subagent-driven-development
Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session
Skill by gutsofpratik
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/gutsofpratik-subagent-driven-development
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: agent-building
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/subagent-driven-development
What's inside
- Skill name
subagent-driven-development- Description
- Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 565 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Before installing
- Instructions read files in your home folder (~/.ssh, ~/.aws…)
Agent Skills spec issues
- name: "subagent-driven-development" does not match folder "local-9026f1a3bf3b4e231e1c16b5"
- body: 565 lines (spec recommends under 500)
Files (8)
- SKILL.md
- UPSTREAM-LICENSE.txt
- implementer-prompt.md
- re-review-prompt.md
- review-package · scripts/
- sdd-workspace · scripts/
- task-brief · scripts/
- task-reviewer-prompt.md
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Subagent-Driven Development
Execute plan by dispatching a fresh implementer subagent per task, a task review (spec compliance + code quality) after each, and a broad whole-branch review at the end.
**Why subagents:** You delegate tasks to specialized agents with isolated context. By precisely crafting their instructions and context, you ensure they stay focused and succeed at their task. They should never inherit your session's context or history — you construct exactly what they need. This also preserves your own context for coordination work.
**Core principle:** Fresh subagent per task + task review (spec + quality) + broad final review = high quality, fast iteration
**Narration:** between tool calls, narrate at most one short line — the
ledger and the tool results carry the record.
**Continuous execution:** Do not pause to check in with your human partner between tasks. Execute all tasks from the plan without stopping. The only reasons to stop are the four named below, or all tasks complete. "Should I continue?" prompts and progress summaries waste their time — they asked you to execute the plan, so execute it.
**Rulings, not stalls.** A running plan does not wait on a human. Conflicts,
ambiguities, plan defects, a cap you would have asked to exceed — decide
them. The spec is the binding authority, the plan is its argument, and your
judgment settles what neither answers. Record every decision in the ledger as
`Ruling: <what you decided> — <why> — <what it costs if wrong>`, and keep
going. A wrong ruling costs rework your human partner can see and undo; a
session parked on a question costs their whole day and buys nothing.
Four things stop you, and only these: an irreversible or destructive
operation; a security-sensitive action; a side effect outside this worktree
that norms say you ask about first (a merge, a push to a shared branch, a
publish); and a plan so broken that every path forward is a guess. For those,
stop and ask.
## When to Use
```dot
digraph when_to_use {
"Have implementation plan?" [shape=diamond];
"Tasks mostly independent?" [shape=diamond];
"Partner chose inline, or no subagent tool?" [shape=diamond];
"subagent-driven-development" [shape=box];
"executing-plans" [shape=box];
"Manual execution or brainstorm first" [shape=box];
"Have implementation plan?" -> "Tasks mostly independent?" [label="yes"];
"Have implementation plan?" -> "Manual execution or brainstorm first" [label="no"];
"Tasks mostly independent?" -> "Partner chose inline, or no subagent tool?" [label="yes"];
"Tasks mostly independent?" -> "Manual execution or brainstorm first" [label="no - tightly coupled"];
"Partner chose inline, or no subagent tool?" -> "executing-plans" [label="yes"];
"Partner chose inline, or no subagent tool?" -> "subagent-driven-development" [label="no"];
}
```
**vs. Executing Plans (inline):**
- Fresh subagent per task (no context pollution) instead of one context doing every task
- Review after each task (spec compliance + code quality) instead of only at the end
- Costs a fresh context per task and per review; inline costs one context plus one final reviewer
- Both run in this session, share the same plan workspace and ledger, and never pause between tasks
## The Process
```dot
digraph process {
rankdir=TB;
subgraph cluster_per_task {
label="Per Task";
"Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)" [shape=box];
"Implementer asks questions?" [shape=diamond];
"Answer questions, provide context" [shape=box];
"Implementer implements, tests, commits, self-reviews" [shape=box];
"Generate review package, dispatch task reviewer (./task-reviewer-prompt.md)" [shape=box];
"Spec ✅ and quality approved?" [shape=diamond];
"Finding conflicts with plan text?" [shape=diamond];
"Rule on the conflict, ledger the ruling" [shape=box];
"Fix round R of 5: R≤3 resume implementer; R≥4 fresh implementer, more capable model" [shape=box];
"Dispatch scoped re-review (./re-review-prompt.md)" [shape=box];
"All findings addressed?" [shape=diamond];
"R = 5?" [shape=diamond];
"Adjudicate each open finding" [shape=box];
"Any load-bearing finding?" [shape=diamond];
"Rule and continue; stop only if every path forward is a guess" [shape=box];
"Park findings in ledger with rulings" [shape=box];
"Append completion to ledger, mark todo complete" [shape=box];
}
"Setup: worktree, ledger check, read plan, pre-flight review" [shape=box];
"More tasks remain?" [shape=diamond];
"Dispatch final code reviewer (../requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md)" [shape=box];
"Final findings? ONE fix dispatch, one scoped re-review, adjudicate residuals" [shape=box];
"Final review clean: delete this plan's workspace" [shape=box];
"Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch" [shape=box style=filled fillcolor=lightgreen];
"Setup: worktree, ledger check, read plan, pre-flight review" -> "Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)";
"Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)" -> "Implementer asks questions?";
"Implementer asks questions?" -> "Answer questions, provide context" [label="yes"];
"Answer questions, provide context" -> "Implementer implements, tests, commits, self-reviews";
"Implementer asks questions?" -> "Implementer implements, tests, commits, self-reviews" [label="no"];
"Implementer implements, tests, commits, self-reviews" -> "Generate review package, dispatch task reviewer (./task-reviewer-prompt.md)";
"Generate review package, dispatch task reviewer (./task-reviewer-prompt.md)" -> "Spec ✅ and quality approved?";
"Spec ✅ and quality approved?" -> "Append completion to ledger, mark todo complete" [label="yes"];
"Spec ✅ and quality approved?" -> "Finding conflicts with plan text?" [label="no"];
"Finding conflicts with plan text?" -> "Rule on the conflict, ledger the ruling" [label="yes"];
"Rule on the conflict, ledger the ruling" -> "Fix round R of 5: R≤3 resume implementer; R≥4 fresh implementer, more capable model";
"Finding conflicts with plan text?" -> "Fix round R of 5: R≤3 resume implementer; R≥4 fresh implementer, more capable model" [label="no"];
"Fix round R of 5: R≤3 resume implementer; R≥4 fresh implementer, more capable model" -> "Dispatch scoped re-review (./re-review-prompt.md)";
"Dispatch scoped re-review (./re-review-prompt.md)" -> "All findings addressed?";
"All findings addressed?" -> "Append completion to ledger, mark todo complete" [label="yes"];
"All findings addressed?" -> "R = 5?" [label="no"];
"R = 5?" -> "Fix round R of 5: R≤3 resume implementer; R≥4 fresh implementer, more capable model" [label="no - next round"];
"R = 5?" -> "Adjudicate each open finding" [label="yes - breaker trips"];
"Adjudicate each open finding" -> "Any load-bearing finding?";
"Any load-bearing finding?" -> "Rule and continue; stop only if every path forward is a guess" [label="yes"];
"Any load-bearing finding?" -> "Park findings in ledger with rulings" [label="no"];
"Park findings in ledger with rulings" -> "Append completion to ledger, mark todo complete";
"Append completion to ledger, mark todo complete" -> "More tasks remain?";
"More tasks remain?" -> "Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)" [label="yes"];
"More tasks remain?" -> "Dispatch final code reviewer (../requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md)" [label="no"];
"Dispatch final code reviewer (../requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md)" -> "Final findings? ONE fix dispatch, one scoped re-review, adjudicate residuals";
"Final findings? ONE fix dispatch, one scoped re-review, adjudicate residuals" -> "Final review clean: delete this plan's workspace";
"Final review clean: delete this plan's workspace" -> "Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch";
}
```
## SetupFrom gutsofpratik/Horizon-Skills, MIT.
More from gutsofpratik/Horizon-Skills
- 0.594score
playground
gutsofpratik
Creates interactive HTML playgrounds — self-contained single-file explorers that let users configure something visually through controls, see a live preview…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 2Claude Code +9 - 0.585score
source-command-revise-claude-md
gutsofpratik
Update CLAUDE.md with learnings from this session
SkillAFreshness: A★ 2Claude Code +9 - 0.574score
mcp-builder
gutsofpratik
Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 2Claude Code +9 - 0.574score
skill-creator
gutsofpratik
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 2Claude Code +9 - 0.571score
webapp-testing
gutsofpratik
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 2Claude Code +9 - 0.569score
algorithmic-art
gutsofpratik
Creating algorithmic art using p5.js with seeded randomness and interactive parameter exploration.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 2Claude Code +9 - 0.569score
canvas-design
gutsofpratik
Create beautiful visual art in .png and .pdf documents using design philosophy.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 2Claude Code +9 - 0.568score
requesting-code-review
gutsofpratik
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
SkillAFreshness: A★ 2Claude Code +9 - 0.568score
writing-plans
gutsofpratik
Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code
SkillAFreshness: A★ 2Claude Code +9 - 0.566score
theme-factory
gutsofpratik
Toolkit for styling artifacts with a theme.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 2Claude Code +9 - 0.566score
frontend-design
gutsofpratik
Guidance for distinctive, intentional visual design when building new UI or reshaping an existing one.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 2Claude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 2
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Oct 16, 2026 (11 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/gutsofpratik/Horizon-Skills
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from gutsofpratik
- 0.594score
playground
gutsofpratik
Creates interactive HTML playgrounds — self-contained single-file explorers that let users configure something visually through controls, see a live preview…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 2Claude Code +9 - 0.585score
source-command-revise-claude-md
gutsofpratik
Update CLAUDE.md with learnings from this session
SkillAFreshness: A★ 2Claude Code +9 - 0.574score
mcp-builder
gutsofpratik
Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 2Claude Code +9 - 0.574score
skill-creator
gutsofpratik
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 2Claude Code +9 - 0.571score
webapp-testing
gutsofpratik
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 2Claude Code +9 - 0.569score
algorithmic-art
gutsofpratik
Creating algorithmic art using p5.js with seeded randomness and interactive parameter exploration.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 2Claude Code +9
Cite this page
subagent-driven-development skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/gutsofpratik-subagent-driven-development (last updated 2026-10-24)