Pattern Analysis
Audit codebase patterns and conventions, evaluate proposed changes for consistency
Skill by dtsong
Chalk Labs
Need help deploying Pattern Analysis?
Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/dtsong-pattern-analysis
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: security
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions: not checked yet.
What's inside
- Skill name
Pattern Analysis- Description
- Audit codebase patterns and conventions, evaluate proposed changes for consistency
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 133 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Agent Skills spec issues
- name: only lowercase letters, digits and single hyphens allowed
- name: "Pattern Analysis" does not match folder "pattern-analysis"
Files (1)
- SKILL.md
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Pattern Analysis ## Purpose Audit the codebase for existing patterns and conventions, then evaluate proposed changes for consistency. ## Inputs - Codebase or directory to audit - Proposed changes or new code to evaluate (if applicable) - Specific concerns or areas of focus (if any) - Known tech stack and framework conventions ## Process ### Step 1: Scan Structural Patterns - **File naming conventions:** - kebab-case, PascalCase, camelCase, snake_case - Suffix conventions (.utils.ts, .types.ts, .test.ts, .stories.tsx) - **Directory organization:** - Feature-based (feature/components, feature/hooks, feature/utils) - Layer-based (components/, hooks/, utils/, types/) - Hybrid approaches - **Module export patterns:** - Barrel files (index.ts re-exports) - Direct imports - Default vs named exports ### Step 2: Identify Code Patterns - **Component patterns:** - Server vs client components (React Server Components) - Composition patterns (render props, compound components, HOCs) - Prop drilling vs context vs stores - **Data fetching patterns:** - Custom hooks (useQuery, useSWR, custom fetch hooks) - Server actions - API routes - Direct fetch in server components - **State management patterns:** - Local state (useState, useReducer) - Context (React Context, providers) - External stores (Zustand, Jotai, Redux) - URL state (search params, pathname) - **Error handling patterns:** - try/catch blocks - Result/Either types - Error boundaries - Toast notifications - **Type patterns:** - interfaces vs type aliases - Generic patterns and utility types - Zod schemas vs manual types - Shared type files vs co-located types ### Step 3: Catalog Existing Conventions Document discovered conventions: | Category | Convention | Example File | Frequency | |----------|-----------|--------------|-----------| | File naming | ... | ... | ... | | Component style | ... | ... | ... | | Data fetching | ... | ... | ... | | State management | ... | ... | ... | | Error handling | ... | ... | ... | | Type definitions | ... | ... | ... | | Import ordering | ... | ... | ... | | Comment style | ... | ... | ... | | Testing patterns | ... | ... | ... | ### Step 4: Evaluate Proposed Changes For each proposed change, check: - **Does it follow existing naming conventions?** (files, variables, functions, components) - **Does it follow existing structural patterns?** (directory placement, export style) - **Does it reuse existing utilities/helpers?** (don't reinvent what exists) - **Does it introduce a new pattern?** If so: - Is the new pattern justified? (existing pattern inadequate, new requirement) - Is it better enough to warrant migration? Or just different? - Will it cause confusion having two patterns for the same thing? - **Does it create inconsistency with similar existing code?** (same feature, neighboring files) ### Step 5: Produce Recommendations - **Follow these patterns** (with file references as examples): - Pattern A: See `src/components/ExampleComponent.tsx` - Pattern B: See `src/hooks/useExampleHook.ts` - **Avoid these patterns** (with rationale): - Anti-pattern X: Because [reason] - Deprecated pattern Y: Replaced by [alternative] - **Consider refactoring** (if new patterns are genuinely better): - Migrate pattern A to pattern B across [scope] - Estimated scope: [number of files affected] ## Output Format ### Pattern Inventory | Category | Pattern | Example File | Frequency | Status | |----------|---------|--------------|-----------|--------| | File naming | kebab-case components | `src/components/team-card.tsx` | High | Standard | | Data fetching | useQuery hooks | `src/hooks/use-teams.ts` | High | Standard | | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ### Consistency Report | Proposed Change | Existing Pattern | Match? | Recommendation | |----------------|-----------------|--------|----------------| | ... | ... | Yes/No | ... | ### Recommendations 1. **Follow:** [pattern] — see [file reference] 2. **Avoid:** [anti-pattern] — because [rationale] 3. **Refactor:** [migration suggestion] — [scope and effort] ## Quality Checks
From dtsong/claude-code-wsl-setup, MIT.
Signals
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Feb 13, 2026 (8 months ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/dtsong/claude-code-wsl-setup
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
Same skill elsewhere
Copies of this SKILL.md published by others; search shows only one of them.
More from dtsong
- 0.445score
cicd-generation
dtsong
Use when creating GitHub Actions workflows, adding CI/CD to a project, or reviewing pipeline security.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 2Claude Code +9 - 0.440score
protocol-analysis
dtsong
Use when analyzing cryptographic protocol security by modeling state machines, enumerating transitions, and identifying desynchronization, replay, downgrade…
SkillDFreshness: D★ 2Claude Code +9 - 0.440score
pqc-readiness
dtsong
Use when assessing a system's readiness for post-quantum cryptography migration, inventorying classical crypto usage, mapping NIST-standardized PQC…
SkillDFreshness: D★ 2Claude Code +9 - 0.440score
crypto-review
dtsong
Use when reviewing cryptographic implementations for algorithm choice correctness, key management soundness, side-channel resistance, and crypto agility…
SkillDFreshness: D★ 2Claude Code +9 - 0.439score
code-search
dtsong
Fast codebase searches using grep/glob.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 2Claude Code +9 - 0.434score
dockerfile-generation
dtsong
Build minimal, secure Dockerfiles with verification-first workflow.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 2Claude Code +9
Done for you
Rather not set it up yourself?
Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.
See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies
Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.
- launches shipped
- 50+
- launches shipped
- media placements
- 500+
- media placements
- founders on every account
- 2
- founders on every account
Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block
Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.
Get Pattern Analysis running in your business
Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.
Cite this page
Pattern Analysis skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/dtsong-pattern-analysis (last updated 2026-10-24)