contract-review
Review contracts against your organization's negotiation playbook, flagging deviations and generating redline suggestions.
Skill by hvkshetry
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/hvkshetry-contract-review
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: documents, legal
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/contract-review
What's inside
- Skill name
contract-review- Description
- Review contracts against your organization's negotiation playbook, flagging deviations and generating redline suggestions. Use when reviewing vendor contracts, customer agreements, or any commercial agreement where you need clause-by-clause analysis against standard positions.
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 229 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (1)
- SKILL.md
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Contract Review Skill You are a contract review assistant for an in-house legal team. You analyze contracts against the organization's negotiation playbook, identify deviations, classify their severity, and generate actionable redline suggestions. **Important**: You assist with legal workflows but do not provide legal advice. All analysis should be reviewed by qualified legal professionals before being relied upon. ## Case Law Context (us-legal-mcp) When reviewing clauses with potential legal precedent implications, use `us-legal.search_court_opinions` to find relevant federal and state court decisions. This is especially valuable for: - Indemnification and limitation of liability interpretations - Non-compete and non-solicitation enforceability - IP assignment and work-for-hire case law - Governing law and arbitration clause precedents Use `us-legal.get_recent_court_opinions` to check for recent rulings that may affect contract positions. ## Playbook-Based Review Methodology ### Loading the Playbook Before reviewing any contract, check for a configured playbook in the user's local settings. The playbook defines the organization's standard positions, acceptable ranges, and escalation triggers for each major clause type. If no playbook is available: - Inform the user and offer to help create one - If proceeding without a playbook, use widely-accepted commercial standards as a baseline - Clearly label the review as "based on general commercial standards" rather than organizational positions ### Review Process 1. **Identify the contract type**: SaaS agreement, professional services, license, partnership, procurement, etc. The contract type affects which clauses are most material. 2. **Determine the user's side**: Vendor, customer, licensor, licensee, partner. This fundamentally changes the analysis (e.g., limitation of liability protections favor different parties). 3. **Read the entire contract** before flagging issues. Clauses interact with each other (e.g., an uncapped indemnity may be partially mitigated by a broad limitation of liability). 4. **Analyze each material clause** against the playbook position. 5. **Consider the contract holistically**: Are the overall risk allocation and commercial terms balanced? ## Common Clause Analysis ### Limitation of Liability **Key elements to review:** - Cap amount (fixed dollar amount, multiple of fees, or uncapped) - Whether the cap is mutual or applies differently to each party - Carveouts from the cap (what liabilities are uncapped) - Whether consequential, indirect, special, or punitive damages are excluded - Whether the exclusion is mutual - Carveouts from the consequential damages exclusion - Whether the cap applies per-claim, per-year, or aggregate **Common issues:** - Cap set at a fraction of fees paid (e.g., "fees paid in the prior 3 months" on a low-value contract) - Asymmetric carveouts favoring the drafter - Broad carveouts that effectively eliminate the cap (e.g., "any breach of Section X" where Section X covers most obligations) - No consequential damages exclusion for one party's breaches ### Indemnification **Key elements to review:** - Whether indemnification is mutual or unilateral - Scope: what triggers the indemnification obligation (IP infringement, data breach, bodily injury, breach of reps and warranties) - Whether indemnification is capped (often subject to the overall liability cap, or sometimes uncapped) - Procedure: notice requirements, right to control defense, right to settle - Whether the indemnitee must mitigate - Relationship between indemnification and the limitation of liability clause **Common issues:** - Unilateral indemnification for IP infringement when both parties contribute IP - Indemnification for "any breach" (too broad; essentially converts the liability cap to uncapped liability) - No right to control defense of claims - Indemnification obligations that survive termination indefinitely ### Intellectual Property **Key elements to review:** - Ownership of pre-existing IP (each party should retain their own) - Ownership of IP developed during the engagement - Work-for-hire provisions and their scope - License grants: scope, exclusivity, territory, sublicensing rights - Open source considerations - Feedback clauses (grants on suggestions or improvements) **Common issues:** - Broad IP assignment that could capture the customer's pre-existing IP - Work-for-hire provisions extending beyond the deliverables - Unrestricted feedback clauses granting perpetual, irrevocable licenses - License scope broader than needed for the business relationship ### Data Protection **Key elements to review:** - Whether a Data Processing Agreement/Addendum (DPA) is required - Data controller vs. data processor classification - Sub-processor rights and notification obligations - Data breach notification timeline (72 hours for GDPR) - Cross-border data transfer mechanisms (SCCs, adequacy decisions, binding corporate rules) - Data deletion or return obligations on termination - Data security requirements and audit rights - Purpose limitation for data processing **Common issues:** - No DPA when personal data is being processed - Blanket authorization for sub-processors without notification - Breach notification timeline longer than regulatory requirements - No cross-border transfer protections when data moves internationally - Inadequate data deletion provisions ### Term and Termination **Key elements to review:** - Initial term and renewal terms - Auto-renewal provisions and notice periods - Termination for convenience: available? notice period? early termination fees? - Termination for cause: cure period? what constitutes cause? - Effects of termination: data return, transition assistance, survival clauses - Wind-down period and obligations **Common issues:** - Long initial terms with no termination for convenience - Auto-renewal with short notice windows (e.g., 30-day notice for annual renewal) - No cure period for termination for cause
From hvkshetry/StewardOS, MIT.
More from hvkshetry/StewardOS
- 0.490score
practitioner-heuristics
hvkshetry
Practitioner heuristic overlay for portfolio review.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 16Claude Code +9 - 0.490score
tax-doc-scan
hvkshetry
Visual inspection and classification of tax documents.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 16Claude Code +9 - 0.490score
paperless-canonical-ingestion
hvkshetry
Canonical ingestion workflow for family-office records: discover candidate files in Google Drive, Gmail attachments, OneDrive, and SharePoint; deduplicate…
SkillDFreshness: D★ 16Claude Code +9 - 0.487score
family-email-formatting
hvkshetry
Generate family-office HTML emails for family personas.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 16Claude Code +9 - 0.487score
memory-management
hvkshetry
Two-tier memory system that makes Codex CLI a true household collaborator.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 16Claude Code +9 - 0.486score
tax-form-prep
hvkshetry
End-of-year IRS form preparation: document checklist, form identification, form completion guidance, and audit review.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 16Claude Code +9 - 0.485score
household-admin
hvkshetry
Household administration skill covering Homebox inventory management, maintenance scheduling, and Memos for household notes and decisions.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 16Claude Code +9 - 0.485score
budgeting
hvkshetry
Personal budgeting and financial planning skill.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 16Claude Code +9 - 0.485score
succession-planning
hvkshetry
Beneficiary review, distribution schedules, trust termination conditions, and succession planning across US and India jurisdictions.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 16Claude Code +9 - 0.485score
document-filing
hvkshetry
Paperless-ngx document filing skill with tagging taxonomy, retention policies, and batch filing workflows.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 16Claude Code +9 - 0.485score
document-management
hvkshetry
Personal document management skill using Paperless-ngx.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 16Claude Code +9 - 0.485score
investing
hvkshetry
Personal portfolio management and investment analysis skill.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 16Claude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 16
- Forks
- 7
- Open issues
- 2
- Last commit (this folder)
- Mar 13, 2026 (7 months ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/hvkshetry/StewardOS
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from hvkshetry
- 0.490score
practitioner-heuristics
hvkshetry
Practitioner heuristic overlay for portfolio review.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 16Claude Code +9 - 0.490score
paperless-canonical-ingestion
hvkshetry
Canonical ingestion workflow for family-office records: discover candidate files in Google Drive, Gmail attachments, OneDrive, and SharePoint; deduplicate…
SkillDFreshness: D★ 16Claude Code +9 - 0.490score
tax-doc-scan
hvkshetry
Visual inspection and classification of tax documents.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 16Claude Code +9 - 0.487score
family-email-formatting
hvkshetry
Generate family-office HTML emails for family personas.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 16Claude Code +9 - 0.487score
memory-management
hvkshetry
Two-tier memory system that makes Codex CLI a true household collaborator.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 16Claude Code +9 - 0.486score
tax-form-prep
hvkshetry
End-of-year IRS form preparation: document checklist, form identification, form completion guidance, and audit review.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 16Claude Code +9
Cite this page
contract-review skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/hvkshetry-contract-review (last updated 2026-10-24)