“code-review”

Performs rigorous 5-axis code reviews across Correctness, Readability, Architecture, Security, and Performance.

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding…

Find bugs and potential issues in code changes.

Deprecated alias for the-reviewer.

Review a Tokyo Hiker pull request or branch diff for correctness, content conventions, and repository integration.

Use this skill when you need a risk-driven code review of a PR/diff with severity-ranked findings and actionable fixes; triggers include 代码审查, 代码评审, code…

Use this skill when you need a risk-driven code review of a PR/diff with severity-ranked findings and actionable fixes; triggers include code review, PR…

Review changes for real correctness, maintainability, regressions, missing tests, and integration defects with low-noise findings.

Review a focused change for correctness, safety, tests, and maintainability.

Exhaustively review every line in a diff from a fixed point along two independent axes—repository standards and the originating spec—with evidenced findings…

Comprehensive code review for commits and pull requests.

Review llama.cpp changes against project conventions and common reviewer pitfalls before a PR.

Review code using independent adversarial reviewers that search for concrete bugs, contract mismatches, and maintainability regressions.

Review the current diff, or a PR number/branch/path target, for correctness bugs (plus reuse/simplification/efficiency cleanups where the model's review…

用于所有代码审查操作。通过两路并行审查自动检查实现是否正确、完整、可合入——Eagle 1 检查代码质量与安全，Eagle 2 验证目标与上下文完备性。完成编码任务后或提交 PR 前使用。只要涉及代码审查或实现验证的请求，就请加载此技能。

AI-driven code review workflow that reviews uncommitted changes using a discoverable reviewer profile, presents findings for human decision, and iterates…

Use on Desktop when reviewing a diff, commit, branch, or local code for correctness, regressions, security, performance, and maintainability.

Three-axis review of the diff since a fixed point: Correctness (bugs, failure modes, security), Standards (repo conventions) and Spec (ticket/PRD fidelity).

审查自某个 fixed point（commit、branch、tag 或 merge-base）以来的变更，沿两个轴进行：Standards（代码是否遵循本仓库文档化的编码规范？）和 Spec（代码是否匹配原始 issue/spec 的要求？）。两个并行 sub-agent 分别运行审查并并排报告结果。当用户想要…

Structured engineering code review covering readability, complexity, test gaps, SOLID principles, and API consistency.

审阅一份改动：先看改动集是否越界，再找回归风险与无关改动，最后给最小复现。

Review software changes for high-confidence correctness, security, regression, test, and maintainability problems in the changed code.

Review branches, PRs, fixed commits, or working changes against repository standards and the originating spec.

Use when asked to review a diff, branch, or pull request, or before merging your own change.