Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool

reviewer

Independently review one exact stable candidate for introduced actionable defects in a fresh session at the configured cadence boundary.

Skill by alphazede

IndexedApache-2.0★ 3
Write a review

Chalk Labs

Need help deploying reviewer?

Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.

Book a call

Install

Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

npx agentmarket install skill/alphazede-reviewer

Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

Independently review one exact stable candidate for introduced actionable defects in a fresh session at the configured cadence boundary. Use for Reviewer, code review, or defect adjudication. Do not use for implementation, automatic review, evidence scoring, user acceptance, author self-review, or unconfigured slice/round boundaries.

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

Permissions

What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md and code. Checked Oct 26, 2026.

Tools
No tools found
Secrets
None asked for
Install scripts
None found

Network hosts it talks to 1

  • codeload.github.com · found in install command

Files it touches

  • ~/.claude/skills/reviewer

What's inside

Skill name
reviewer
Description
Independently review one exact stable candidate for introduced actionable defects in a fresh session at the configured cadence boundary. Use for Reviewer, code review, or defect adjudication. Do not use for implementation, automatic review, evidence scoring, user acceptance, author self-review, or unconfigured slice/round boundaries.
License
Apache-2.0
Instructions
50 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub

Files (3)

  • SKILL.md
  • openai.yaml · agents/
  • repair-transition.md · references/

SKILL.md (first lines)

# Reviewer
Requested independent review: bind → start OCR → assess → validate → repair → verify.
## Inputs and match
Require approved baseline, exact candidate/diff, author identity, requested boundary,
objective, frozen capabilities, authority and return schema. Return `REROUTED` for
unrequested review, an unconfigured slice or round boundary, unstable candidate or another role.
The parent controller is the Orchestrator on a direct packet, Coordinator on a coordinator wave.
## Procedure
1. Reject author ancestry or candidate discontinuity. Bind approved wave base, exact
   head SHA, PR and effective merge-base; never substitute the last commit for a wave.
   Consume the gate-chain receipt; consume the most recent gate-chain receipt for the unit when no TE receipt exists.
   Do not re-litigate passed gates or duplicate Assurance Test Engineer work. Review scope is limited to introduced defects in requirement conformance, design, security reasoning and plan drift. When the packet carries a design lens, check the candidate against its rows per `../planning-and-design/references/oopdsa-design.md`.
2. Own selected/required OCR preflight and execution. Resolve configured availability
   once without credentials; preserve mode/model/effort. Preview the pinned diff and
   scope OCR to bugs and security in changed code, tests, configuration and affected
   call paths; keep relevant context. Follow [commands and coverage](../bearing-lite/references/review-capability.md).
3. Start OCR, then continue architecture, requirements, implementation conformance,
   verification/validation and applicable lint/quality work concurrently on the stable
   candidate. Reuse applicable candidate-bound evidence; add no assurance session.
   Review plan/specification documents and evidence yourself. Account for exclusions
   and unsupported surfaces; no automatic full scan or blanket evidence exclusion.
4. After OCR completes, validate and deduplicate its findings with yours; inspect
   required bug/security coverage gaps without repeating a full pass. Required missing
   coverage returns `NEEDS_MORE_EVIDENCE`; enabled-only absence permits a note.
   Compare a published standard against its cited text. Use Test Engineering only for
   a specific suspected test defect. Findings count toward `REPAIR_REQUIRED` or `BLOCK` only with `file:line` plus a failing test or reproducer; prove reachability and assign P0–P3.
   Otherwise findings are advisory and spend no repair budget. A verdict built only on advisory findings cannot be `REPAIR_REQUIRED` or `BLOCK`.
5. While Reviewer, never edit the candidate; freeze the receipt first: ref/revision/digest,
   finding IDs, proof, repair targets and write set. For validated in-scope findings,
   use the explicit Repair Implementer transition with preserved loaded context and
   same lineage under advance authority; no parent reproduction/acceptance round-trip.
   Consume `repair_transition` in `.bearing-round.lock`, `references/repair-transition.md`.
   Without advance authority, use the legacy parent-accepted `REPAIR_REQUIRED` route.
6. Aggregate all findings before the one repair. Run deterministic verification on the
   repaired candidate without another review. Never self-review or self-certify repair.
   Return both original review identity and repaired candidate, findings, coverage,
   exclusions, commands, usage, actual repairs and verification evidence to the parent.
## Return and recovery
Return verdict, candidate_ref, changed_paths, tests, findings, and blocker.
`REPAIR_REQUIRED` permits bounded correction; a repairable verdict permits one repair.
`ACCEPT`, `ACCEPT_WITH_FINDINGS`, and `BLOCK` are terminal.
`ACCEPT_WITH_FINDINGS` requires owner-approved residual risk; do not follow it with another repair. Preserve `max_assurance_rounds`
of 1 per declared phase or wave and at most one aggregated repair; no rereview or reset.
The next distinct declared phase or wave carries its own budget. Changed scope, protected
boundary, failed repair, findings outside the frozen receipt or exhausted allowance returns `OWNER_DECISION_REQUIRED`.
Late findings follow the repair reference; preserve proof, remaining allowance and closed-round finality.
A session that cannot continue returns `WAITING_ON`; dispatch needs existing authority.
The parent records deterministic closure; no publication authority or unrelated edits.

From alphazede/bearing-lite, Apache-2.0.

More from alphazede/bearing-lite

Signals

Stars
3
Forks
1
Open issues
9
Last commit (this folder)
Oct 18, 2026 (12 days ago)
Last release
Oct 21, 2026 (9 days ago)

From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

Details

License
Apache-2.0
First seen
Oct 24, 2026
Last checked
Oct 24, 2026

More from alphazede

Done for you

Rather not set it up yourself?

Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.

See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies

Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.

launches shipped
50+
launches shipped
media placements
500+
media placements
founders on every account
2
founders on every account

Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block

Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.

Get reviewer running in your business

Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.

Goes to the Chalk Labs founders, not the newsletter. Privacy

Need help deploying reviewer?

CallGet help
Cite this page

reviewer skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/alphazede-reviewer (last updated 2026-10-24)