long-task-continuation
Use when a task is multi-step, may span context resets or sessions, uses subagents, or risks losing state before completion.
Skill by GanyuanRan
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/ganyuanran-long-task-continuation
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: productivity, agent-memory, agent-orchestration
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/long-task-continuation
What's inside
- Skill name
long-task-continuation- Description
- Use when a task is multi-step, may span context resets or sessions, uses subagents, or risks losing state before completion.
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 189 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (2)
- SKILL.md
- durable-work-guidance.md
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Long Task Continuation ## Overview Keep long work checkpointed, resumable, drift-aware, and evidence-gated. This protocol does not execute plans, dispatch subagents, run tests, or grant completion authority. ## Authority Boundary The Method Pack owns continuation discipline only. It does not own the parent plan, host retry/watchdog behavior, authoritative `GateDecision`, evidence sufficiency, requirement acceptance, or completion. ## When To Use Use this skill when the work has meaningful phases, may be compacted/resumed or handed off, uses subagents, or explicitly needs continuity and drift control. Architecture, contract, shared-workflow, and verification-gate changes also benefit from it. Do not force it onto a short answer or one-command check. Choose exactly one state carrier: - within this continuation workflow, use a durable `work/` record for medium/high work, or for work of any complexity that actually crosses sessions, needs handoff, or requires resumable state; - otherwise keep one inline checkpoint. Multi-step, todo-driven, possible-compaction, and subagent use do not force durable records for low-complexity work by themselves. Do not create both carriers or a record per slice. ## Required Artifacts A durable task has one process trail under `docs/aegis/work/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>/`. It keeps logical intent/baseline state, the latest todo/checkpoint/resume state, terminal evidence/drift state, and a completion reflection when warranted. These are `TaskIntentDraft`, `BaselineReadSetHint`, `BaselineUsageDraft`, `ImpactStatementDraft`, `TodoCheckpointDraft`, `ResumeStateHint`, `DriftCheckDraft`, and `EvidenceBundleDraft` views—not authoritative runtime records or separate plan owners. Read only the lifecycle-matched section of `durable-work-guidance.md`: - `## Required Artifact Layout` and `## Create A Durable Work Record` for a new durable work record; - `## Update A Slice` when an existing helper-backed record needs sidecar updates; - `## Retry Convergence Detail` for retry/attempt bookkeeping; - `## Pause, Handoff, And Completion Bundle` when preparing a pause, handoff, or completion bundle; and - `## Expanded State Fields` only when natural checkpoint prose is ambiguous. The reference owns artifact layout and `<aegis-workspace-helper>` command detail; this file owns carrier selection, resume order, drift decisions, and stop conditions. An `Execution Readiness View` may be kept in the intent or active checkpoint for medium/high, handoff-prone, long-running, subagent-driven, architecture, contract, compatibility, or retirement-sensitive work. It renders existing intent, scope, baseline, owner, test, review, and drift constraints; it is not a new JSON artifact or completion authority. Planless Slice Lane: - When an existing parent plan/spec owns a bounded task, reuse it and the current checkpoint. For a no-parent direct bounded request with no new durable or unclear verification boundary, use an inline checkpoint. - State one compact `Slice Card`: Goal, `Parent plan/spec` (or `none — direct bounded request`), Files, Boundary, Verification, and Stop. - The slice goal closes only that slice. Final completion returns to the parent or direct bounded request through `verification-before-completion`. - Do not create a plan/spec merely to give a micro-slice a parent, and do not create per-slice plans/specs or work records. - Escalate when a new owner, contract, schema, public API, architecture, migration, persistence, security/permission, distribution/release surface, unclear verification boundary, or mismatch with parent scope or acceptance appears. When durable architecture decisions are in scope, these work records are the preferred ADR Auto Backfill source. Preserve decision signals, source refs, alternatives, compatibility, retirement, drift, and baseline-sync questions. ## Start Protocol Before execution: 1. Capture requested outcome, scope, non-goals, risks, parent plan/goal, success evidence, and stop states (`done | blocked | needs-verification | scope-exceeded`). 2. Identify required baseline refs and record acknowledged, cited, and missing refs. Missing authority pauses in `needs-baseline-readback`. 3. Choose inline or durable state once, then record the todo map, active slice, completed slices/evidence, blockers, next step, and current branch/HEAD. 4. When an `Execution Readiness View` exists, retain its intent lock, scope fence, baseline lock, compatibility/retirement boundary, tests, reviews, evidence, and rewind rules. 5. For a new helper-backed record, use `durable-work-guidance.md` to create and structurally check it before implementation. ## Retry Convergence Protocol A failed verification is another attempt in the current slice, not a new slice. Keep failed-attempt telemetry out of terminal evidence and normal commits. Only `evidence-finalized`, `blocked`, or `abandoned` is terminal. When retry state reaches `process-artifact-pressure`, stop auto-retry and route to `systematic-debugging` or `verification-before-completion`. Load the durable reference only when the attempt/evidence commands or sidecar rules are needed. ## Per-Slice Protocol Before each slice, state the current goal/todo, intended edits, explicit non-edits, verification, and readiness alignment. A bounded parent-plan or no-parent slice uses the compact Slice Card rather than a new plan/spec. After each slice, update completed todos, evidence refs, newly used baseline refs, blockers, next step, and drift decision. When an active helper-backed work record exists, read `durable-work-guidance.md` and update that same record; never create another workstream for bookkeeping. When patch-shape/ripple triage, an H-class finding, or a bounded compatibility mitigation fired, a locally green result does not clear the direction. Retain
From GanyuanRan/Aegis, MIT.
More from GanyuanRan/Aegis
- 0.831score
ui-ux-governance
GanyuanRan
Use when designing, changing, or reviewing user-facing interfaces or interaction flows, including API changes that alter visible states or recovery.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1.4KClaude Code +9 - 0.826score
using-aegis
GanyuanRan
Use when starting a turn or checking Aegis skill routing.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1.4KClaude Code +9 - 0.825score
subagent-driven-development
GanyuanRan
Use when executing a written implementation plan with independent tasks in the current session where delegation beats inline coordination cost; otherwise…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1.4KClaude Code +9 - 0.825score
update-aegis
GanyuanRan
Use when the user says `aegis:update`, asks to update or upgrade an installed Aegis method-pack, wants the latest Aegis version, or asks whether Aegis is…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1.4KClaude Code +9 - 0.825score
requesting-code-review
GanyuanRan
Use when requesting independent code review, after implementation slices, before merging high-risk work, or when verification exposes evidence, baseline…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1.4KClaude Code +9 - 0.825score
receiving-code-review
GanyuanRan
Use when receiving code review feedback before implementing suggestions, especially when feedback is unclear, risky, disputed, or technically questionable.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1.4KClaude Code +9 - 0.825score
goal-framing
GanyuanRan
Use when the user explicitly sets an Aegis goal with /aegis-goal, Aegis goal:, or asks to define goal, success evidence, stop condition, or task boundaries…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1.4KClaude Code +9 - 0.825score
first-principles-review
GanyuanRan
Use when asked for first-principles or Occam's-razor review, or when high-risk decisions involve competing constraints, fallback growth, duplicate owners, or…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1.4KClaude Code +9 - 0.825score
finishing-a-development-branch
GanyuanRan
Use when verified work needs integration or cleanup of an existing task-created branch/worktree, or the user explicitly requests merge, PR, or branch…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1.4KClaude Code +9 - 0.825score
executing-plans
GanyuanRan
Use when executing a written implementation plan across sessions or with review checkpoints.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1.4KClaude Code +9 - 0.825score
brainstorming
GanyuanRan
Use when defining ambiguous or high-complexity new features, product behavior, UI/component design, architecture choices, contract changes, or when…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1.4KClaude Code +9 - 0.825score
anti-entropy-governance
GanyuanRan
Use when touching retiring old logic, collapsing duplicate owners, removing fallbacks, or schema/persistence/source-of-truth boundaries; identify…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1.4KClaude Code +9
Compare and alternatives
Featured in
Signals
- Stars
- 1,383
- Forks
- 78
- Open issues
- 1
- Last commit (this folder)
- Oct 11, 2026 (16 days ago)
- Last release
- Oct 21, 2026 (6 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/GanyuanRan/Aegis
- Website
- autoloom.codes/aegis/
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
Same skill elsewhere
Copies of this SKILL.md published by others; search shows only one of them.
More from GanyuanRan
- 0.831score
ui-ux-governance
GanyuanRan
Use when designing, changing, or reviewing user-facing interfaces or interaction flows, including API changes that alter visible states or recovery.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1.4KClaude Code +9 - 0.826score
using-aegis
GanyuanRan
Use when starting a turn or checking Aegis skill routing.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1.4KClaude Code +9 - 0.825score
subagent-driven-development
GanyuanRan
Use when executing a written implementation plan with independent tasks in the current session where delegation beats inline coordination cost; otherwise…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1.4KClaude Code +9 - 0.825score
writing-plans
GanyuanRan
Use when you have an approved spec or written requirements for a multi-step task that needs a durable plan document before touching code.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1.4KClaude Code +9 - 0.825score
using-git-worktrees
GanyuanRan
Use when a coding task needs a concurrent checkout, unrelated dirty state blocks safe branch switching, or the user or repository explicitly requires a…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1.4KClaude Code +9 - 0.825score
update-aegis
GanyuanRan
Use when the user says `aegis:update`, asks to update or upgrade an installed Aegis method-pack, wants the latest Aegis version, or asks whether Aegis is…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1.4KClaude Code +9
Cite this page
long-task-continuation skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/ganyuanran-long-task-continuation (last updated 2026-10-24)