“code-review”

代码审查框架：通用审查流程 + 语言特定规则引用，支持多语言代码审查

Review a diff, branch, PR, commit, or work-in-progress change along two separate axes: Standards (repo conventions, maintainability, safety) and Spec (does…

Use after a feature, before merge or PR, or when the user asks for a review.

Revisa as mudanças desde um ponto fixo (commit, branch, tag ou merge-base) em dois eixos — Standards (o código segue os padrões de codificação documentados…

Use when reviewing a Rails PR, diff, or merge request.

Code, security, and compliance review.

Guide for making code reviews.

Review Git changes for concrete defects and evidence-backed maintainability concerns.

Review code changes adversarially using parallel review layers (Blind Hunter, Edge Case Hunter, Acceptance Auditor) with structured triage into actionable…

Use when the user asks for a code review of a change, branch or PR.

Structured code review of files, diffs, or recent changes with severity-ranked findings.

审查自某个固定基点（commit、分支、tag 或 merge-base）以来的改动，沿两条轴进行——标准（代码是否遵循本仓库记录的编码规范？）和规格（代码是否符合源头工单/规格的要求？）。两项审查在并行子 agent 中运行，并把结果并排报告。当用户想审查一个分支、一个 PR、进行中的改动，或要求「审查自 X…

Diff/PR review: council → thermos deep + quality/yagni/slop-report → delta BPR → merge.

Review a diff or file for bugs, security issues, and simplifications.

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes: Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding…

Review changes since a commit, branch, or tag against the coding standards and the Spec.

Structured code review workflow for pull requests and individual files

Use when code review is needed.

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes: Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding…

沿三條軸審查自某個定點以來的 diff — Standards（有沒有遵守這個 repo 的規範？）、Spec（有沒有做到票要求的事？）與 Reuse（倉庫裡有沒有現成的？）。當使用者要審查一個分支、一個 PR 或進行中的工作時使用，也對應 "code review"、"review this…

Review a committed range or complete work-in-progress candidate against repository standards and its governing contract.

Review code for quality, security, performance, and maintainability.

Perform thorough code reviews with security, performance, and maintainability analysis.

Use when reviewing a diff, PR, or patch for bugs, regressions, missing tests, architecture risk, security risk, or reviewability concerns before merge.