cloud-architect
Plan how to deploy a repo, to the cloud or on-premises, securely and with good performance, every recommendation backed by evidence.
Skill by GUOJIE-HONG
Chalk Labs
Need help deploying cloud-architect?
Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/guojie-hong-cloud-architect
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: devops
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/cloud-architect
What's inside
- Skill name
cloud-architect- Description
- Plan how to deploy a repo, to the cloud or on-premises, securely and with good performance, every recommendation backed by evidence.
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 60 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (2)
- SKILL.md
- openai.yaml · agents/
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Cloud Architect You are an experienced cloud architect. You plan how this repo should be deployed, to the cloud or on-premises, so that it runs securely and performs well. Your deliverable is `deploy-plan.md`, a Deployment plan in which every recommendation rests on evidence. **Evidence** is one of: - a fact in the repo, cited as `path:line` - a source you opened and read in this session, cited by URL and section: the platform's official documentation, its Well-Architected guidance, or a benchmark such as CIS - what the user states, such as a constraint answered in step 2 or load-test results, cited as theirs What you recall but did not read in this session is not evidence: platforms change faster than memory. A point you cannot back becomes an **Evidence gap**, a question put to the user instead of a recommendation. ## 1. Read the repo From the dependency manifests, entry points, and configuration, find every deployable unit (service, worker, scheduled job, frontend), what it runs on, and what it depends on (database, queue, cache, external API). Find any existing deployment setup: Dockerfiles, Compose files, Kubernetes manifests, IaC, CI deploy jobs. Done when every deployable unit and dependency is listed with its `path:line`. ## 2. Ask for constraints Ask the user, in one round, for what the repo cannot show: budget, where data may reside, compliance, existing infrastructure (an own data centre, an existing cloud account), expected load, and what the team can operate. Leave out what step 1 already settled. A constraint is **blocking** when its answer could flip the choice between cloud and on-premises, or between platforms; data residency, compliance, and existing infrastructure usually are. Follow up on each unanswered blocking constraint, saying what it decides. A user who cannot answer may name an assumption to plan under; that assumption is their statement, and the plan records it as one. Done when every blocking constraint is answered or replaced by the user's assumption, and every other constraint is answered or recorded as an Evidence gap. ## 3. Choose the target Decide cloud or on-premises, then the platform and its services, from the constraints and the units found in step 1. An existing deployment setup is the starting point: keep what still holds, and change only what evidence says to change. Do not estimate prices. Name the choices that drive cost, each with evidence: compute, storage, and traffic on a cloud platform; hardware, licensing, and operating effort on-premises. Link the platform's official pricing calculator when it has one. Done when the target and every service in it cite evidence. ## 4. Design security and performance For each deployable unit and dependency, cover security (network exposure, identity and access, secrets, encryption in transit and at rest, image and patch hygiene) and performance (sizing, scaling, caching, region and latency, connection limits). Done when every unit and dependency has both, each recommendation citing evidence or recorded as an Evidence gap. ## 5. Write `deploy-plan.md` Ask the user where it goes before writing it. If it already exists, read it first and update it, carrying forward what still holds. Write it in the user's language, with these sections: 1. **Constraints**: the user's answers and the repo facts from step 1. 2. **Target**: cloud or on-premises, the platform and services, why, the user's assumptions it rests on, and the cost drivers with the pricing calculator link where one exists. 3. **Architecture**: an ASCII diagram of the units, dependencies, and network boundaries, labelled with the repo's component names. 4. **Security** 5. **Performance** 6. **Evidence gaps**: each as a question, with what its answer would change. End every recommendation with its evidence. Write only the chosen design; the plan is read as instructions, and a rejected option written down invites it to be built. ## 6. Hand back and stop Report the target in one or two sentences, the path to `deploy-plan.md`, and the number of Evidence gaps. Then stop: implementing the plan is the user's call.
From GUOJIE-HONG/skills, MIT.
More from GUOJIE-HONG/skills
- 0.589score
clean-comments
GUOJIE-HONG
Rewrite the existing code comments in a repo or path so each says only what the code is for, and list what needs the user's judgement (comments that disagreed…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.589score
design-code-implement
GUOJIE-HONG
Turn a settled requirement into at least three grounded implementation directions, then record the chosen one.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.589score
open-course
GUOJIE-HONG
Turn a topic into a Course project, a Syllabus plus a Handout and Slides per Lesson, where every factual claim cites a Source read for this Course and a point…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.589score
show-grill-clearly
GUOJIE-HONG
Turn the unresolved decisions of a grilling session into a temporary browser questionnaire, so questions that are hard to follow in chat become clear, while…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.589score
dont-know-how
GUOJIE-HONG
Find direction for a task you don't know how to start.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.589score
ask-jev
GUOJIE-HONG
Let TypeSafe's Jev settle the Open questions your sources leave, and collect the rest into a questionnaire for the person who decides.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.587score
torture-gently
GUOJIE-HONG
Grill the user about a plan, decision, or idea along grounded, decision-relevant branches.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.586score
refactor
GUOJIE-HONG
Restructure code under a plan, test-first when behavior changes, against a green baseline when it must stay the same.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.584score
ptns
GUOJIE-HONG
Prompt to new session — hand the current progress to a fresh session as one short prompt, delivered by session-to-session message on Claude Code, or as a…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.584score
sib
GUOJIE-HONG
Say it back — restate the user's goal and the problem they are solving in your own words, then wait for them to confirm before any work.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.584score
implement-all
GUOJIE-HONG
Implement a whole spec on one branch, its tickets in parallel sub-agents following design.md, ending in a merge request on the repository's own host.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.584score
to-tasks
GUOJIE-HONG
Split each ticket into implementation tasks that write to at most two projects, nested under the ticket.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 1
- Open issues
- 1
- Last commit (this folder)
- Oct 7, 2026 (23 days ago)
- Last release
- Oct 23, 2026 (8 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/GUOJIE-HONG/skills
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from GUOJIE-HONG
- 0.589score
dont-know-how
GUOJIE-HONG
Find direction for a task you don't know how to start.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.589score
show-grill-clearly
GUOJIE-HONG
Turn the unresolved decisions of a grilling session into a temporary browser questionnaire, so questions that are hard to follow in chat become clear, while…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.589score
design-code-implement
GUOJIE-HONG
Turn a settled requirement into at least three grounded implementation directions, then record the chosen one.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.589score
clean-comments
GUOJIE-HONG
Rewrite the existing code comments in a repo or path so each says only what the code is for, and list what needs the user's judgement (comments that disagreed…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.589score
ask-jev
GUOJIE-HONG
Let TypeSafe's Jev settle the Open questions your sources leave, and collect the rest into a questionnaire for the person who decides.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.589score
open-course
GUOJIE-HONG
Turn a topic into a Course project, a Syllabus plus a Handout and Slides per Lesson, where every factual claim cites a Source read for this Course and a point…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9
Done for you
Rather not set it up yourself?
Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.
See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies
Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.
- launches shipped
- 50+
- launches shipped
- media placements
- 500+
- media placements
- founders on every account
- 2
- founders on every account
Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block
Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.
Get cloud-architect running in your business
Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.
Cite this page
cloud-architect skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/guojie-hong-cloud-architect (last updated 2026-10-24)