“code review”

Review code using independent adversarial reviewers that search for concrete bugs, contract mismatches, and maintainability regressions.

Independent quick or full code review of a branch, PR, commit range or uncommitted changes by a fresh read-only reviewer.

Performs rigorous 5-axis code reviews across Correctness, Readability, Architecture, Security, and Performance.

沿三條軸審查自某個定點以來的 diff — Standards（有沒有遵守這個 repo 的規範？）、Spec（有沒有做到票要求的事？）與 Reuse（倉庫裡有沒有現成的？）。當使用者要審查一個分支、一個 PR 或進行中的工作時使用，也對應 "code review"、"review this…

Security-focused code review of current git changes.

代码审查和质量分析技能。用于审查代码、发现潜在问题、提供改进建议。当用户请求代码审查、代码质量分析或最佳实践建议时使用。

Comprehensive code review for commits and pull requests.

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes: Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding…

Structured engineering code review covering readability, complexity, test gaps, SOLID principles, and API consistency.

Review a branch, PR, or worktree diff for repository conventions and stated intent.

Review diffs and change sets for bugs, regressions, risks, and missing tests.

Code, security, and compliance review.

Comprehensive pre-PR code review of the current branch with an issues-only tone and an approval gate before applying fixes.

How to review crate-x code

Reviews this session's code against the criteria in review-code.md.

Mandatory code reviews via /code-review before commits and deploys

Review code for bugs, security issues, and style violations.

Review code changes and report concrete risks first.

Review source files changed during a phase for bugs, security issues, and code quality problems

Systematic code review focusing on security, quality, and performance

Reviews code for correctness, security, performance, and project standards using independent review passes.

Expert code review against architecture and coding standards: readability, maintainability, security, performance, layering, Sonar-equivalent cleanliness…

Review code changes or repositories for correctness, security, performance, architecture, maintainability, dead code, unnecessary complexity, and technical…

Provides a structured workflow for planning and executing code reviews like a senior engineer.