Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool

pricing-test

Test 3-8 price points on CRM-grounded synthetic panels by script, find the optimum.

Skill by indranilbanerjee

IndexedMIT★ 909
Write a review

Install

Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

npx agentmarket install skill/indranilbanerjee-pricing-test

Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

Test 3-8 price points on CRM-grounded synthetic panels by script, find the optimum. "test these price points"

Use cases: testing, sales

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

Permissions

What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md and code. Checked Oct 25, 2026.

Tools
No tools found
Secrets
None asked for
Install scripts
None found

Network hosts it talks to 1

  • codeload.github.com · found in install command

Files it touches

  • ~/.claude/skills/pricing-test

What's inside

Skill name
pricing-test
Description
Test 3-8 price points on CRM-grounded synthetic panels by script, find the optimum. "test these price points"
License
MIT
Instructions
47 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub

Files (1)

  • SKILL.md

SKILL.md (first lines)

# /digital-marketing-pro:pricing-test

> **Script location.** If your host does not set `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}`, the scripts are in this plugin's `scripts/` folder, next to `skills/`. Run them with Python 3.10 or newer: `python`, or `python3` where `python` is not found (macOS, many Linux systems).

## Purpose

Test pricing scenarios against synthetic audience panels grounded in real CRM data. Estimate willingness-to-pay by segment, find optimal price points, acceptable price ranges, and the spread between revenue-maximizing and volume-maximizing prices. This command brings Van Westendorp and Gabor-Granger style pricing analysis to AI-simulated panels — giving directional pricing intelligence without the cost and lead time of formal pricing research. Use it before launching a new product, adjusting existing pricing, introducing tiers, or evaluating competitive price positioning. Every output includes confidence limitations so results are treated as informed estimates requiring real-world validation for high-stakes pricing decisions.

## Input Required

The user must provide (or will be prompted for):

- **Product or service description**: What is being priced — features, value proposition, target use case, and any relevant context about how customers perceive the offering. The more specific the description, the more grounded the synthetic panel's price sensitivity responses will be
- **Price points to test**: 3-8 specific price points to evaluate across the audience panel. Price points should span a meaningful range — from a low-anchor price the user suspects is too cheap to a high-anchor price they suspect is too expensive. Evenly spaced intervals work best for identifying sensitivity curves
- **Audience panel**: An existing panel ID from a previous session, or new segment definitions to build from CRM data. Segments should represent meaningfully different buyer types — budget-conscious vs premium, small vs enterprise, new vs loyal — since pricing sensitivity varies dramatically across segments
- **Current price (for reference)**: The existing price point if the product is already on the market. Used as a reference anchor for measuring price change impact on each segment. For new products, omit or provide the price the user is leaning toward
- **Competitive pricing context (optional)**: Known competitor prices for similar products or services. When provided, the analysis includes competitive positioning assessment — where each test price point falls relative to competitors and how that positioning affects each segment's perceived value

## Process

1. **Load brand context**: Read `~/.claude-marketing/brands/_active-brand.json` for the active slug, then load `~/.claude-marketing/brands/{slug}/profile.json`. Apply brand positioning, perceived brand premium or discount, target market income and spending profiles, and competitive landscape. Also check for guidelines at `~/.claude-marketing/brands/{slug}/guidelines/_manifest.json` — if present, load restrictions. Check for agency SOPs at `~/.claude-marketing/sops/`. If no brand exists, ask: "Set up a brand first (/digital-marketing-pro:brand-setup)?" — or proceed with defaults.
2. **Load audience panel**: Reference the existing panel by its ID (list available panels with `python "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/audience-simulator.py" --brand {slug} --action list-panels`), or create a new panel via `python "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/audience-simulator.py" --brand {slug} --action create-panel --panel-name {name} --segments '[...]'` with CRM data grounding if new segment definitions were provided. Ensure segments include spending behavior and price sensitivity indicators from CRM purchase history.
3. **Test pricing across segments**: Run `python "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/audience-simulator.py" --brand {slug} --action test-pricing --panel-id {id} --price-points '[...]' --product-description "..."` for each price point against each segment. For every segment-price combination, estimate purchase likelihood, perceived value rating, price-quality inference (too cheap signals low quality, too expensive signals exclusion), and emotional response (excited about value, comfortable, hesitant, or rejected).
4. **Calculate optimal pricing**: From the segment-level responses, calculate the optimal price point (highest combined score of purchase likelihood and margin), acceptable price range (floor where quality perception drops, ceiling where purchase likelihood collapses), revenue-maximizing price (price times predicted conversion, optimized for total revenue), and volume-maximizing price (highest predicted conversion regardless of margin).
5. **Compare to competitive pricing**: If competitive pricing context was provided, map each test price point to its competitive position — below market, at market, or above market — and assess how that positioning interacts with each segment's brand perception and price sensitivity. Identify segments where premium pricing is defensible and segments where competitive parity or undercut pricing drives significantly higher conversion.
6. **Generate pricing strategy recommendations**: Synthesize the analysis into actionable pricing recommendations — single optimal price if one price fits all segments, tiered pricing structure if segments have divergent willingness-to-pay, introductory pricing strategy if launching new, and competitive positioning rationale. Include confidence caveats and recommended real-world validation methods.

## Output

A structured pricing analysis containing:

- **Price sensitivity analysis per segment**: For each segment, the purchase likelihood curve across all tested price points, perceived value ratings, price-quality inference thresholds, and the segment-specific acceptable price range
- **Optimal price point**: The single price point that maximizes the combined score of purchase likelihood, margin, and cross-segment acceptance — with explanation of what drives this optimum
- **Acceptable price range**: The floor (below which quality perception drops and brand damage risk increases) and ceiling (above which purchase likelihood drops below viable conversion rates) defining the safe pricing zone
- **Revenue-maximizing price**: The price point that maximizes predicted total revenue (price times predicted conversion volume) — typically higher than the volume-maximizing price with lower but more profitable conversion
- **Volume-maximizing price**: The price point that maximizes predicted unit sales or sign-ups — typically lower, optimizing for market penetration and customer acquisition over immediate margin
- **Per-segment willingness-to-pay**: Each segment's sweet spot, maximum acceptable price, and price at which they switch to a competitor or substitute — revealing whether a single price serves all segments or tiered pricing is needed
- **Competitive positioning**: Where the recommended price points fall relative to competitors, which segments are most influenced by competitive pricing, and where premium positioning is defensible versus where it causes attrition
- **Pricing strategy recommendations**: Actionable recommendations — single price, tiered pricing, introductory pricing, or competitive positioning strategy — with rationale grounded in the segment analysis and competitive context
- **Confidence level and limitations**: Explicit confidence rating with explanation of what synthetic pricing tests can and cannot predict — directional sensitivity patterns are reliable, exact conversion rates at each price point are not. Recommendations for real-world validation including conjoint analysis, live A/B price tests, or survey-based willingness-to-pay studies

## Agents Used

- **marketing-strategist** — Pricing strategy framework design, competitive positioning analysis against market pricing data, cross-segment pricing optimization balancing revenue and volume objectives, tiered pricing structure recommendations when segments diverge, and real-world validation planning for high-stakes pricing decisions
- **crm-manager** — CRM data extraction for purchase behavior and spending pattern grounding, segment-level price sensitivity indicators from historical transaction data, and customer lifetime value context for pricing decisions that account for long-term revenue not just initial conversion

From indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro, MIT.

More from indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro

Compare and alternatives

    Featured in

    Signals

    Stars
    909
    Forks
    146
    Open issues
    0
    Last commit (this folder)
    Oct 11, 2026 (16 days ago)
    Last release
    Jul 29, 2026 (3 months ago)

    From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

    Details

    License
    MIT
    First seen
    Oct 24, 2026
    Last checked
    Oct 24, 2026

    More from indranilbanerjee

    Cite this page

    pricing-test skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/indranilbanerjee-pricing-test (last updated 2026-10-24)