“Code review”

Use when reviewing LMDeploy changes against backend contracts or maintainer conventions.

Use when reviewing a change, pull request, patch, refactor, migration, configuration update, dependency change, or release preparation.

Automate code review remediation loops with the codex CLI.

Structured code review for bugs, regressions, tests, and standards.

审查代码文件并输出结构化审查报告（问题列表 + 严重度 + 建议）

Default code-quality route for broad code review, PR review, maintainability, correctness, and regression-risk checks.

Code review automation for TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Swift, and Kotlin.

Review a diff since a fixed point along independent Standards and Spec axes.

Perform CWE-grounded security code reviews and precise weakness mapping using a locally derived MITRE CWE corpus, relationship graphs, mapping notes…

Perform a comprehensive DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) code review on a codebase.

Git diff 기반 코드 변경사항 자동 분석

Run an independent Claude Code review of local code changes, verify its findings, and fix confirmed issues.

Review a named diff or PR for bugs, regressions, tests, and standards.

Review code for best practices, potential bugs, and improvements.

Static code review skill for MQL5 Expert Advisors (and Indicators, Scripts, Services).

Use code-review-graph for local-first CLI/MCP code knowledge graphs, graph-backed code review, structural search, and repository-analysis integrations.

Convert actionable findings from a code-review output into separate, code-anchored comments and publish them together as one GitHub pull-request review.

Code review automation for TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Swift, Kotlin, C#, .NET, Java, C, C++, Rust, Ruby, PHP, and Dart/Flutter.

Structured code review using tiered persona agents, confidense-gated findings, and a merge/dedup pipeline.

Provides comprehensive code review guidance for React 19, Vue 3, Angular 17+, Svelte 5, Rust, TypeScript, Java, Java 8, PHP, Ruby, Rails, Python, Django…

Review PRs and patches for actionable correctness, API/UX, performance, security, and maintainability findings.

Use when reviewing your local git diff before opening a PR, requesting a git-range code review before merge, receiving and acting on review feedback with…

High-signal code review workflow for pull requests and patches: correctness, readability, API/UX, performance, security, and maintainability.

Review a change (a diff, a branch, or an implement pass's output) against the plan that authorized it and against engineering quality, then issue a verdict…