Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool
This entry duplicates review-management, which is the one we list in search.

review-management

When the user wants to analyze, respond to, or improve their app reviews and ratings.

Skill by asker26

IndexedMIT★ 4
Write a review

Install

Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

npx agentmarket install skill/asker26-review-management

Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

When the user wants to analyze, respond to, or improve their app reviews and ratings. Also use when the user mentions "reviews", "ratings", "negative reviews", "how to get more reviews", "review response", or "my rating is dropping". For broader ASO audit, see aso-audit. For retention issues causing bad reviews, see retention-optimization.

Use cases: security

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

Permissions: not checked yet.

What's inside

Skill name
review-management
Description
When the user wants to analyze, respond to, or improve their app reviews and ratings. Also use when the user mentions "reviews", "ratings", "negative reviews", "how to get more reviews", "review response", or "my rating is dropping". For broader ASO audit, see aso-audit. For retention issues causing bad reviews, see retention-optimization.
License
MIT
Metadata
version: 1.0.0
Instructions
65 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub

Files (1)

  • SKILL.md

SKILL.md (first lines)

# Review Management

Expert in app review strategy and reputation management. Goal: turn reviews into growth lever.

# Assessment
1. Read `app-marketing-context.md`
2. App ID (to fetch reviews)
3. Target country (default: US)
4. Current rating + trend (improving/declining?)
5. Currently responding to reviews?

# Sentiment Categories
Bugs/Crashes -> fix + respond with timeline
Feature Requests -> track frequency, consider roadmap
UX Complaints -> prioritize UX improvements
Pricing Complaints -> review monetization
Love/Praise -> thank, ask for sharing
Competitor Mentions -> understand gaps

# Metrics Targets
Avg rating: 4.5+ (below 4.0 hurts conversion significantly)
Trend: stable or improving
Review velocity: consistent (sudden drops = prompt issues)
Response rate: 100% of negative
Response time: <24hrs

# Rating Prompt (SKStoreReviewController)
WHEN: after positive experience (task completed, goal achieved), 3+ sessions, 7+ days usage
NEVER: after crash/error/frustration, during onboarding/first session
Apple rules: max 3 calls per 365 days per device, Apple controls display, no customization
Triggers: achievement, streak (N consecutive days), value delivery (saved money/time), delight moment

# Negative Review Response (HEAR)
H=Hear (acknowledge specific issue), E=Empathize, A=Act (explain fix/timeline), R=Resolve (invite support contact)

Templates:
Bug: "Thank you for reporting. Fixed in [X.X] releasing [date]. Please update and let us know."
Feature request: "Great suggestion, added to roadmap. Stay tuned."
Vague negative: "Sorry about your experience. Please reach out to [support email] with details so we can help."

DON'T: be defensive, copy-paste same response, ignore negatives, ask to change rating (guideline violation), offer incentives

# Detractor->Advocate
Fix issue -> respond acknowledging fix -> follow up via support -> many users update review after resolution

# Competitor Review Mining
Find: unmet needs, common complaints (your opportunity), switching triggers, feature expectations (table stakes)

# Your Review Patterns
Analyze: most mentioned features (pos+neg), user segments, emotional language, competitor mentions

# Output
Review Health Report:
```
Rating: [X.X] stars ([trend up/down/stable]), Total: [N], Last 30d: [N] reviews [X.X] avg, Response rate: [X]%
Top Issues: 1.[issue]x[N] 2.[issue]x[N] 3.[issue]x[N]
Top Praise: 1.[praise]x[N] 2.[praise]x[N]
```
Action Plan: Immediate (respond to negatives), This week (fix top bug, optimize prompt), This month (top feature request, competitor review analysis)
Response drafts for most impactful negatives.

# Related
aso-audit, retention-optimization, competitor-analysis, app-analytics

From asker26/claude-task-framework, MIT.

Signals

Stars
4
Forks
0
Open issues
0
Last commit (this folder)
May 19, 2026 (5 months ago)

From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

Details

Version
1.0.0
License
MIT
First seen
Oct 24, 2026
Last checked
Oct 24, 2026

Same skill elsewhere

Copies of this SKILL.md published by others; search shows only one of them.

More from asker26

Cite this page

review-management skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/asker26-review-management (last updated 2026-10-24)