Firecrawl MCP Server vs CRW Web Scraper
Firecrawl MCP Server and CRW Web Scraper are both MCP servers for web scraping. Firecrawl MCP Server is published by firecrawl (the vendor) and CRW Web Scraper by us. Firecrawl MCP Server runs locally (stdio) and as a remote server (HTTP), while CRW Web Scraper runs locally (stdio). Firecrawl MCP Server lists installs for Claude Code, VS Code, Codex and Cursor; CRW Web Scraper for Claude Code, Codex, VS Code and Cursor. On GitHub, Firecrawl MCP Server has 7,676 stars and CRW Web Scraper has 1,173. Both were last active in Oct 2026. For auth, Firecrawl MCP Server uses bearer token, API key and CRW Web Scraper uses no auth. The table lines up where they differ (publisher, official vendor, license and runs) and has the install commands for both. Everything here comes from the listings' public sources and is refreshed daily.
Updated Oct 26, 2026 · Built from catalog data; how we rank and grade
Firecrawl MCP Server
firecrawl
Firecrawl, the context API for AI agents: search, scrape, interact with the web, plus paper search.
CRW Web Scraper
us
Open-source web scraper for AI agents with scrape, crawl, and map tools
Who should pick which
- Pick Firecrawl MCP Server if you want a remote server with nothing to install locally.
- Pick Firecrawl MCP Server if you prefer the vendor's own MCP server.
- Firecrawl MCP Server has the larger community: 7,676 GitHub stars against 1,173.
From listing data only. We don't pick a winner on security beyond the grades; read how grades work.
Side by side
| Fact | Firecrawl MCP Server | CRW Web Scraper |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Connector | Connector |
| Publisher | firecrawlOfficial | us |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Pricing | Not stated | Not stated |
| Runs | Local (stdio), Remote (HTTP) | Local (stdio) |
| Auth | Bearer token, API key | No auth |
| Hosts supported | Claude Code, VS Code, Codex, Cursor, Windsurf, Claude Desktop | Claude Code, Codex, VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Claude Desktop |
| Tools | 3 | Not listed yet |
| Security grade | –Security: not graded yet | –Security: not graded yet |
| Freshness grade | AFreshness: A | AFreshness: A |
| GitHub stars | 7,676 | 1,173 |
| Weekly downloads | Not measured | Not measured |
| Last release | Oct 22, 2026 | Oct 21, 2026 |
| Last activity | Oct 23, 2026 | Oct 21, 2026 |
Facts from each listing's public sources, checked daily. Tool lists arrive with tool scans.
Install
Firecrawl MCP Server
claude mcp add --transport http firecrawl-mcp-server https://mcp.firecrawl.dev/v2/mcp
Settings it needs
Authorizationsecret · Optional. Bearer <FIRECRAWL_API_KEY>. Get a key at https://firecrawl.dev/app/api-keys
CRW Web Scraper
claude mcp add crw -- docker run -i --rm ghcr.io/us/crw:latest crw-mcp
Also consider
- 0.817score
CRW Web Scraper
fastcrw
Open-source web scraper for AI agents with scrape, crawl, and map tools
ConnectorAFreshness: ALocal★ 1.2KClaude Code +5 - 0.659score
Scrapegraph MCP
ScrapeGraphAI
AI-powered web scraping and data extraction capabilities through ScrapeGraph API
ConnectorCFreshness: CLocal★ 117↓ 141/wkClaude Code +5 - 0.676score
proxy-scraper
maximilianfeix
Free proxies that actually work: checked HTTP/SOCKS proxies, and pages fetched through them
ConnectorAFreshness: ALocalRead-only★ 67↓ 444/wkClaude Code +5
Questions
- Is Firecrawl MCP Server or CRW Web Scraper more popular?
- Firecrawl MCP Server has more GitHub stars (7,676 against 1,173). Stars measure attention, not quality, so check freshness and docs too.
- Do Firecrawl MCP Server and CRW Web Scraper work with Claude Code?
- Yes, both list a Claude Code install; the commands are on this page.
- Which one runs without a local install?
- Firecrawl MCP Server offers a remote endpoint; CRW Web Scraper runs locally.
Related
Cite this page
Firecrawl MCP Server vs CRW Web Scraper. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/compare/firecrawl-firecrawl-mcp-server-vs-us-crw (last updated 2026-10-26)