reflect

Files (6)

• LICENSE
• SKILL.md
• divergent-reviewer.md · references/
• judgment-reviewer.md · references/
• synthesizer.md · references/
• tooling-reviewer.md · references/

SKILL.md (first lines)

Read [the native runtime contract](../dav-mode/references/playbook-runtime.md) before executing. It maps the Cursor tools, model examples, configuration paths and cloud placements below to actual native capabilities. Those examples do not authorize unsupported calls, delegation, model campaigns, publication or desktop access. Keep the full method and report an unavailable required capability as a gap.

## Runtime adaptation

Read the [shared working rules](../dav-mode/references/working-rules.md) and
[playbook runtime](../dav-mode/references/playbook-runtime.md).
Keep reviewer and synthesizer evidence lookups read-only and within this session's
scope. Use jj for history and `jj diff --git` for patches. Do not query unrelated
chats, credentials, or active user sessions.

Delegation requires explicit permission. Use the native child API, configured
reviewer roles, and actual start-and-wait lifecycle. Inherit configured defaults
when no role is configured. Do not assume Cursor Task fields, per-call model
selection, or that a read-only flag controls MCP access in this runtime.
Without delegation permission, apply all three templates serially yourself,
then synthesize. Label this as direct review, not independent or cross-model proof.

The `create-skill` routing labels below map to the installed
[skill-creator](../skill-creator/SKILL.md), the user-approved complete public
Anthropic authoring workflow. It is not Cursor's unpublished built-in. Follow
its draft/test/iterate and description-optimization loops through the native
adapter. No ad hoc edit replaces those loops. Creating a verification skill
remains a separate specialized workflow. Missing model, budget, human-review,
or independent-role capabilities keep the affected execution gate open.

# Reflect

Mine the current conversation for durable learnings, then route them into skill edits.

Invoke when the user says "reflect" or "/reflect". Skip when the conversation is trivial, off-topic, or already covered by an existing skill the parent followed correctly. One-offs are not learnings.

## 1. Locate the active transcript

Before fanning out, find this conversation's transcript in the `agent-transcripts/` directory the system prompt names. Do not glob across `~/.cursor/projects/*/`. That crosses workspace boundaries and reads private chats from unrelated projects.

```bash
ls -t <agent-transcripts>/*.jsonl <agent-transcripts>/*/*.jsonl <agent-transcripts>/*/subagents/*.jsonl 2>/dev/null | head -10
```

That covers the legacy flat (`<id>.jsonl`), current nested (`<id>/<id>.jsonl`), and subagent (`<parent>/subagents/<child>.jsonl`) layouts. For each candidate, read the first JSONL line. Take the file whose `message.content[0].text` contains the conversation's opening user prompt. If none matches, pass a tight digest of the session instead.

## 2. Spawn three reviewers in parallel

One message, three `Task` calls, `subagent_type: generalPurpose`, agent mode (`readonly: false`). Reviewers need MCP access to look up the tickets, chat threads, and observability traces the transcript references, and readonly strips MCPs.

Each reviewer and the synthesizer name a role line in the `pstack-models.mdc` rule and a default. Set `model` to that line's value, or to the default if the rule or the line is missing. Leave `model` unset when the value is `auto` or `inherit-parent`. If the Task tool rejects a slug, use the default and say so. If it rejects the default, use the closest valid slug of the same family from its error message. Pick each subagent's reasoning level and fast or standard speed for the job, per the Subagents section of the **dav-mode** skill.

| Lens | Role line | Default `model` | Prompt template |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Judgment | `reflect judgment, divergent, synthesizer` | `claude-opus-5-5-xhigh` | `references/judgment-reviewer.md` |
| Tooling | `reflect tooling` | `grok-4.7-xhigh-fast` | `references/tooling-reviewer.md` |
| Divergent | `reflect judgment, divergent, synthesizer` | `claude-opus-5-5-xhigh` | `references/divergent-reviewer.md` |

Pass each template verbatim, substituting the transcript path or digest where marked. Reviewers return findings in the `Task` response body.

## 3. Synthesize

One `Task` call, `subagent_type: generalPurpose`, `model` from the `reflect judgment, divergent, synthesizer` line (default `claude-opus-5-5-xhigh`), agent mode (`readonly: false`). It spot-verifies citations through MCP, and readonly strips MCPs. Pass `references/synthesizer.md` verbatim, with each reviewer's full output inlined where marked. It returns an Accepted / Rejected / Backlog list.

## 4. Structural enforcement check

Move any Accepted item that a lint rule, script, metadata flag, or runtime check would enforce more reliably to Backlog. See the **encode-lessons-in-structure** principle skill.

## 5. Apply

Present the synthesizer's full Accepted / Rejected / Backlog output and wait for explicit approval before applying any Accepted edit. The user picks the subset and may redirect routings. Skill changes affect every future agent in the org. Do not auto-apply.

File each Backlog item to your team's devex or backlog tracker without waiting. Only the Accepted list waits for approval.

Follow each approved row's Routing exactly:

- Trivial existing-skill edit (a one-line bullet, a tightened sentence, a stale fact corrected): the parent does it directly.
- Substantive existing-skill edit (a new section, a new pattern table, more than ~10 lines): hand to Cursor's built-in `create-skill` skill and run its draft / test / iterate loop.
- `tune description: <skill path>` (the skill exists but didn't trigger when it should have): hand to `create-skill` and run its description-optimization loop.
- `new skill via create-skill: <kebab-name>`: hand creation to `create-skill`. Do not invent the shape ad hoc.

If your environment ships a SKILL.md validator, run it on every touched skill before declaring done.

## 6. Summarize for the user

Short list, no preamble:

- Edits applied: `<skill path>`. What changed, one line each.
- New skills created: `<skill path>`. One line each (rare).
- Backlog filed to the devex tracker: `<issue title>` (`<tags>`). One line each.
- Dropped: one line per rejected finding + reason from the synthesizer.

From davafons/dotfiles, MIT.

More from davafons/dotfiles