facilitating-product-vision
Facilitates an owner-led product vision session and produces two artifacts: a strategy-only vision document plus roadmap items (outcome themes under…
Skill by hierovision
Chalk Labs
Need help deploying facilitating-product-vision?
Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/hierovision-facilitating-product-vision
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: documents, design
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/facilitating-product-vision
What's inside
- Skill name
facilitating-product-vision- Description
- Facilitates an owner-led product vision session and produces two artifacts: a strategy-only vision document plus roadmap items (outcome themes under Now/Next/Later, emitted as ROADMAP.md rows per the sibling item-row schema). Use when the user says 'define/refresh the product vision', 'our roadmap is too lean', 'turn the vision into slices', 'run a vision/strategy session', or 'help me shape the product direction'. Not for: ranking an existing backlog (triaging-requirements), planning one named item (designing-architecture), persisting a roadmap as issues (managing-github-issues), refining a single issue's ACs (refining-issue-acceptance), or read-only product analysis of a draft (council-product). The phrase 'product vision' is the trigger — this skill is about product/strategy, not visual UI critique; UI/screenshot 'vision' reviews belong to council-ux/validating-ui.
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 373 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (8)
- SKILL.md
- evals.json · evals/
- items.md · evals/fixtures/backlog/
- ROADMAP.md · evals/fixtures/lean-roadmap/
- owner-notes.md · evals/fixtures/lean-roadmap/
- README.md · evals/fixtures/single-item/
- artifact-format.md · references/
- consumer-session.md · references/
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Facilitating Product Vision Run a structured, owner-led session that turns product ambition into a strategy-only vision artifact plus roadmap items. The output is two artifacts (vision document + provisional `ROADMAP.md` rows) plus a working session record — never a rebuild of an existing roadmap and never a strategy invented under the owner's name. The session is owner-driven. Every judgment call is owner-owned and recorded with a one-line rationale; the facilitator does not invent strategy. The artifact is the contract: a separate reviewer reads it cold and must be able to defend the strategy and roadmap-item set. ## Contents - The session (process checklist) - Step 1 — Inputs & constraints (incl. Step 1a — decide the session mode) - Step 2 — Strategy batch + Checkpoint 1 - Step 3 — Roadmap batch + Checkpoint 2 - Step 4 — Compliance & phase gates + Checkpoint 3 - Step 5 — Write the artifacts - Step 6 — Council consults and handoffs - Boundary routing - References ## The session (process checklist) Copy this checklist and check off items as you complete them. Owner checkpoints are batched into three decision points — not one pause per piece — to keep the session conversational and avoid late-session rubber-stamping. ``` Vision Session Progress: - [ ] 1. Inputs & constraints (ambition, current assets, envelope, non-negotiables, vision-artifact home) - [ ] 1a. Decide mode (interactive multi-turn | declared one-shot | decisions pre-supplied inline) — the mode determines what fills Open Questions and what the final response must say - [ ] 2. Strategy batch draft (vision, segments+JTBD, alternatives+non-goals+anti-vision, value model, north star + guardrails) - [ ] 2a. CHECKPOINT 1 — strategy batch: present draft as questions-with-proposals; owner decides, every call recorded (skipped only when decisions are pre-supplied — recorded instead) - [ ] 3. Roadmap batch draft (3–6 outcome themes banded Now/Next/Later under the capacity envelope; each theme's work emitted as roadmap items in the sibling item-row schema — ACs NOT emitted, they are plan-time artifacts; risk-first ordering) - [ ] 3a. CHECKPOINT 2 — roadmap batch: same Q-with-proposal cadence (skipped only when decisions are pre-supplied — recorded instead) - [ ] 4. Compliance & phase gates draft (consent/privacy/regulatory milestones, phase gates that unlock later segments) - [ ] 4a. CHECKPOINT 3 — compliance + gates: confirm gates and owners (skipped only when decisions are pre-supplied — recorded instead) - [ ] 5. Write artifacts (vision doc at the owner-confirmed home using EXACT Title-Case headings; append outcome-theme + roadmap-item rows to ROADMAP.md per the sibling item-row schema; record the session as a working artifact) - [ ] 6. Optional council consults + handoffs (triaging-requirements ranks, designing-architecture plans the top roadmap item) ``` ## Step 1 — Inputs & constraints Capture what the strategy is constrained by. Read the consumer's existing decision-doc convention (an `AGENTS.md`, a `docs/`, an ADR index) for the project name, the team's pre-existing context, and the canonical home for a long-lived document. Ask the owner, and record in a one-line recap: - **Ambition** — what the product is for, in the owner's own words. - **Current assets** — what already exists (live code, design system, installed skills, an established `ROADMAP.md`, a prior vision doc). - **Budget / time envelope** — team capacity, regulatory deadlines, quarters the session is planning into. - **Non-negotiables** — pre-decided constraints the strategy must respect (legal posture, a platform commitment, a partner contract). Then ask the **canonical home for the vision artifact** and record the owner's answer. The vision artifact's path is a consumer decision, not a default. The skill cites the artifact's content contract (`references/artifact-format.md`, resolved against this skill's own directory — not the project's); the owner decides where it lives. If the owner names an established `ROADMAP.md`, read it. The session appends to it; it never rebuilds it from scratch (the established-once rule below). ### Step 1a — Decide the session mode Three modes, picked from the prompt before drafting starts. The mode determines what fills the artifact and what the final response is required to say. Pick one and stay in it for the whole session: - **Interactive multi-turn (default).** The session pauses at each of the three checkpoints and asks the owner. Owner decisions are recorded in-session as they are given. - **Declared one-shot (no back-and-forth).** The owner has said they cannot answer back (e.g., "this is a one-shot, I'll read the doc later"). The session still writes the artifact (it does not end with an intention to write it later). Sections that require owner input — Segments & Jobs-to-be-Done, Alternatives & Non-goals, Value & Business Model, North Star + Guardrails, Compliance & Phase Gates, the capacity envelope — get a placeholder of the form `Open question: <what is needed, which section it will land in>` rather than invented content. The final response addresses the owner and lists every open question in plain text — using the literal words "owner" and "question" — so the consumer can recover the artifact on a later pass. The session does not present an invented strategy as decided. - **Decisions pre-supplied inline.** The owner has already supplied every (or most) owner decisions for THIS run in this turn's prompt, or in the owner's own notes file the session has read. Each pre-supplied decision is recorded as a decision with its source cited. Anything the owner has NOT pre-supplied is surfaced as an Open Question. The session does not invent the missing inputs. The boundary between *interactive* and *pre-supplied* is whether the owner can answer back; the boundary between *one-shot* and *pre-supplied* is whether the owner has already given the decisions. A prompt that says "complete in one pass, here are the answers" is *pre-supplied*, not one-shot: the decisions exist; they are recorded. A prompt that says "I can't answer, write what you can" is one-shot: the decisions do not exist; they are surfaced. ## Step 2 — Strategy batch + Checkpoint 1 Draft the strategy batch. Read [references/artifact-format.md](references/artifact-format.md) (resolved against this skill's own directory) for the fixed section order and section schemas — the body cites it, never duplicates it. Cover:
From hierovision/ai-framework, MIT.
More from hierovision/ai-framework
- 0.592score
auditing-supply-chain
hierovision
Audit a software supply chain — dependency manifests and lockfiles, build provenance, SBOMs, and release artifacts — for what makes it untrustworthy…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.592score
optimizing-model-routing
hierovision
Re-derive the library's model bindings from objective evidence — gather the live opencode catalogs (or a local snapshot), identify and verify the most…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.592score
refining-issue-acceptance
hierovision
Refine a GitHub issue into a proper engineering spec — a short, clear description plus well-defined acceptance criteria (AC) written as observable, external…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.592score
reviewing-code
hierovision
Review a change (a diff, a branch, or an implement pass's output) against the plan that authorized it and against engineering quality, then issue a verdict…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.592score
debugging-test-failures
hierovision
Diagnose WHY a failing verification won't converge — reproduce first, hypothesis + discriminating experiment, classify the defect (code / test / plan /…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.592score
capturing-ui-evidence
hierovision
Captures the current visual state of UI targets into a structured, addressable EVIDENCE ARTIFACT — screenshots (full-page + element-clipped) plus a…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.592score
deploying-to-azure-swa
hierovision
Deploy a static front end to Azure Static Web Apps from GitHub Actions — preview-per-PR environments, production promotion on push to main, capturing the…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.592score
deploying-with-supabase
hierovision
Deploy to Supabase from CI — `supabase db push` forward-only semantics, "only one db push at a time" concurrency, migrations in CI via session-mode `--db-url`…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.592score
designing-architecture
hierovision
Turn ONE selected roadmap entry or direct feature request into a verifiable implementation plan that a separate build session can execute cold — then stop at…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.592score
designing-cicd
hierovision
Design GitHub Actions CI/CD topology — trigger selection (push / pull_request / workflow_run / workflow_dispatch), job sequencing via needs, concurrency…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.592score
handling-security-incidents
hierovision
Handle a security incident through the NIST SP 800-61 lifecycle — validate and scope the signal, build a timestamped fact timeline, classify severity, plan…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.592score
managing-github-issues
hierovision
Persist an established ROADMAP.md as GitHub issues — one issue per open roadmap row, enriched from its source files, tagged with a stable roadmap-id label for…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 7
- Last commit (this folder)
- Oct 12, 2026 (19 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/hierovision/ai-framework
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from hierovision
- 0.592score
auditing-supply-chain
hierovision
Audit a software supply chain — dependency manifests and lockfiles, build provenance, SBOMs, and release artifacts — for what makes it untrustworthy…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.592score
deploying-to-azure-swa
hierovision
Deploy a static front end to Azure Static Web Apps from GitHub Actions — preview-per-PR environments, production promotion on push to main, capturing the…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.592score
deploying-with-supabase
hierovision
Deploy to Supabase from CI — `supabase db push` forward-only semantics, "only one db push at a time" concurrency, migrations in CI via session-mode `--db-url`…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.592score
designing-architecture
hierovision
Turn ONE selected roadmap entry or direct feature request into a verifiable implementation plan that a separate build session can execute cold — then stop at…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.592score
designing-cicd
hierovision
Design GitHub Actions CI/CD topology — trigger selection (push / pull_request / workflow_run / workflow_dispatch), job sequencing via needs, concurrency…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.592score
handling-security-incidents
hierovision
Handle a security incident through the NIST SP 800-61 lifecycle — validate and scope the signal, build a timestamped fact timeline, classify severity, plan…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9
Done for you
Rather not set it up yourself?
Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.
See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies
Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.
- launches shipped
- 50+
- launches shipped
- media placements
- 500+
- media placements
- founders on every account
- 2
- founders on every account
Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block
Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.
Get facilitating-product-vision running in your business
Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.
Cite this page
facilitating-product-vision skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/hierovision-facilitating-product-vision (last updated 2026-10-24)