LiveKit Agents vs LlamaIndex
LiveKit Agents and LlamaIndex are both agent frameworks for Python. LiveKit Agents is published by LiveKit and LlamaIndex by LlamaIndex. On GitHub, LlamaIndex has 52,641 stars and LiveKit Agents has 14,921. Both were last active in Oct 2026. The table lines up where they differ (publisher, license, weekly downloads and languages) and has the install commands for both. Everything here comes from the listings' public sources and is refreshed daily. LiveKit Agents describes itself as: Framework for Python or Node.js programs that join LiveKit rooms as realtime voice and video agents. LlamaIndex: Open-source Python toolkit for RAG and agents over your own data, with event-driven workflows and 300+ integration packages. Licenses: LiveKit Agents Apache-2.0, LlamaIndex MIT.
Updated Oct 26, 2026 · Built from catalog data; how we rank and grade
LiveKit Agents
LiveKit
Framework for Python or Node.js programs that join LiveKit rooms as realtime voice and video agents.
LlamaIndex
LlamaIndex
Open-source Python toolkit for RAG and agents over your own data, with event-driven workflows and 300+ integration packages.
Who should pick which
- Pick LiveKit Agents if you work in JavaScript.
- Pick LiveKit Agents if you want MCP support built in.
- Pick LiveKit Agents if you want a stable release (LlamaIndex is marked beta).
- LlamaIndex has the larger community: 52,641 GitHub stars against 14,921.
From listing data only. We don't pick a winner on security beyond the grades; read how grades work.
Side by side
| Fact | LiveKit Agents | LlamaIndex |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Harness | Harness |
| Publisher | LiveKit | LlamaIndex |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Pricing | Not stated | Not stated |
| Runs | Not stated | Not stated |
| Auth | Not stated | Not stated |
| Hosts supported | Not stated | Not stated |
| Tools | Not listed yet | Not listed yet |
| Security grade | –Security: not graded yet | –Security: not graded yet |
| Freshness grade | AFreshness: A | AFreshness: A |
| GitHub stars | 14,921 | 52,641 |
| Weekly downloads | 963,876 | 1,391,530 |
| Last release | Oct 24, 2026 | Sep 21, 2026 |
| Last activity | Oct 24, 2026 | Oct 14, 2026 |
Facts from each listing's public sources, checked daily. Tool lists arrive with tool scans.
Install
LiveKit Agents
pip install livekit-agents
LlamaIndex
pip install llama-index
Also consider
- 0.753score
LangChain
LangChain
Python framework of interoperable components and integrations for building agents and LLM apps, with LangGraph and Deep Agents layered above it.
HarnessAFreshness: A★ 148.4K↓ 37.3M/wk - 0.748score
LangGraph
LangChain
Low-level Python orchestration framework for long-running stateful agents, with durable execution, human review points and short- and long-term memory.
HarnessAFreshness: A★ 43.8K↓ 13.1M/wk - 0.732score
CrewAI
CrewAI
Open-source Python framework for multi-agent workflows, with role-based Crews and event-driven Flows.
HarnessAFreshness: A★ 60.1K↓ 644.6K/wk
Questions
- Is LiveKit Agents or LlamaIndex more popular?
- LlamaIndex has more GitHub stars (52,641 against 14,921). Stars measure attention, not quality, so check freshness and docs too.
- Are LiveKit Agents and LlamaIndex open source?
- Yes: LiveKit Agents is Apache-2.0 and LlamaIndex is MIT.
Related
- AlternativesAlternatives to LiveKit Agents
- AlternativesAlternatives to LlamaIndex
- Best ofBest agent frameworks for Python
- ComparisonLangChain vs LiveKit Agents
- ComparisonCrewAI vs LiveKit Agents
- ComparisonLlamaIndex vs Strands Agents
- ComparisonGitHub Copilot SDK vs LlamaIndex
- ComparisonDeep Agents vs LlamaIndex
Cite this page
LiveKit Agents vs LlamaIndex. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/compare/livekit-agents-vs-llamaindex (last updated 2026-10-26)