llm-council
Use when a pr-council-review (PR or branch mode) result needs independent corroboration from a different model family before trusting a GREEN verdict —…
Skill by ffroliva
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/ffroliva-llm-council
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: ml, security, agent-building, code-review
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/llm-council
What's inside
- Skill name
llm-council- Description
- Use when a pr-council-review (PR or branch mode) result needs independent corroboration from a different model family before trusting a GREEN verdict — high-stakes, security-sensitive, or architecturally significant reviews where same-model-family Claude subagents might share a blind spot. Also use when the user asks for "external", "second opinion", "cross-model", or names codex/antigravity (`agy`) or another external CLI coding agent alongside a review.
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 68 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (1)
- SKILL.md
SKILL.md (first lines)
# `llm-council` — external-tools review layer ## Overview Wraps `pr-council-review` (unchanged) and adds a layer of external CLI coding agents (`codex`, plus Antigravity — the `agy` harness) as additional independent reviewers, then folds their verdicts into the same synthesis. Internal Claude subagents are independent per-dimension but share one model family's blind spots — a phrasing choice, a Windows-vs-POSIX nuance, or a syntax error that reads fine to one Claude reviewer reads fine to all of them. A different model family catches a different error distribution. Confirmed live: on one review, external tools caught 6 real, distinct issues (a wording-accuracy bug, a wrong test count, a Windows-only test-triviality nuance, a test-isolation gap, a missing test, a malformed markdown fence) that 12 internal Claude-subagent dispatches (6 dimensions × 2 rounds) had all missed. ## When to Use - Any `pr-council-review` run (PR# mode or branch mode) where the artifact is high-stakes enough to want a second, differently-biased opinion before calling it GREEN. - Not needed for a quick spot-check or draft iteration — use `/review` (single-agent) for that; `pr-council-review` alone for a normal-stakes PR. ## Quick Reference — Tiers | Tier | Internal (pr-council-review) | External tools | |---|---|---| | `small` (default) | ✅ full dimension council | none — identical to running `pr-council-review` directly | | `medium` | ✅ | `codex` | | `high` | ✅ | `codex` + Antigravity (`agy`) | Tier controls **tool breadth**, not review rounds. Fix → re-verify → repeat until GREEN (or a round cap) happens at every tier — that's how council review works, not a tier knob. ## Tool Registry Fixed, tested invocation recipes. Do not improvise a command for a listed tool — the "obvious" invocation is often a trap (see `codex` below). ### `codex` - **NEVER** `codex review`. Its built-in prompt has gotten stuck in a self-inflicted loop reading skill files via a malformed PowerShell command, then retrying the identical broken command for 20+ minutes with zero progress. Confirmed reproducible on a clean retry. - **Use:** `codex exec -s read-only -C <absolute-repo-dir> --skip-git-repo-check "<direct, fully self-contained prompt>"`. - **Probe:** `codex --version` (near-instant; confirms binary health only, not auth/quota). - **Timeout budget:** real calls run 10-20 min at default (`xhigh`) reasoning effort. Always background it — never block synchronously. - **Orphan risk:** a killed/timed-out `codex exec` can leave `codex.exe` / `codex-code-mode-host.exe` / sandbox-helper processes running on Windows. After any kill, verify via `tasklist`/`ps` that the named PIDs are actually gone before retrying — a retry racing an orphan still writing the same output path silently corrupts the result. ### Antigravity (`agy`) - **What it is:** Google's Antigravity harness, invoked via `agy`. It supplies the `high`-tier's second, different-model-family opinion. - **Working recipe (verified 2026-08-27):** `agy --model <model> --mode plan --dangerously-skip-permissions --add-dir <absolute-repo-dir> --print-timeout 15m -p "<prompt>"`. `--mode plan` is what makes the permission flag acceptable: the agent gets reads, not writes. Verify the worktree is unmodified afterwards (`git status`) — on the run that produced this note, it was. - **Do NOT use `--agent <gsd-*> --new-project`.** That was the previous recipe and it terminates with a bare `Error: Agent execution terminated due to error.` — this was misdiagnosed here as quota exhaustion for months. - **Probe:** `agy models` — **not** `agy --version`. The version check only proves the binary exists; `agy models` exercises auth and returns the model list (Gemini 3.x Pro/Flash, Claude, GPT-OSS), which is what you actually need to know. - **The failure mode is permissions, not quota.** Headless mode cannot prompt, so tool requests are auto-denied and the run returns *no output at all*: `a tool required the "command" permission that headless mode cannot prompt for, so it was auto-denied`. Three separate runs failed three different ways before this surfaced; each error named the next problem, so read the actual message rather than assuming quota. - **If it's genuinely unavailable:** don't silently retry past its probe. **Suggest installing it, or substitute another external CLI coding agent**, and continue best-effort with whatever did return; never block the whole round on it. Note that the `gemini` CLI is *not* a valid substitute for individual accounts — it now returns `IneligibleTierError: This client is no longer supported for Gemini Code Assist for individuals`, and it fails that way **after** passing a `--version` probe. ## Dispatch Flow 1. Resolve tier → tool list. 2. **Probe every resolved tool in parallel, short timeout (~10-15s).** A tool that doesn't respond is excluded from this round — name it in the report, don't just drop it silently. The probe only catches binary-health failures (not installed, hung shell); a quota-exhausted tool can still pass the probe and fail on the real call — that's what the dispatch-layer disclosure step below is for. 3. Dispatch `pr-council-review` (unchanged) for the internal dimension council. 4. In parallel, dispatch each surviving external tool via its registry recipe, backgrounded. 5. Fold each returning verdict into the same synthesis table `pr-council-review` produces — same GREEN/YELLOW/RED vocabulary, tagged by source (e.g. `D3 (internal)` vs `codex (external)`). A tool that fails or times out after passing its probe is dropped from **this round** with an explicit note in the report. Never silently drop, never block the whole round on one flaky tool. 6. Any finding — internal or external — that warrants a fix gets applied, then re-verified against the specific dimension/tool that flagged it (not necessarily the whole pool again). 7. Report: `pr-council-review`'s existing shape, plus an "External tools" line noting which ran / were skipped / failed and why. ## Common Mistakes | Mistake | Fix | |---|---| | Running `codex review` because it sounds like the obvious subcommand for a review task | Use `codex exec -s read-only -C <dir> --skip-git-repo-check "<prompt>"` — see registry | | Dispatching the real (slow) external call before probing | Probe first, short timeout — a dead tool costs 10-20 min discovered late vs. ~15s discovered early | | Treating one failed external tool as a reason to abandon the whole external layer | Best-effort: drop that tool for this round, disclose it, keep going with whatever did return | | Blocking synchronously on an external tool call | Always background it — internal dimensions and other external tools shouldn't wait | | Retrying a timed-out tool without checking for orphaned processes first | `tasklist`/`ps` check + explicit kill before any retry against the same output path | | Silently downgrading to codex-only when `agy` is unavailable | Disclose the drop and **suggest installing Antigravity or substituting another external CLI agent** — don't hide the reduced coverage | ## Cross-References **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** the internal council dispatch is `pr-council-review` (`skills/pr-council-review/SKILL.md`) — this skill does not reimplement dimension detection, synthesis rules, or report shape, it wraps them.
From ffroliva/gflow-cli, MIT.
More from ffroliva/gflow-cli
- 0.799score
scenario
ffroliva
Pre-implementation edge-case and scenario explorer for gflow-cli.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 332Claude Code +9 - 0.799score
issue-assessment
ffroliva
Use when triaging a GitHub issue for gflow-cli — a reporter's bug claim, a freshly-filed issue, or deciding whether and how to act on one.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 332Claude Code +9 - 0.799score
issue-resolve
ffroliva
Use when an assessed gflow-cli issue (verdict CONFIRMED-BUG or LIKELY-BUG) has localized, verifiable scope and should be driven to a fix.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 332Claude Code +9 - 0.799score
live-verify
ffroliva
Two-part gate for gflow-cli feature/fix work.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 332Claude Code +9 - 0.799score
plan
ffroliva
Creates a structured task-by-task implementation plan for a gflow-cli feature.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 332Claude Code +9 - 0.799score
predict
ffroliva
Pre-implementation multi-persona adversarial analysis for gflow-cli proposals.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 332Claude Code +9 - 0.795score
sonar
ffroliva
Check the SonarCloud quality gate for a PR (or the current branch) and drive it to zero.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 332Claude Code +9 - 0.792score
check
ffroliva
Auto-fix lint and formatting, then report types and tests.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 332Claude Code +9 - 0.791score
status
ffroliva
Surfaces the current state of work in gflow-cli.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 332Claude Code +9 - 0.791score
spike
ffroliva
Gather EVIDENCE from the live Flow surface — DOM, network, HAR — before claiming a feature is broken, missing, or impossible.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 332Claude Code +9 - 0.787score
release
ffroliva
Cut a new gflow-cli release — bump version, update CHANGELOG, tag, push, and back-merge.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 332Claude Code +9 - 0.786score
known-issues
ffroliva
Surface open known issues.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 332Claude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 332
- Forks
- 95
- Open issues
- 30
- Contributors
- 22
- Last commit (this folder)
- Aug 28, 2026 (2 months ago)
- Last release
- Oct 24, 2026 (4 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/ffroliva/gflow-cli
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from ffroliva
- 0.799score
plan
ffroliva
Creates a structured task-by-task implementation plan for a gflow-cli feature.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 332Claude Code +9 - 0.799score
predict
ffroliva
Pre-implementation multi-persona adversarial analysis for gflow-cli proposals.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 332Claude Code +9 - 0.799score
issue-assessment
ffroliva
Use when triaging a GitHub issue for gflow-cli — a reporter's bug claim, a freshly-filed issue, or deciding whether and how to act on one.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 332Claude Code +9 - 0.799score
issue-resolve
ffroliva
Use when an assessed gflow-cli issue (verdict CONFIRMED-BUG or LIKELY-BUG) has localized, verifiable scope and should be driven to a fix.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 332Claude Code +9 - 0.799score
live-verify
ffroliva
Two-part gate for gflow-cli feature/fix work.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 332Claude Code +9 - 0.799score
scenario
ffroliva
Pre-implementation edge-case and scenario explorer for gflow-cli.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 332Claude Code +9
Cite this page
llm-council skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/ffroliva-llm-council (last updated 2026-10-24)