“code-review”

Use when reviewing HarmonyOS (ArkTS/ArkUI) code, when file extensions are .ets/.ts in HarmonyOS context, or when checking ArkUI component implementations…

Independent cross-tool review of finished implementation work — a diff against its brief and plan, reviewed by the other tool.

Use when README.md and docs/** need a full documentation audit — a sweep for broken links, stale counts, template conformance, agent-instruction consistency…

Iteratively and read-only review a plan file that follows the project plan template.

Conducts systematic, scoping, and narrative literature reviews using PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, and other appropriate sources.

Run any high-stakes question or decision through a council of 5 AI advisors (Contrarian, First Principles, Expansionist, Outsider, Executor) who independently…

Run a coverage-accountable, unusually strict review of Exograph for correctness, structural simplicity, deep modules, lifecycle safety, performance, tests…

Provides comprehensive code review guidance for React 19, Vue 3, Rust, TypeScript, Java, Python, and C/C++.

deterministic PR/code-quality scan (complexity, SOLID violations, hardcoded secrets, code smells) across 14 languages — a quick mechanical pre-check, not a…

Groq API(llama-3.3-70b-versatile)로 내용을 교차검증한다.

Generate a 512x512 QR code PNG for a given URL.

Run a safe Grok Build code review of a branch or explicitly requested local changes.

Build a purpose tree for a project that has none, or review an existing one as a whole — tree-wide gaps, implementations that no longer exist, stale nodes…

List and inspect installed OpenCode reviewer roles, select an appropriate exact role, and launch or collect an isolated code or security review with verified…

LM Studio のローカル LLM でブランチ差分をレビュー (user)

Use after a spec-backed implementation reaches closeout and before shipping when a post-implementation scope or YAGNI review is needed, or when the user…

Review requirements, plans, or specs with role-specific lenses.

Review a pull request from another author.

Canonical b00t reviewer capability — adversarial multi-framework code/datum review.

Review a pull request from the E2E-test-impact angle — what behaviors changed, what coverage exists, what the AI-QE pipeline would generate — and post the…

Use this skill when a user asks to review a pull request for bugs, wants AI code review focused on correctness issues, or runs /bug-review.

Multi-pass PR bug review — 5 parallel passes, majority voting, independent Opus validation, and resolution rate tracking.

Review a GitHub pull request chunk-by-chunk with inference-driven findings (security, correctness, performance, etc.), persisted per review and browsable as a…

Run an exact-HEAD GitHub PR review loop: trigger CodeRabbit if it is missing, wait without LLM polling, collect every review surface and unresolved thread…