Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/andrew-tomago-win-evaluate
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: writing
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
- Runs as
- Shell scripts
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/win-evaluate
What's inside
- Skill name
win-evaluate- Description
- Score content variants with WIN committee experts. Use to generate committee_matrix.json, compare drafts, and tune rubric weights or expert focus.
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 32 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Before installing
- Ships executable scripts
Files (3)
- SKILL.md
- openai.yaml · agents/
- run_evaluate.sh · scripts/
SKILL.md (first lines)
# WIN Evaluate ## Overview Run only the committee scoring stage to produce `data/output/committee_matrix.json`. ## Workflow 1. Ensure `profiles.json` already exists (run profile stage first if needed). 2. Validate content and committee input contracts. 3. If required content/committee inputs are missing, please interview the user to acquire the necessary inputs before running commands. 4. Run committee evaluation and inspect weighted scores plus consensus spread. ## Command ```bash scripts/run_evaluate.sh ``` ## Input Contracts Expected schemas are documented in: - `../win-committee/references/data-contracts.md` ## Guardrails - Keep scoring criteria explicit through `rubric_weights`. - Avoid overfitting to one persona by checking expert weights and consensus spread. - If required inputs are missing, please interview the user to acquire the necessary inputs. - Keep user-specific drafts in `*.local.json` files.
From andrew-tomago/weighted-intelligence-nodes, MIT.
More from andrew-tomago/weighted-intelligence-nodes
- 0.411score
win-profile
andrew-tomago
Build WIN target profiles from public signals.
SkillDFreshness: DClaude Code +9 - 0.411score
win-summary
andrew-tomago
Summarize WIN committee_matrix.json into ranked markdown feedback.
SkillDFreshness: DClaude Code +9 - 0.214score
win-committee
andrew-tomago
No description from the publisher yet.
SkillDFreshness: DClaude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Feb 6, 2026 (8 months ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from andrew-tomago
Cite this page
win-evaluate skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/andrew-tomago-win-evaluate (last updated 2026-10-24)