blitz
Lightweight Codex executor for multiple ad-hoc tasks or lanes—fast, parallel, and adversarial—without the full issue or resolve-issue pipeline.
Skill by fbserg
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/fbserg-blitz-63d716
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: data, marketing, agent-building
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/blitz
What's inside
- Skill name
blitz- Description
- Lightweight Codex executor for multiple ad-hoc tasks or lanes—fast, parallel, and adversarial—without the full issue or resolve-issue pipeline. Use when the user invokes /blitz or $blitz, asks to run several unfiled tasks quickly, or explicitly wants a fast adversarial fan-out. Not a planner; use epic-plan for broad planning, issue for filed GitHub work, and ww for one approval-gated lane.
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 35 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (2)
- SKILL.md
- openai.yaml · agents/
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Blitz Act as the orchestrator; do not implement lane work in the main checkout. - Fan out immediately. Run independent lanes concurrently with Codex sub-agents, one isolated worktree per disjoint file set. Serialize only genuine overlap. - Cap concurrency at ~12 active descendants per root. More lanes than that run as sequential waves, not one wide fan-out. - Give each lane a lane-scoped task card — file scope, acceptance gate, only the rulings that bind that lane — never the full root prompt. Never let two agents edit the same checkout. - When a lane corresponds to a filed issue, claim it for the authenticated GitHub user as the lane starts. Stop rather than stealing an issue assigned to someone else. Keep queued issues unassigned until their lane actually starts. - Adversarially review plans, diffs, and conclusions before accepting them. Use distinct, role-locked lenses that try to refute claims against repository evidence. - With three or more background lanes, keep a visible ledger and actively monitor every lane. A silent lane is not evidence of progress. - Every lane must end with exactly one of `DONE` / `BLOCKED` / `HANDED_OFF` plus a one-line reason. A bare trailing message with no terminal status is a defect — chase it down before closing the ledger. - **Findings return batched, never as issue confetti.** One batched finding list per review lane; at most one follow-up issue per surface (measured: 42 follow-up issues filed in one day from a single wave). - Move through gates without re-confirming phases. Take each lane through checks, commit, push, and PR or integration as the repository policy requires. - Stop only for scope changes, destructive ambiguity, an unresolvable failed gate, or overlapping ownership that cannot be isolated. ## Keep fast lanes fast - Give each lane a gate ladder before it starts: cheap targeted checks, one batched preflight, then one expensive full gate. Do not use the full gate as a discovery loop. - After any gate failure, collect the complete failure set and fix it as one batch. Re-run the narrowest checks that prove the batch before returning to the full gate. - Never run the same expensive gate more than twice without a new diagnosis or changed hypothesis. After the second failure, stop the loop, inspect the orchestration and test topology, and report the concrete blocker. - Treat golden drift, formatting, static analysis, resource parity, and literal audits as preflight checks. Clear all of them before the final full suite. - Batch all known review and adversarial findings before the first push and before any hosted-CI rerun. Do not use hosted CI as a fix-by-fix feedback loop. - Do not push cosmetic-only cleanup that restarts expensive hosted CI unless correctness or required reviewer understanding materially requires an immediate push; fold all other clarity cleanup into the next substantive batch. - Do not accept retry-only greens for flakes. Stress the focused failure and repair lifecycle, dispatcher, shared-state, or test isolation defects; if it does not reproduce, record the stress evidence once and continue. - Reserve shared resources explicitly (build mutexes, emulators, backend records). Release them immediately between commands; stale reservations are blockers, not queues to poll forever. - Send a user-visible update at least every 60 seconds while work is active. Report the current command or gate, the last observed result, and the next terminal condition. Repeated `wait` calls are not progress. - If a lane is silent for two update intervals, request a ledger update. If it remains silent or repeats the same gate, interrupt and re-scope it instead of continuing to poll. - After targeted, preflight, and full local gates pass and adversarial review clears a lane, dependent lanes may start on explicitly tracked stacked branches while the prerequisite's hosted CI runs. Record each stack's base and dependency order. - Merge stacks only in dependency order, and only after every final branch head receives its required hosted checks. Restack or rebase after prerequisites merge, then rerun invalidated checks without discarding the recorded proof from the pre-restack head. Use `issue` for filed GitHub issues and its batch routing. Use `ww` for exactly one plan-first, approval-gated task. Use `epic-plan` when the work first needs decomposition.
From fbserg/skill-issue, MIT.
More from fbserg/skill-issue
- 0.561score
blitz
fbserg
Run a batch of lanes, filed issues or ad-hoc, in parallel worktrees with adversarial review.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.561score
deep-research
fbserg
Deep multi-source, fact-checked research report via the Workflow harness.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.561score
epic-plan
fbserg
Scope a multi-deliverable or multi-session topic into a GitHub tracker issue plus child issues.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.561score
resolve-issue
fbserg
One GitHub issue → review-ready PR via one worker in a worktree.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.561score
simplify-sweep
fbserg
Batch-clean a range of pushed commits: headless Sonnet /simplify per area, review the edits, commit.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.559score
herdr-share
fbserg
Share the current Herdr pane through a temporary browser link.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.556score
patchcue-resolve-issue
fbserg
PatchCue worker workflow for Claude Code: resolve one GitHub issue solo in the worktree PatchCue provides, posting its marked plan and outcome comments.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.524score
issue
fbserg
Front door for GitHub issue work in Codex.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.524score
resolve-issue
fbserg
Resolve one GitHub issue in Codex to a review-ready PR: one solo pass end to end in an isolated worktree — test-first, real checks, draft then ready.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.524score
usage-review
fbserg
Review a body of AI-assistant transcripts (your own local Claude Code / Codex CLI sessions, or a shared exporter-markdown archive) into a red-teamed report…
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.521score
adversary
fbserg
Cross-model adversarial review: dispatch Codex to attack a plan or diff before you commit to it.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.521score
zero
fbserg
Zero out a repo — destructive cleanup of pending work, PRs, local and remote branches, worktrees, and main push.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 2
- Last commit (this folder)
- Jul 31, 2026 (3 months ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/fbserg/skill-issue
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from fbserg
- 0.561score
blitz
fbserg
Run a batch of lanes, filed issues or ad-hoc, in parallel worktrees with adversarial review.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.561score
simplify-sweep
fbserg
Batch-clean a range of pushed commits: headless Sonnet /simplify per area, review the edits, commit.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.561score
resolve-issue
fbserg
One GitHub issue → review-ready PR via one worker in a worktree.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.561score
deep-research
fbserg
Deep multi-source, fact-checked research report via the Workflow harness.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.561score
epic-plan
fbserg
Scope a multi-deliverable or multi-session topic into a GitHub tracker issue plus child issues.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.559score
herdr-share
fbserg
Share the current Herdr pane through a temporary browser link.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9
Cite this page
blitz skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/fbserg-blitz-63d716 (last updated 2026-10-24)