Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool

data-quality

Data validation and quality contracts for pipelines — uniqueness/PK, not-null, range/domain, referential integrity, freshness/SLA, row-count tie-out…

Skill by gesmith0606

IndexedMIT
Write a review

Install

Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

npx agentmarket install skill/gesmith0606-data-quality

Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

Data validation and quality contracts for pipelines — uniqueness/PK, not-null, range/domain, referential integrity, freshness/SLA, row-count tie-out, distribution drift — with the fail-closed-at-the-gate pattern. Use when adding tests/expectations to a pipeline, defining a data contract, catching nulls/dupes/stale/drifted data before a serving table or report, or picking between dbt tests, Great Expectations, Pandera, and Soda.

Use cases: documents, data

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

Permissions

What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.

Tools
No tools found
Secrets
None asked for
Install scripts
None found

Network hosts it talks to 1

  • codeload.github.com · found in install command

Files it touches

  • ~/.claude/skills/data-quality

What's inside

Skill name
data-quality
Description
Data validation and quality contracts for pipelines — uniqueness/PK, not-null, range/domain, referential integrity, freshness/SLA, row-count tie-out, distribution drift — with the fail-closed-at-the-gate pattern. Use when adding tests/expectations to a pipeline, defining a data contract, catching nulls/dupes/stale/drifted data before a serving table or report, or picking between dbt tests, Great Expectations, Pandera, and Soda.
License
MIT
Instructions
95 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub

Files (2)

  • SKILL.md
  • tool-map.md · references/

SKILL.md (first lines)

# Data Quality

Validate the *data flowing through a pipeline* against explicit contracts, and **fail closed at
the gate** — block bad data from landing in a serving table or report rather than letting it ship
and apologizing later. This skill owns the assertions and the gate; it does not own:

- **Code-level swallowed errors** (empty `except`, ignored return codes, `catch {}`) → that's the
  **silent-failure-hunter** agent. Here the *code runs fine* but the *data is wrong*.
- **ML feature/label/training contracts** (schema skew, label leakage, train/serve drift) →
  **mle-workflow**. Drift here means *pipeline data* drifted, not model inputs.

Cross-link siblings: **dbt** and **sql-warehouse** for where most of these run in-warehouse, and
**cheap-data-orchestration** for scheduling the gate and alerting on failure.

## The principle: fail closed at the gate

A quality check that *logs a warning and continues* is theater — bad data still reaches users.
The contract is only real if a failure **stops the pipeline**:

1. Land new data in a **staging/quarantine** table, not the serving table.
2. Run assertions against staging.
3. **Pass → promote** (swap/merge into serving). **Fail → halt**: leave serving on its last-good
   state, alert, and quarantine the bad batch for inspection.
4. Never partially publish. A half-loaded serving table is worse than a stale one.

Stale-but-correct beats fresh-but-wrong for anything a person trusts (a dashboard, a payment, a
report). Make the gate **blocking by default**; downgrade a specific check to warn-only only with
a documented reason.

## The assertion catalog

The seven checks that catch most real incidents. Pick the ones the data's contract actually needs.

| Assertion | Catches | Typical expression |
|-----------|---------|--------------------|
| **Uniqueness / PK** | Duplicate rows, fan-out from a bad join, double-loaded batch | `count(*) = count(distinct key)`; no null in key |
| **Not-null / completeness** | Dropped fields, upstream schema change, partial extract | required columns have 0 nulls (or null rate < threshold) |
| **Accepted range / domain** | Garbage values, unit errors, bad enums | numeric within `[min,max]`; categorical in allowed set; regex/format |
| **Referential integrity** | Orphan rows, broken FK, late-arriving dimension | every FK value exists in parent; no orphans |
| **Freshness / SLA** | Stuck pipeline, dead upstream feed | `max(updated_at) > now() - interval`; partition for today exists |
| **Row-count tie-out vs source** | Silent partial load, truncated extract, dedup gone wrong | `target_rows` within tolerance of `source_rows` (exact or ±%) |
| **Distribution drift** | Upstream semantics changed without erroring | row count, null rate, mean/quantiles, category mix vs trailing baseline |

Notes that save incidents:

- **Tie-out is the cheapest high-value check.** A job can succeed, tables can be non-null and
  unique, and still be missing half the rows. Always reconcile a count against the source of truth.
- **Distribution drift is the subtle one** — nothing is malformed, but the *meaning* shifted (a
  currency switched, an enum was renamed upstream, a sensor recalibrated). Compare against a
  trailing window, alert on Δ beyond a band. This is *pipeline* drift; for *model* drift see
  mle-workflow.
- **Freshness needs a clock you trust** — assert on event/load time, not wall-clock, or a
  backfill will look "stale" and a stuck clock will look "fresh."
- **Set thresholds from history, not vibes.** A null rate of 2% may be normal; pick bands from the
  trailing baseline and tighten over time.

## Where to assert (defense in depth)

- **At ingestion** — schema/type/format and not-null, before raw data even lands. Reject early.
- **At transform** — uniqueness, referential integrity, range/domain on the modeled tables (this
  is dbt-test territory; see the **dbt** and **sql-warehouse** skills).
- **At the publish gate** — tie-out, freshness, drift, plus a final re-check of the critical
  invariants right before promotion. This is the blocking gate above.

Run the heavy/whole-table checks in-warehouse where the data already lives (echoing
**data-throughput-accelerator**: move the check to the data, don't pull the data to the check).

## Workflow

1. **Write the contract first** — for each table: keys, required columns, value domains, FK
   relationships, freshness SLA, expected row volume. A contract nobody wrote is a contract nobody
   keeps.
2. **Encode it as assertions** in the right tool (see `references/tool-map.md`).
3. **Wire the gate** so failures *block promotion*, not just log.
4. **Alert with context** — which check, which table, observed vs expected, sample failing rows.
   Route through **cheap-data-orchestration**.
5. **Quarantine** the failing batch so it's inspectable and replayable.
6. **Tune thresholds** from observed history; review flaky checks instead of muting them.

## Guardrails

- A check that only warns is **not** a gate — bad data still ships. Make it block or document why.
- Don't delete/auto-coerce failing rows to make a check pass — quarantine and inspect.
- Don't assert on wall-clock for freshness when the data has its own event time.
- Don't tie-out against a number derived from the same broken extract — reconcile to an
  independent source of truth.
- A green test suite on an **empty/half-loaded** table is a false pass — pair every quality check
  with a row-count/volume check.
- For regulated, financial, healthcare, or customer-impacting data, keep the quarantined batch and
  the gate decision as replay/audit evidence.

**Tool selection** — dbt tests vs Great Expectations vs Pandera vs Soda, with a pick-by-situation
table — lives in **`references/tool-map.md`**. Read it when you're choosing how to implement.

From gesmith0606/claude-config-public, MIT.

More from gesmith0606/claude-config-public

Signals

Stars
0
Forks
0
Open issues
0
Last commit (this folder)
Aug 9, 2026 (2 months ago)

From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

Details

License
MIT
First seen
Oct 24, 2026
Last checked
Oct 24, 2026

More from gesmith0606

Cite this page

data-quality skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/gesmith0606-data-quality (last updated 2026-10-24)