create-skill

Files (1)

• SKILL.md

SKILL.md (first lines)

# List Affitor Skill

Turn a repeatable AI prompt or workflow into a structured, shareable skill for the
[affiliate-skills GitHub repository](https://github.com/Affitor/affiliate-skills).
The output is a complete SKILL.md file that works in any AI agent — shared via
`npx skills add Affitor/affiliate-skills` so anyone can install it.

## Stage

This skill belongs to Stage S8: Meta

## When to Use

- User has a prompt they keep reusing and wants to turn it into a shareable skill
- User wants to create a new skill for the affiliate-skills repository
- User wants to write a SKILL.md file in the standard format
- User says "make this a skill" or "write a skill for X"
- User wants to package an AI workflow so others can replicate it

## Input Schema

```
{
  raw_prompt: string       # (required) The prompt, workflow description, or detailed explanation of what the skill does
  failure_modes: string    # (optional) What goes wrong when the output is bad — helps write better Instructions and Error Handling
  niche: string            # (optional) Category hint, e.g., "content", "research", "seo"
  examples: string         # (optional) Example input/output pairs the user already has
}
```

## Workflow

### Step 1: Understand What the Prompt Actually Does

Before writing anything, analyze the user's raw prompt or workflow description:

1. **Task type** — Is this content creation, research, analysis, planning, automation, or something else?
2. **Variable inputs** — What changes each time? (product name, URL, audience, topic, etc.)
3. **Fixed structure** — What stays the same? (output format, sections, tone, constraints)
4. **Quality differentiator** — What makes a good output vs. a bad one?
5. **Failure modes** — Where does the AI tend to go wrong without explicit guidance?

If the user gave a vague description instead of an actual prompt, ask:
- "What do you typically paste into ChatGPT/Claude for this?"
- "What does the output look like when it works well?"
- "What goes wrong when it doesn't?"

If the user says "just do it", infer from context and proceed.

### Step 2: Determine Skill Metadata

Based on the analysis, determine:

| Field | How to decide |
|-------|--------------|
| `name` | Short, action-oriented. "Comparison Post Writer" not "A Skill for Writing Comparison Posts" |
| `slug` | kebab-case of name, e.g., `comparison-post-writer` |
| `category` | One of: research, content, seo, landing, distribution, analytics, automation, meta |
| `level` | beginner (1-step, no tools), intermediate (multi-step, 1 tool), advanced (complex workflow, multiple tools) |
| `stage` | S1-Research, S2-Content, S3-Blog, S4-Landing, S5-Distribution, S6-Analytics, S7-Automation, S8-Meta |
| `tags` | 3-6 lowercase tags relevant to the skill's domain |
| `tools` | What external tools the skill needs: `web_search`, `web_fetch`, `code_execution`, none |

### Step 3: Write the SKILL.md

Create a complete SKILL.md following this exact structure. Every section is required.

**Frontmatter (YAML)**
```yaml
---
name: [slug]
description: >
  [2-3 lines. First line: what it does. Second line: trigger phrases.
  This is used for skill discovery — be specific about use cases.]
license: MIT
version: "1.0.0"
tags: [relevant tags]
compatibility: "Claude Code, ChatGPT, Gemini CLI, Cursor, Windsurf, OpenClaw, any AI agent"
metadata:
  author: [user handle or "affitor"]
  version: "1.0"
  stage: [S1-S8]
---
```

**Title and Introduction**
One paragraph. What the skill does and what makes the output reliable. No marketing speak.

**When to Use**
3-5 specific trigger scenarios. "Writing a blog post" is too vague. "You need to publish a comparison post for two competing SaaS tools this week" is useful.

**Input Schema**
Typed definition of every variable input. Mark required vs optional.

**Workflow (numbered steps)**
This is the core. Each step must be concrete enough that any AI model produces consistent output:

- **Action** — what to do
- **Approach** — how to do it specifically
- **Quality bar** — what good looks like

Bad: "3. Write the pros and cons"
Good: "3. Write at least 3 pros and 2 cons. Each must reference a specific feature, not a vague category. 'Exports to 12 formats including PDF and DOCX' not 'Great export options'."

**Output Schema**
Typed fields that other skills can consume via conversation context. Include `output_schema_version: "1.0.0"`.

**Output Format**
A markdown code block showing the exact template with `[placeholder]` brackets. This is the single most important section for consistency.

**Error Handling**
3-5 named failure modes with specific recovery behavior. What happens when input is missing, ambiguous, or the task can't be completed?

**Examples**
2-3 concrete examples showing:
- User input
- Key decisions made during the workflow
- What the output looks like (excerpt, not full)

From Affitor/affiliate-skills, MIT.

More from Affitor/affiliate-skills