who-is-this-for
Define a real ICP and the developer personas in the sale.
Skill by AIDevGTM
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/aidevgtm-who-is-this-for
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: marketing, finance
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/who-is-this-for
What's inside
- Skill name
who-is-this-for- Description
- Define a real ICP and the developer personas in the sale. Use when the user says the product is "for developers," can't name who would say no, or is marketing to whoever holds the budget instead of who actually adopts.
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 77 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Agent Skills spec issues
- name: "who-is-this-for" does not match folder "02-who-is-this-for"
Files (1)
- SKILL.md
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Who is this for?
> "Developers" is not a market. It's a medium. If your ICP doesn't exclude anyone, it isn't one.
**Use this when:** you describe your user as "developers" or "engineering teams," you can't name a person who is clearly *not* a fit, or you're aiming your messaging at the VP of Engineering because they have the budget.
## The core idea
A usable ICP is specific enough that some people are obviously **out**. "Every developer" gives you nothing to say, because a message that speaks to everyone speaks to no one. Sharpen until exclusion is possible.
And in almost every AI/dev-tool sale there is **more than one person**: the developer who adopts is rarely the person who pays. Market to the adopter; sell to the buyer. Confuse the two and you get great meetings and no decisions.
## Framework 1: The personas in the sale (Frankl)
Map who plays each role. You need all of them for a complex sale; skip one and the deal stalls.
| Persona | Cares about | Role in the sale |
|---|---|---|
| **Alpha Dev** | "What's possible?" Lives in the future. *No budget.* | Finds you, experiments, advocates internally, creates social proof |
| **Empowered CTO** | Kairos, weeks off a release cycle, competitive edge. *Has budget.* | Approves spend and strategic fit |
| **VP Engineering** | Team velocity, DX, quality at scale. Fears downtime/security | Evaluates feasibility, tests in staging |
| **SRE / Platform Eng** | Reliability, less toil. *Reads your code before your copy.* | Gatekeeps operational risk |
> The Alpha Dev is **not your long-term customer**. They chase the next shiny thing. You need them anyway: they carry new tech to the people who pay.
## Framework 2: Jobs to be done, not demographics (Czakon)
A job title is not actionable; a **job** is. Write it as:
> *When [situation], I want to [motivation], so I can [expected outcome].*
Example: *"When I inherit a service with no tests, I want to generate a safety net fast, so I can refactor without fear."* That sentence tells you the trigger, the pain, and the win. A demographic never does.
## Decision tree: single-player or complex sale?
```
Does the developer who adopts also control the budget?
├─ YES → single-player / PLG motion.
│ ICP centers on the adopter. Optimize time-to-value, self-serve, transparent pricing.
└─ NO → complex sale.
ICP centers on the adopter FOR ADOPTION, and the buyer FOR REVENUE.
You need a "what's in it for me" for every persona above.
```
## Sharpen it: the 5-attribute ICP
Fill every line with something a stranger couldn't guess:
1. **Company shape**: stage, size, team structure (e.g. "50-500-engineer companies with a platform team")
2. **Technical context**: stack / recent change (e.g. "just adopted Kubernetes")
3. **The trigger**: what just happened that makes this urgent now
4. **The pain, in their words**: the exact phrase they'd use (get this from `talk-to-users`)
5. **Who says no**: the segment you are deliberately *not* for
## Mistakes that look reasonable
- **TAM theater**: "there are 30M developers." True and useless. Nobody sells to 30M anyone.
- **Budget-chasing**: writing everything for the CTO/VP because they pay. They don't visit your homepage; the developer does.
- **Persona = job title**: "backend engineers." That's a hat, not a human. Use the job.
- **One persona, complex sale**: nailing the Alpha Dev and forgetting the buyer → adoption with no revenue.
## Example
❌ "For developers who want to ship faster."
✅ "For **platform engineers at 50-500-eng companies who just standardized on Kubernetes** and are drowning in hand-written YAML, the ones who'd say *'I spend a day a week on manifests I shouldn't have to touch.'* Not for solo devs on Heroku."
## Your next 30 minutes
- [ ] Write your ICP with all 5 attributes filled in, including **who says no**.
- [ ] List every persona in your sale and mark: who *finds* it, who *evaluates* it, who *pays*.
- [ ] Rewrite your one-line pitch as a **Job To Be Done** (`When… I want… so I can…`).
- [ ] If you couldn't fill attribute #4 in their real words → you owe yourself `talk-to-users` before anything else.
---
Built from real dev-tool GTM experience, with frameworks from Adam Frankl (*The Developer-Facing Startup*) and Jakub Czakon (*markepear.dev*).
Stuck on whether the ICP is right, or seeing two personas pull in different directions? That's worth a human call. Reach out to me on [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/in/devtoolgtm/).From AIDevGTM/gtm-cofounder, MIT.
More from AIDevGTM/gtm-cofounder
- 0.794score
founder-led-sales
AIDevGTM
Coach the user through actually selling: finding the champion and the buyer, running the first sales conversations, demoing their use case, handling "let me…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 325Claude Code +9 - 0.794score
growth-loops
AIDevGTM
Turn hand-made first-50 traction into self-reinforcing acquisition loops, so the next 5,000 users come from usage, not founder hours.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 325Claude Code +9 - 0.794score
start-here
AIDevGTM
Interview the user once and write a docs/gtm-cofounder/founder-brief.md that every other skill reads first, so the advice is about their real business, not a…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 325Claude Code +9 - 0.794score
strategy-and-roadmap
AIDevGTM
After the founder brief and the market research, turn them into an honest diagnosis and a prioritized, stage-aware GTM roadmap saved as…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 325Claude Code +9 - 0.794score
talk-to-users
AIDevGTM
Run developer customer discovery via a Technical Advisory Board (TAB).
SkillAFreshness: A★ 325Claude Code +9 - 0.794score
positioning-and-story
AIDevGTM
Build a positioning and narrative where the developer is the hero and a real trend is the villain.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 325Claude Code +9 - 0.794score
beyond-the-wrapper
AIDevGTM
Position an AI product when everyone claims AI and skeptics call it "just a wrapper." Find the real wedge (data, workflow, trust, domain), make reliability…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 325Claude Code +9 - 0.794score
value-prop-that-converts
AIDevGTM
Write a developer value proposition that is specific, provable, and free of puffery.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 325Claude Code +9 - 0.794score
the-homepage
AIDevGTM
Structure a dev-tool homepage that converts developers into champions.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 325Claude Code +9 - 0.794score
time-to-first-value
AIDevGTM
Turn a curious developer into an activated one: the docs, the quickstart, and the first-run experience that gets them to their first real win fast, and back…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 325Claude Code +9 - 0.794score
first-50-users
AIDevGTM
Get the first 50 real users through channels the user's ICP already uses.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 325Claude Code +9 - 0.794score
launch-it
AIDevGTM
Plan a developer launch (Show HN, Reddit, Product Hunt) that earns goodwill instead of a flaming.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 325Claude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 325
- Forks
- 31
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Sep 29, 2026 (29 days ago)
- Last release
- Oct 16, 2026 (12 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/AIDevGTM/gtm-cofounder
- Website
- gtmcofounder.com
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from AIDevGTM
- 0.794score
growth-loops
AIDevGTM
Turn hand-made first-50 traction into self-reinforcing acquisition loops, so the next 5,000 users come from usage, not founder hours.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 325Claude Code +9 - 0.794score
start-here
AIDevGTM
Interview the user once and write a docs/gtm-cofounder/founder-brief.md that every other skill reads first, so the advice is about their real business, not a…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 325Claude Code +9 - 0.794score
strategy-and-roadmap
AIDevGTM
After the founder brief and the market research, turn them into an honest diagnosis and a prioritized, stage-aware GTM roadmap saved as…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 325Claude Code +9 - 0.794score
talk-to-users
AIDevGTM
Run developer customer discovery via a Technical Advisory Board (TAB).
SkillAFreshness: A★ 325Claude Code +9 - 0.794score
positioning-and-story
AIDevGTM
Build a positioning and narrative where the developer is the hero and a real trend is the villain.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 325Claude Code +9 - 0.794score
founder-led-sales
AIDevGTM
Coach the user through actually selling: finding the champion and the buyer, running the first sales conversations, demoing their use case, handling "let me…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 325Claude Code +9
Cite this page
who-is-this-for skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/aidevgtm-who-is-this-for (last updated 2026-10-24)