Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool
This entry duplicates final-report, which is the one we list in search.

final-report

Final engagement report generation — executive summary, technical report, findings aggregation, attack path narrative, detection gap matrix, remediation…

Skill by DebasishTripathy13

IndexedApache-2.0★ 1
Write a review

Chalk Labs

Need help deploying final-report?

Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.

Book a call

Install

Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

npx agentmarket install skill/debasishtripathy13-final-report

Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

Final engagement report generation — executive summary, technical report, findings aggregation, attack path narrative, detection gap matrix, remediation roadmap.

Use cases: documents

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

Permissions: not checked yet.

What's inside

Skill name
final-report
Description
Final engagement report generation — executive summary, technical report, findings aggregation, attack path narrative, detection gap matrix, remediation roadmap.
License
Apache-2.0
Allowed tools
Read, Write
Metadata
tags: report, final, executive-summary, technical-report, remediation, detection-gap · subdomain: orchestration · when_to_use: final report, generate report, engagement complete, all objectives done, executive summary, technical report
Instructions
488 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub

Files (1)

  • SKILL.md

SKILL.md (first lines)

# Final Engagement Report Generation

**Execute when all OPPLAN objectives are in `passed` or `blocked` status. Output is two Markdown documents in `report/`.**

## Report Generation Workflow

```
1. Read all findings/*.md              (parse YAML frontmatter for metadata)
2. Read all findings/attack-paths/PATH-*.md
3. Read timeline.jsonl                 (activity log)
4. Read plan/roe.json + plan/conops.json + plan/deconfliction.json  (engagement context)
5. Read plan/opplan.json               (objective status summary)
6. Generate report/executive-summary.md
7. Generate report/technical-report.md
8. Do not create a legacy findings.md summary; summaries belong in report/
```

### Step 1: Initialize Output Directory

```
bash(command="mkdir -p /workspace/report")
```

### Step 2: Aggregate Findings

Read every `findings/*.md` (named `{severity}-{slug}.md`) and extract frontmatter fields:

```
for each FIND-xxx.md:
  - id, title, severity, cvss, target, phase, technique (ATT&CK ID), status, confidence
```

Sorting rules:
- Primary: severity (`critical` → `high` → `medium` → `low` → `informational`)
- Secondary: CVSS score descending
- De-duplicate findings that appear across multiple objectives (keep highest-severity instance)
- Flag `confidence: unverified` findings — they require a disclaimer note in the report

### Step 3: Generate Executive Summary

Write to `report/executive-summary.md` using the template below. Use plain business language throughout — zero technical jargon.

---

```markdown
# Executive Summary
## [Engagement Name] — Penetration Test Results

**Prepared for**: [Client Name]
**Engagement Period**: [Start Date] – [End Date]
**Conducted by**: Pandora Autonomous Red Team
**Classification**: CONFIDENTIAL

---

## Engagement Overview

[2–3 sentences: what was tested, why, what methodology was used.
Example: "Between [dates], [client] engaged the red team to assess the
security posture of [scope]. The assessment simulated a [threat actor
archetype from conops.json] targeting [primary objective from roe.json].
Testing followed the Penetration Testing Execution Standard (PTES) and
MITRE ATT&CK framework."]

---

## Key Metrics

| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Total Findings | [N] |
| Critical | [N] |
| High | [N] |
| Medium | [N] |
| Low / Informational | [N] |
| Objectives Completed | [N] / [total] |
| Objectives Blocked | [N] / [total] |
| Attack Success Rate | [%] |
| Detection Rate | [%] (findings detected by existing controls) |

---

## Top 3 Critical Findings

### 1. [FIND-ID]: [Title]
[1 paragraph, business impact focus. No CVE numbers, no tool names.
Example: "Attackers with internet access can gain full administrative
control of the company's customer database without any valid credentials.
This would allow theft of all customer records, potential regulatory
fines under GDPR, and complete loss of customer trust."]

### 2. [FIND-ID]: [Title]
[1 paragraph, business impact focus]

### 3. [FIND-ID]: [Title]
[1 paragraph, business impact focus]

*[If fewer than 3 critical findings, use highest-severity findings available.]*

---

## Overall Risk Rating

**[CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW]**

[2–3 sentences justifying the rating in business terms. Consider: ease of
exploitation, potential business impact, data sensitivity, regulatory exposure.
Example: "The overall risk is rated CRITICAL because an unauthenticated
attacker on the internet achieved domain administrator access within [X]
minutes, with no detection by existing security controls. This represents
a complete failure of the network perimeter and would result in total
compromise of all company systems."]

---

## Strategic Recommendations

1. **[Recommendation 1 — address most critical finding]** — [1 sentence, business language, e.g. "Immediately restrict internet access to the database server and require multi-factor authentication for all administrative accounts."]
2. **[Recommendation 2]** — [1 sentence]

From DebasishTripathy13/Pandora, Apache-2.0.

Signals

Stars
1
Forks
0
Open issues
0
Last commit (this folder)
Jun 6, 2026 (5 months ago)

From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

Details

License
Apache-2.0
First seen
Oct 24, 2026
Last checked
Oct 24, 2026

Same skill elsewhere

Copies of this SKILL.md published by others; search shows only one of them.

More from DebasishTripathy13

Done for you

Rather not set it up yourself?

Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.

See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies

Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.

launches shipped
50+
launches shipped
media placements
500+
media placements
founders on every account
2
founders on every account

Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block

Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.

Get final-report running in your business

Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.

Goes to the Chalk Labs founders, not the newsletter. Privacy

Need help deploying final-report?

CallGet help
Cite this page

final-report skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/debasishtripathy13-final-report (last updated 2026-10-24)