optimise-tests
Measure this repository's test suite, refactor it unit by unit with parallel scoped writers, and prove no unapproved coverage loss with a runtime and…
Skill by Gyunikuchan
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/gyunikuchan-optimise-tests
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: testing
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
- Runs as
- Node.js package
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/optimise-tests
What's inside
- Skill name
optimise-tests- Description
- Measure this repository's test suite, refactor it unit by unit with parallel scoped writers, and prove no unapproved coverage loss with a runtime and test-count delta.
- License
- MIT
- Metadata
- internal: true
- Instructions
- 93 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Before installing
- Ships executable scripts
Files (6)
- SKILL.md
- config.json
- criteria.md · references/
- compare.ts · scripts/
- inventory.ts · scripts/
- timing-reporter.ts · scripts/
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Optimise Tests You, the lead, make the `tests/` suite faster and higher-signal while preserving required behavior and baseline failures. Deterministic scripts measure; native writers refactor one unit each and provide positive retention and action evidence; you own the baseline, scheduling, checks, the move pass, the gate and the handoff. **Objective**: fewer reported leaf tests and lower suite wall time, with a green suite and durable tests that meet the [high-value bar](../../../skills/dispatch/references/templates/quality-bar.md#code). Coverage is informational implementation feedback. Report measured leaf-test and suite-duration deltas separately from ledger-derived scenario, case, and setup savings. Report unmet objectives explicitly. Paths are relative to the repo root. `<run>` is the current local time as `yyyy-mm-dd-hhmm`, fixed once at the start; `<work>` is `.scratch/optimise-tests/<run>`. `<skill>` is the directory holding this `SKILL.md`: | Host | `<skill>` | Unit writers | |---|---|---| | Antigravity | `.agents/skills/optimise-tests` | parallel subagents | | Claude Code | `.claude/skills/optimise-tests` | `Agent` tool (`general-purpose`), one call per packet | | Copilot | `.github/skills/optimise-tests` | sequential, in your own context | | OpenCode | `.opencode/skill/optimise-tests` | `task` tool, one call per packet | | Codex | `.agents/skills/optimise-tests` | native subagents, one per packet | [config.json](config.json) holds the units (test folders, in run order), `packetLineBudget`, `slowTestMs`, `maxParallelWriters`, `coverageInclude` and `excludeFromWriters`. A unit id is its folder path (for example `tests/unit/policy`) and is the value `--units` accepts. **Ownership**: each writer owns the files of one packet, inside one unit folder. Paths matching `excludeFromWriters` (shared helpers and fixtures) and every other folder are lead-owned; writers report needed changes there to the lead. Writers never run git write commands. ## 1. Baseline Check that `git status --porcelain` lists no changes under `tests/`, `skills/`, `scripts/` or `<skill>/scripts/`; a dirty tree makes the deltas unattributable, so ask the user to commit or stash first. Save `git status --porcelain` to `<work>/baseline-status.txt`; check 1 in step 3 preserves every path it lists. Then run the full suite once: ```bash node <skill>/scripts/inventory.ts --out <work>/before --coverage ``` It writes `<work>/before/inventory.json` (`totals`, `files`, `coverage`, `candidates`, `failures`), `<work>/before/events.jsonl`, and one packet per unit at `<work>/before/packets/<id>.json`. The id is the unit path with `/` replaced by `-` (`tests-unit-policy`); a unit over `packetLineBudget` splits into `<id>-1`, `<id>-2`, … by file-name prefix cluster. Recorded `failures` are a red baseline: note each one and leave those tests unchanged; report any proposed action on them as a blocker for lead review. **Done when:** `inventory.json` exists with nonzero `totals.tests`, a nonempty `coverage` map, and a packet for every configured unit. ## 2. Run unit writers Launch one native writer per packet, in parallel, at most `maxParallelWriters` at once; queue the rest and start the next as each returns. On a host without native subagents, process packets one at a time yourself. Brief each writer: ``` Optimise packet <id> of the dispatch-skills test suite. Read <skill>/references/criteria.md and follow it. Packet: <work>/before/packets/<id>.json. You own only the packet's files in <unit>. <new-files> Verify: the focused Node test command from AGENTS.md § Verification Details over the files you own. Ledger: append complete action and retained-scenario JSON records to <work>/ledger/<id>.jsonl. Classify every baseline test. The lead owns optional savings records after the full after snapshot. Never run git write commands. Return only completion (ledger path, verify result, any lead-owned request) or a blocker. ``` Set `<new-files>` to "You may add new test files in <unit>." when the unit has one packet. When a unit is split into several packets, set it to "Do not create files; propose required `move` or `split` actions with explicit before and intended after references for the lead." so parallel writers never pick the same new path. Pass the packet only; leave your own suspicions out so each writer judges its tests from the evidence. Writer questions about intent (a test may be the only evidence of a documented contract) go to the user; keep the other writers running meanwhile. **Done when:** every packet's writer has returned completion or a blocker, and every blocker is resolved or recorded for the handoff. ## 3. Check each unit As each writer returns, run checks 2 and 3a for its packet. Run check 3b for a unit once all of its writers have returned, and check 1 once every writer has returned, so no in-flight writer's edits are judged: 1. Compare `git status --porcelain` against the union of all packets' owned paths (packet files, plus new files in single-packet units). Ignore paths listed in `<work>/baseline-status.txt` and under `.scratch/`. Revert a remaining changed path under `tests/` that no packet owns, and record it as a rejected edit. Report any other remaining changed path to the user instead of reverting it, since a shared tree gives no per-writer attribution; never revert another packet's owned path. 2. Check its evidence against [criteria.md](references/criteria.md): every baseline test has an action or positive retain record; records are structurally complete; and duplicate or hollow deletion claims have the required evidence. Check same-defect claims against the named surviving tests. Resolve after references against the full after inventory in step 5. Return incomplete or unsupported evidence to the writer. An uncertain required contract stays unchanged and remains a blocker outside the gate ledger. 3. Run the focused command from `AGENTS.md` § Verification Details: a. Over the returning packet's owned files. If red, send the failing output back to that writer once; if still red, restore only that packet's failing files and record the gap. b. Over the whole unit, after all its writers return. If red, attribute each failing file to its owning packet and handle it as in 3a. **Done when:** every unit's 3b run is green, and every rejected or restored change is recorded. ## 4. Move pass After all units pass step 3, apply ledger `move` actions and any `split` that needs a new file serially as lead-owned work. Move or split tests to match their after references, update imports, and remove superseded source tests. Writers propose moves and leave files in place; they may split tests within files they own. Apply helper and fixture requests as lead-owned work. Run the focused command over every file touched, then confirm each after reference against the final inventory. **Done when:** every `move`, new-file `split`, and lead-owned request is applied or declined with a recorded reason, its evidence matches the resulting tests, and the touched files are green. ## 5. Gate Run the full suite again; a partial `--units` run cannot serve as the after snapshot, because files it skips read as zero covered lines: ```bash node <skill>/scripts/inventory.ts --out <work>/after --coverage node <skill>/scripts/compare.ts <work>/before/inventory.json <work>/after/inventory.json --ledger <work>/ledger > <work>/compare.md npm test ``` The comparison validates complete action and retention evidence and reports after-run failures. Review retained scenarios against the high-value bar and check same-defect claims against the named survivors. Coverage changes, including zero or missing metrics, are informational and require no disposition, digest binding or approval. Missing classifications, malformed records, unknown kinds and invalid evidence fail the gate even when coverage holds. The report measures reported leaf-test counts and suite wall-clock duration. Add at most one optional `savings` record for ledger-derived scenarios, cases, cosmetic table merges, or reduced repeated setup calls, with concrete evidence. `compare.md` labels these separately from measured totals; unreported quantities remain unmeasured. A table merge that retains all cases is cosmetic, not removed work. Preserve configured concurrency and timing budgets. **Done when:** `compare.ts` exits 0 and `npm test` passes, both after the last change. ## 6. Hand off Reply in the handoff format of `AGENTS.md` § Long-Running Work and Handoff. Report measured leaf-test and suite-duration deltas against the baseline; if an objective was not met, say so. Keep these results separate from ledger-derived scenario, case, cosmetic-merge, and setup claims. Include `<work>/compare.md`, ledger paths, counts of deleted, merged, moved, and restored tests, informational coverage changes, plus every rejected edit and unresolved blocker. **Done when:** the reply is sent.
From Gyunikuchan/dispatch-skills, MIT.
More from Gyunikuchan/dispatch-skills
- 0.567score
audit-dispatch-skills
Gyunikuchan
Report-only static audit of Dispatch through scenario walkthroughs of each verb, shared handoff review, and bounded provider probes.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
audit-dispatch-skills-fix
Gyunikuchan
Triage and explain audit defects and opportunities, then deliver coherent batches through Dispatch planning and review with direct implementation.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.565score
publish-git
Gyunikuchan
Prepare and publish a GitHub release when the user requests release publication, including version selection, changelog, integration, and recovery.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.564score
dispatch
Gyunikuchan
Multi-agent planning, review, implementation.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.558score
dispatch-code-review
Gyunikuchan
Alias for `/dispatch review` of code.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.558score
dispatch-implement
Gyunikuchan
Alias for `/dispatch implement`.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.558score
dispatch-plan
Gyunikuchan
Alias for `/dispatch plan`.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.539score
grilling
Gyunikuchan
Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Oct 18, 2026 (10 days ago)
- Last release
- Oct 21, 2026 (7 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/Gyunikuchan/dispatch-skills
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from Gyunikuchan
- 0.567score
audit-dispatch-skills
Gyunikuchan
Report-only static audit of Dispatch through scenario walkthroughs of each verb, shared handoff review, and bounded provider probes.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
audit-dispatch-skills-fix
Gyunikuchan
Triage and explain audit defects and opportunities, then deliver coherent batches through Dispatch planning and review with direct implementation.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.565score
publish-git
Gyunikuchan
Prepare and publish a GitHub release when the user requests release publication, including version selection, changelog, integration, and recovery.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.564score
dispatch
Gyunikuchan
Multi-agent planning, review, implementation.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.558score
dispatch-code-review
Gyunikuchan
Alias for `/dispatch review` of code.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.558score
dispatch-implement
Gyunikuchan
Alias for `/dispatch implement`.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9
Cite this page
optimise-tests skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/gyunikuchan-optimise-tests (last updated 2026-10-24)