identifiers. Use the platform's native blocking / sub-issue relationship where it has one; otherwise set each ticket's "Blocked by" to the blocking issues. Apply the `ready-for-agent` triage label unless instructed otherwise — the tickets are agent-grabbable by construction. **Write each issue's reference back into its `tasks.md` item**, so the two stay one-to-one.
- **Local markdown** → stop at `tasks.md`. It is already a local markdown checklist; a second copy under `.scratch/` would be the duplication the source-of-truth rule exists to prevent. If there's no active change either, write one file per ticket under `.scratch/<feature-slug>/issues/<NN>-<slug>.md` using the template below — one ticket per file, never a single combined file.

A box in `tasks.md` is ticked when its issue closes, not when its code is written. `/change-review` reconciles `tasks.md` against the tracker before it archives, so a box nobody remembered to tick is caught there rather than quietly dropping work out of the change.

Work the **frontier**: any ticket whose blockers are all done. For a purely linear chain that means top to bottom.

Do NOT close or modify any parent issue.

<local-ticket-template>

# <NN> — <Ticket title>

**What to build:** the end-to-end behaviour this ticket makes work, from the user's perspective — not a layer-by-layer implementation list.

**Blocked by:** the numbers/titles of the tickets that gate this one, or "None — can start immediately".

**Status:** ready-for-agent

- [ ] Acceptance criterion 1
- [ ] Acceptance criterion 2

</local-ticket-template>

<issue-template>

## Parent

A reference to the parent issue on the tracker (if the source was an existing issue, otherwise omit this section).

## What to build

The end-to-end behaviour this ticket makes work, from the user's perspective — not layer-by-layer implementation.

## Acceptance criteria

- [ ] Criterion 1
- [ ] Criterion 2

## Blocked by

- A reference to each blocking ticket, or "None — can start immediately".

</issue-template>

In either form, avoid specific file paths or code snippets — they go stale fast. Exception: if a prototype produced a snippet that encodes a decision more precisely than prose can (state machine, reducer, schema, type shape), inline it and note briefly that it came from a prototype. Trim to the decision-rich parts — not a working demo, just the important bits.

From jackey8616/skills, MIT.

More from jackey8616/skills