Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool

security-deepsec

Run a generic DeepSec-backed security review and remediation burndown for one or more target repositories.

Skill by agent-ix

IndexedMIT
Write a review

Install

Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

npx agentmarket install skill/agent-ix-security-deepsec

Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

Run a generic DeepSec-backed security review and remediation burndown for one or more target repositories. Use when asked to audit a repo, app area, service family, frontend/backend/client/SDK surface, infrastructure, or security-sensitive workflow with DeepSec; when asked to create local audit artifacts, GitHub security issues, checksite coverage, finding reports, spec/AC/test traceability, or a repeatable security burndown process.

Use cases: frontend, backend, testing, devops

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

Permissions

What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.

Tools
No tools found
Secrets
None asked for
Install scripts
None found

Network hosts it talks to 1

  • codeload.github.com · found in install command

Files it touches

  • ~/.claude/skills/security-deepsec

What's inside

Skill name
security-deepsec
Description
Run a generic DeepSec-backed security review and remediation burndown for one or more target repositories. Use when asked to audit a repo, app area, service family, frontend/backend/client/SDK surface, infrastructure, or security-sensitive workflow with DeepSec; when asked to create local audit artifacts, GitHub security issues, checksite coverage, finding reports, spec/AC/test traceability, or a repeatable security burndown process.
License
MIT
Instructions
96 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub

Files (4)

  • SKILL.md
  • openai.yaml · agents/
  • artifact-templates.md · references/
  • checksite-catalog.md · references/

SKILL.md (first lines)

# Security DeepSec

If this plugin is not initialized or an Agent IX command fails, read [the dev-tools setup guide](https://github.com/agent-ix/dev-tools/blob/main/setup.md) for its prerequisites and local diagnosis.

Run a DeepSec-assisted audit as an evidence-first security review. Treat DeepSec as a candidate generator and investigation accelerator, not as the whole audit. The required output is a durable, traceable burndown: local artifacts for complete coverage plus GitHub issues for promoted findings.

## Core Rules

- Read local project instructions first: `AGENTS.md`, `CLAUDE.md`, README, specs, Makefiles, and repo-specific docs.
- Prefer repo-local DeepSec docs and tooling when `.deepsec/node_modules/deepsec` exists.
- If DeepSec is not installed in the target workspace, locate an approved local DeepSec clone or ask before installing/downloading dependencies.
- Keep audit artifacts local unless the user explicitly asks otherwise. Default to `<target-repo>/.deepsec/findings/<run-id>/`.
- Record every reviewed checksite, including negative review results. A complete audit includes "checked and no finding" evidence, not only promoted findings.
- Promote a finding only when file evidence, reachable behavior, impact, and remediation are clear enough to survive code review.
- For every finding, decide whether it needs a spec update, acceptance criteria update, and new tests tagged with the criterion ids they assert (the test matrix is computed by `quire matrix`; do not hand-edit it).
- Do not close GitHub issues until resolution comments include the tag, if any, and exact verification output.

## Workflow

1. **Define scope**
   - Identify target repos/packages from the user's request instead of assuming names.
   - Record included and excluded repos, missing requested repos, and why.
   - Detect tech stacks from package manifests, lockfiles, framework config, service manifests, route/client directories, infra manifests, and deployment entry points.

2. **Prepare DeepSec**
   - Use an existing `.deepsec` workspace when present.
   - If initialization is needed, ask before installing or downloading dependencies.
   - Keep `INFO.md` short and project-specific: entry-point conventions, auth/session helpers, authorization and tenant/org scope, SDK/client primitives, data stores, background jobs, and deployment boundaries.
   - Run from `.deepsec/` when using the CLI: `pnpm deepsec scan`, `pnpm deepsec process`, optional `pnpm deepsec revalidate`, then `pnpm deepsec export --format md-dir --out ./findings`.

3. **Inspect checksite coverage**
   - Export or inspect DeepSec data to enumerate candidate sites by file, matcher slug, severity, and status.
   - Compare candidates against real entry points and sensitive flows. Add manual checksites for anything DeepSec does not cover.
   - For custom or missing patterns, read DeepSec `docs/writing-matchers.md` and decide whether a custom matcher is warranted.
   - Use [references/checksite-catalog.md](references/checksite-catalog.md) for built-in DeepSec areas, manual review categories, and domain-specific examples.

4. **Manually investigate**
   - Read code around each candidate and adjacent trust boundaries.
   - Trace source to sink: user input, identity/session state, redirect URL, tenant/org ID, auth header, cookie, cache key, telemetry/log, route guard, server call, queue message, file path, SQL/query builder, or cloud resource.
   - Confirm server-side assumptions. UI-only restrictions are never sufficient evidence of enforcement.
   - Mark false positives and no-finding checksites explicitly with reason.

5. **Create local artifact package**
   - Use the structure in [references/artifact-templates.md](references/artifact-templates.md).
   - Include `INDEX.md`, `CHECKSITES.json`, `BURNDOWN.md`, `GITHUB.md`, `reports/*.md`, and per-project checksite notes.
   - Keep local paths stable and include enough evidence that another agent can resume the audit.

6. **Create GitHub issues for promoted findings**
   - Use the GitHub app or `gh` if available.
   - Label every finding issue `security`, `ai-handled`, and `deepsec`.
   - Add issues to the security review project when possible.
   - Include summary, impact, evidence with file/line refs, recommended remediation, verification checklist, spec/AC/test impact, and local report path.
   - Create or update an index issue that links all finding issues and summarizes scope/checksite coverage.

7. **Remediate only when requested or clearly in scope**
   - Implement fixes in the owning repo, using existing patterns.
   - Add focused tests for the failing security invariant and any spec/AC updates.
   - Run repo-native lint/test commands, using `make` where available.
   - Use Docker for permission cleanup when generated files are owned by root or containers.
   - Commit each repo separately with clear messages. Push, merge, tag, and close issues only when requested or explicitly approved.

## Finding Standard

A promoted finding must have:

- **Reachability:** how the vulnerable path can execute.
- **Trust boundary:** what input, identity, tenant, browser state, service principal, job payload, file, network peer, or external actor is untrusted.
- **Broken invariant:** the exact security property that fails.
- **Impact:** plausible unauthorized access, token/secret exposure, injection, XSS, CSRF, account enumeration, tenant escape, cache collision, data corruption, SSRF, RCE, or policy bypass.
- **Evidence:** file/line references and relevant code behavior.
- **Fix:** concrete remediation with criterion-tagged tests and spec/AC changes if needed.

If any part is uncertain, keep the item as a candidate or research note instead of filing it as a finding.

## Commands

Use these from a DeepSec workspace when applicable:

```bash
pnpm deepsec status
pnpm deepsec scan
pnpm deepsec process
pnpm deepsec revalidate
pnpm deepsec export --format md-dir --out ./findings
pnpm deepsec metrics
```

Use matcher-specific scans for calibration:

```bash
pnpm deepsec scan --matchers <slug1>,<slug2>
```

If the user asks for a complete audit, do not stop at DeepSec output. Reconcile DeepSec candidates, manual code review, specs, tests, and GitHub issue coverage.

From agent-ix/dev-tools, MIT.

More from agent-ix/dev-tools

Signals

Stars
0
Forks
0
Open issues
0
Last commit (this folder)
Oct 13, 2026 (16 days ago)
Last release
Oct 22, 2026 (6 days ago)

From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

Details

License
MIT
First seen
Oct 24, 2026
Last checked
Oct 24, 2026

More from agent-ix

Cite this page

security-deepsec skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/agent-ix-security-deepsec (last updated 2026-10-24)