Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool

abductive-leap

Generate the best current explanatory hypothesis from incomplete evidence.

Skill by Alubiama

IndexedMIT★ 1
Write a review

Install

Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

npx agentmarket install skill/alubiama-abductive-leap

Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

Generate the best current explanatory hypothesis from incomplete evidence. Use when the available signals are real but partial, and the next step requires a plausible unifying explanation rather than certainty.

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

Permissions

What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.

Tools
No tools found
Secrets
None asked for
Install scripts
None found

Network hosts it talks to 1

  • codeload.github.com · found in install command

Files it touches

  • ~/.claude/skills/abductive-leap

What's inside

Skill name
abductive-leap
Description
Generate the best current explanatory hypothesis from incomplete evidence. Use when the available signals are real but partial, and the next step requires a plausible unifying explanation rather than certainty.
License
MIT
Instructions
53 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub

Files (2)

  • SKILL.md
  • openai.yaml · agents/

SKILL.md (first lines)

# Abductive Leap

## Goal

Form the best current explanation from incomplete signals.

This skill does not claim proof. It proposes the most explanatory working hypothesis, keeps uncertainty visible, and defines what would strengthen or break the hypothesis.

## When To Use

- data is partial but not empty
- multiple weak signals point toward a common explanation
- the next move needs a working hypothesis

## Scope Boundaries

In scope:

- generate the strongest explanatory hypothesis
- compare alternative explanations
- define disconfirming evidence

Out of scope by default:

- presenting the hypothesis as established fact
- replacing full evidence review

## Workflow

1. State the observed signals.
2. Generate plausible explanations.
3. Compare which explanation covers the signals best with the fewest extra assumptions.
4. Select the best working hypothesis.
5. Define what would most likely falsify it.

## Output Contract

1. `observed_signals`
2. `candidate_explanations`
3. `best_working_hypothesis`
4. `why_it_best_explains`
5. `confidence_status`
6. `falsifiers`
7. `recommended_followup`
8. `next_step`

## Guardrails

- Do not confuse explanatory strength with proof.
- Keep at least one serious alternative alive when uncertainty is meaningful.
- Prefer the least assumption-heavy hypothesis that still explains the data.

From Alubiama/awesome-cognitive-skills, MIT.

More from Alubiama/awesome-cognitive-skills

Signals

Stars
1
Forks
0
Open issues
0
Last commit (this folder)
Mar 15, 2026 (7 months ago)

From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

Details

License
MIT
First seen
Oct 24, 2026
Last checked
Oct 24, 2026

More from Alubiama

Cite this page

abductive-leap skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/alubiama-abductive-leap (last updated 2026-10-24)